• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is it possible to identify who is to blame for the debt crisis?

Extracts from this document...


Is it possible to identify who is to blame for the debt crisis? The debt crisis, a term used for discussing the situation of third world debt, is an extremely complex issue, with multiple factors affecting the constantly fluctuating and increasing problem that many of the least developed countries (LDCs) are still facing today. One of the key aspects of the debt crisis is not necessarily the loans themselves - all countries have some deficit, but rather the sustainability of the debt; that is whether or not a country can afford to repay the loans it has taken out (if a debt is over 40% of a countries GDP it qualifies as unsustainable). Questions that comes to mind when looking at the debt crisis today, and indeed the crisis that has been developing since the 1960s, is how can creditors be happy to lend money to developing countries whose situation indicates a high improbability of being able to repay the loans without immense damage to their economy for which the loans are meant to be beneficial? Are these decisions calculated? And why are the loans harming not helping? It is the nature of a capitalist, consumerist economy for loans to be encouraged whether on a huge scale such as those faced by LDCs in the debt crisis, or small scale loans such as credit cards and mortgages. ...read more.


ever paid back in full" (Eichengreen & Lindert 1992:3). The events in the 1970s set the precedent for the next 20+ years, in which problems were faced largely by a variety of cause and effect situations, meaning blame could be circulated over and over, there is no clear cause. However some countries such as Indonesia and South Korea successfully managed to gain some economic prosperity through loans, raising the question of whether they made wise investments opposed to the so called bad economic policies of some indebted countries, or whether their investments were lucky and caught the economy at the right time, highlighting again the difficulty of assigning blame. Whilst OECD states recovered from the recession reasonably easily, the heavily indebted countries fell further and further behind. In the case of Latin America the financial situation reached such a severe problem that Mexico defaulted on their loan, having a massive knock on effect on the willingness of creditors to lend. Leaving struggling countries with no money to invest, no substantial demand for the export products they relied on so heavily and a disadvantage in the trade market, due to OECD states adopting protectionist policies, driving a wedge between market and shadow prices (Sachs 1989:13) and resulting in LDCs having little or no money for investment and development of welfare as it was being used for consumerism. ...read more.


highlights the impact irresponsible lending has had in what is described as "violation of prudential standards of creditworthiness" i.e. lending money to a source that can quite clearly not pay the money back, at least not without serious sacrifice. For whatever motives, the banks have made serious errors resulting in uncontrollable amounts of debt. However, many miscalculations have been made on the side of the debtors too, including both accepting unrealistic loans and harbouring overambitious goals (though can they be blamed for this?). One of the key issues surrounding this debate is that the loans were not forced by either party, encouraged unwisely perhaps, or accepted too eagerly, but not forced. Therefore blame cannot be assigned, perhaps even, it is just the uncontrollable nature of our economy that is behind the crisis reaching the level it is at today. In cases where "odious debt" exists however it is much easier to pin point the driving force behind unsustainable debt - unconceivable selfishness, corruption and complete disregard for the country they are supposed to be in charge of. Unfortunately whatever is to account for the situation today, it is clear who it is suffering the most from it, and sadly, those who are hit the hardest by the debt crisis are also the ones with the smallest influence on how it will shape out. Sadly it seems that economic capital is more valuable than human life and development. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Political & International Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Political & International Economics essays

  1. Breaking up Banks and Financial institutions that are Too Big To Fail since they ...

    In large economies such as the US economy policymakers stay out of directing banks and the third reason is not dominant for the existence of the institutions of a large scale.

  2. Business Environments - Oil Price Development and the Consequences for the Economy.

    As a response, the OPEC pushed beyond a fourth-Cut and sought support from other countries (Bleich et al, 2012). At the end of 2001 a corresponding alliance with Russia, Norway and Mexico was found. At this time the crude oil price had already dropped below 17-dollars per barrel.

  1. International role of the Euro and the developing Euro crisis.

    Finally, a factor which may be particularly important for small, open economies is that adopting the euro may provide stronger protection against international financial disturbances. Such disturbances have often had a disproportional effect on smaller economies, raising the risks of external shocks.

  2. To what extent was the financial crisis a consequence of government failure to regulate ...

    Had she not intervened and made these amendments it's possible that the economy would have gone into a depression. The government today could take some her right wing policies and implement them in order to help ease us out of the recession.

  1. HSBC and the Argentine Peso Crisis

    investor confidence by ruling out the risk of inflation, it resulted in making Argentina vulnerable to external shocks and was one of the primary causes of the economic meltdown of 2001. Specifically the devaluation of the Brazilian real in 1999 and the international revaluation of the USD in the late

  2. Causes and Effects of the Global Financial Crisis

    debt, about seven times the amount of their $620 billion in equity. Bailing out Europe is beyond the practical capacity of Germany, whose G.D.P. is approximately ?2.6 trillion. Just as importantly, Germany faces severe political constraints on rescuing Europe. Chancellor Angela Merkel faces deep divisions within her own party, fueled by the constant negative drumbeat of the Bundesbank.

  1. The Theory of Human Capital: Egypt and the USA examined.

    Nevertheless, he explained that he liked Communications and wanted to work in the field but was never able to. He added that to work in communications he had to use nepotism and he had to have many connections, a path he wasn?t willing to take.

  2. The establishment of the World Trade Organisation has led to a significant reduction in ...

    surplus, and has brought some revenues to the government. The net change in welfare is indeed the sum of all these losses and gains. To use the geometric areas of the graph that pertains to changes in consumer surplus: 1.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work