Mary Kay Cosmetics: Asian Market Entry

Authors Avatar

Mary Kay Cosmetics:Asian Market Entry

Team ATTAKK

Kunal Ahuja

Alessandra C. Elder

Tarun Mishra

Chun-Hsiang Peng

Kartik Vaswani

November 17, 2009

Contents


Executive Summary

Mary Kay Cosmetics Inc.'s products had been sold outside the United States for over 15 years, but by 1992, international sales represented only 11% of the $1 billion total. Our goal is to increase compounded annual revenue growth rate in company sales to 10% over a period of five years from 1993 to 1998 in China. The biggest impediment is our direct selling distribution method. Direct selling companies account for only 3% of all consumer product retail sales in China.  Skincare products account for even a smaller share of this 3%. The solution is to modify the direct selling method by developing the “Mary Kay Institute of Advanced Skin Care.”  This institute will serve as an educational training facility, have glamorized storage units to house a beauty consultant’s products for sale, and serve as an entertainment facility for beauty consultants to facilitate product selling parties.  


Goal

Our goal is to increase compounded annual revenue growth rate in company sales to 10% over a period of five years from 1993 to 1998 in China.

Why Chinese market? We are too late to enter in a mature, complex, fragmented, and highly competitive Japanese market without significant costs to become competitive by building brand awareness and product differentiation. Moreover, the cost of goods, product development, promotion, advertising, management, and start-up investment are much higher than in China. In addition, the competition from foreign competitors is low and the cosmetic market entry has less government barriers as compare to Japan. Chinese population is almost ten times more than the Japan and growth rate is also high.

Where is quantifiable measure derived from? Since we have already achieved a compounded annual growth rate of 16% in international company sales in a similar time frame of 6 years from 1986 to 1992, a growth rate of 10% in China in the similar time frame of 5 years is attainable. (Exhibit 1 depicts the growth in MKC net revenues between 1986 to 1992.) The international growth rate averages 2.6% every year.  In five years, we would normally expect a 13% growth rate.  However, to account for our new market entry and introduction product life cycle phase, we are expecting a modest initial growth of 10% for the first 5 years. (Exhibit 1 also depicts the future growth in MKC net revenues between 1993 to 1998.)

The compounded annual growth rate of 10% would come from two sources- simultaneous entries into Shanghai and Guangzhou. The new market customers from Shanghai (commercial and cultural capital of China) will help us permeate the remainder of the Chinese provinces due to its cultural influence on the rest of China (Exhibit 2). We expect 5.5% of the total of 10% to come from customers in Shanghai. The consumers in Shanghai are more conscience about their appearance, and it is the largest cosmopolitan city in China, this rate of growth is achievable. We will also target another 4.5% of our total of 10% to come from customers in Guangzhou because the people of Guangzhou have high disposable income and are willing to spend a large portion of their disposable income on living a luxurious lifestyle (Exhibit 3.) Guangzhou is also ideal because of the ease of new business approvals.  We chose not to enter Beijing because compared to Shanghai and Guangzhou, the consumer is less concerned with appearances and therefore spend less on cosmetics.  Also, to become an established brand, we would experience more difficulties from governmental legislation and policies.  A comparative analysis can be seen in (Exhibit 4.)

Why this time frame? We chose the time frame of 5 years because we have to take two years to complete a joint venture agreement with a Chinese partner.  While this is occurring, it will also take us two years to build a manufacturing facility in China. We need one year for research and to study the market and tastes of consumers, one year for training the consultants and sales people and setting up of operation and communication facilities. The first two years will be used to leverage our set up and break even (Exhibit 5.)  Most of these activities will be occurring simultaneously.  We anticipate the growth phase to begin in the next three years, from 1995-1998.  Also, a cost analysis is in Exhibit 6.

Goal Defense

Alternative goals

  1. Market share: Market share was not a viable option because brand awareness is non-existent in the Chinese market. Therefore, we decided to first focus on the rate of our revenue growth.  Also, because we are in the introduction phase of the product life cycle and sales will be low, market share is not the best measure to determine success.  Once we have entered the growth phase, we can contemplate quantifying our market share.  We are not a market leader, challenger, follower, or nicher because our market share has not been established.  
  2. International sales- Another alternative we considered was to increase the percent of our international sales from 11% of total sales to 25% in 5 years from 1992 to 1997. We ruled this out because in our opinion the Chinese market would make up the largest portion of international sales. Therefore, if we first targeted the Chinese market, our international sales would correspondingly increase.
Join now!

Asian Market Entry: China vs. Japan

We have chosen not to enter Japan because the Japanese market is already mature, complex, fragmented, and highly competitive. Moreover, the cost of goods, product development, promotion, advertising, management, and start-up investment are much higher than in China. We have chosen to enter the Chinese market because the competition from foreign competitors is low as compared to Japan. Also, the Chinese population is almost ten times more than the Japan; growth rate is high, and therefore, overall consumption in China is higher. Consumption in China has an annual growth rate of 6.6%.  In spite ...

This is a preview of the whole essay