Is Organizational Behavior Modification a form of manipulation?

Authors Avatar by rose_royal03 (student)

Reaction Paper: Is Organizational Behavior Modification a form of manipulation? And if it is, is it unethical for managers to manipulate the behavior of employees?

        Let me define first the controversial topic in this paper, Organizational Behavior Modification and Manipulation. Organizational Behavior Modification (as textbook says) refers to the management practice of trying to eliminate negative behaviors among its employees in the belief that such negative behaviors affect their work performance. This is being done by many organizations today for the purpose of improving productivity by reducing “errors”, absenteeism, tardiness, and accident rates (Robbins, 2005 ) Whereas, manipulation is defined as a thought process, not a behavior process. Behavior is only the product. Manipulation (psychological manipulation) in this manner according to wikipedia is a type of  that aims to change the perception or behavior of others through underhanded, deceptive, or even  tactics. By advancing the interests of the manipulator, often at the other's expense, such methods could be considered , devious, and . In this context, there is nothing devious in making employees do something which could redound to their own benefit like preventing accidents in the workplace or coming to work on time. OB Modification, therefore, is not a form of manipulation; hence, it is not unethical practice, because managers are openly sincere in their aim of preventing negative behavior and encouraging employees in a positive way. Applying the five ethical decision criteria in this context, OB modification results in the common good of employees (utilitarian approach), it respects the rights of everyone involved (rights based approach) because employees are not forced to do something out of their will, it treats people fairly because everyone is given a chance to participate (fairness or justice approach), it contributes most to the quality of life of the people involved and try to eliminate bad behavior (common good approach) and it encourage good behavior (virtue approach). So for me, OB modification is ethical since it redounds to the common benefit of everyone, the employees and the organization.

Join now!

        Nowadays, most companies are resorting to continuing training programs and a perpetual orientation program to emphasize desirable organizational behaviors and eliminate what constitute negative and therefore unproductive organizational behaviors. Performance appraisal which is followed by positive reinforcement system contributes towards this objective because good performers are rewarded. For one, Burrhus Frederic Skinner has advocated the maximum use of positive reinforcement. He opposes negative reinforcement because of it’s conceive implication. Just like Skinner, I am not an advocate of negative reinforcement. Manipulative behavior can seriously damage the productivity and effectiveness of everyone in the organization. I guess many people who use ...

This is a preview of the whole essay