• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Performance Appraisal case study

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Executive Summary The Sales Manager at AX Systems, a small Spanish company which manufactures computer equipment, had announced his intention to leave the firm. To succeed him, there were two internal candidates being considered. The first, Juan Diez Martin, was a 20 year veteran who believed that the job was his given his seniority with the company and the fact that he was named Salesperson for the Year for the past 5 years. The second, Jose Luis Rodriguez Gonzalez, was with the company a respectful 5 years and had received much customer praise and recognition in that time. A decision to promote Jose Luis was made at the hands of the HR Manager who based his decision on the position job description and the employees' performance appraisals which were evaluated on a trait scale by their department manager. The appraisals were vague and were not communicated to the employees. There was no "action plan" put into place to ensure employees' performance could be improved. The decision to promote Jose Luis was told to the employees jointly in the HR Manager's office. After this time Juan claimed that the decision was unfair and came as a result of the Sales Manager being friends with Jose Luis. At that time the HR Manager provided both Juan and Jose Luis' appraisals for Juan to review. The failures here were that the individual selected for the position was selected in an unfair way. He may not be the best person for the job. Also, the way in which the entire process was handled was inappropriate. The HR Manager should not have informed the employees together nor should she have provided any of Jose Luis' confidential information to Juan. To respond to the immediate problem, the job offer should be rescinded while the management team has an opportunity to review which candidate is the best fit for the position. ...read more.

Middle

Cost of Option 4 Item Explanation Total Cost Legal 4 hours @150 Euro/hr 400 Euro Interview Preparation 1 hour @ 48 Euro/hr 48 Euro TOTAL 928 Euro Complimentary Alternatives Regardless of which option is taken with respect to the promotion decision, there are several organizational alternatives that need to be considered: 1. Discipline or Terminate HR Manager As laid out in the Problem Statement, the HR Manager's failures are what ultimately led to this situation. He should be disciplined and retrained. Given how pivotal knowledge of hiring and performance management is for an HR professional, the company should evaluate whether or not the incumbent is the right person for the job. Terminating employment may need to be considered. The Director should assess the other responsibilities of the HR Manager. 2. Create a Clear Hiring and Promotion Policy Although companies are able to hire and promote employees as they see fit, it is in the best interest of everyone if clear guidelines are followed in order to find the right person for the job. In this case, simply clarifying the core competencies (at least 6 of them) then matching these to the candidates' abilities would have aided the situation. 3.. Implement a Standard Performance Review System The system could be paper-based or an easy-to-use software system. It should be behavioral based and include dimensions as well as examples of the dimension. It should list goals that are: Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Reliable, and Timely. The company should consider which of the following they would like to include: peer reviews, subordinate reviews, 360s, Customer Appraisals and Self-Reviews. Using at least some of these methods would garner more reliability with the result. The review also needs to be communicated to the employee along with an action plan of how the supervisor can help the employee succeed in his/her job. 4. Train all Supervisory and Management Staff in Performance Management This point should be conducted in conjunction with point 3. ...read more.

Conclusion

Consequently, the company will be in a better position to meet their strategic goals. From a legal standpoint, this system protects both the company and the employee. Employees will know what the expectation (and failure) is. In any instance where the company is confronted with legal action for situations such as unlawful dismissal, it should be easy to foster proof of: job description, written instructions, employee review of appraisal results, an action plan to improve behavior, agreement among multiple raters, and there was rater training. Cost of Solution Item Explanation Total Cost Legal 4 hours @150 Euro/hr 400 Euro Interview Preparation 1 hour @ 48 Euro/hr 48 Euro Sourcing and Purchase of 10 hours @ 19 Euro (HR 3,192 Euro Appraisal Software Administrator) + Software @ 3000 Euro Training on Software 8 managers for 8 hrs @ 48 Euro 3,077 Euro Training Development Costs for 10 hours @ 48 Euro/hr 480 Euro Performance Management Total Training Costs (In-house 8 managers @ 8 hours @ 48 4162 Euros with set-up) Euro Administrative cost/Participant Materials = 1000 Euro Food = 90 Euro TOTAL 11,359 Euro APPENDIX: The Performance Management Training should contain the following: 1. Objectives: a. How to motivate employees to improve their performance b. Benefits to providing regular feedback c. Inventory of skills and capabilities d. Support the termination and layoff process 2. Guiding Principles 3. Communication Principles & Active Listening 4. Principles of Feedback: a. Describe the behavior in non-threatening terms b. Express consequences of this behavior c. Help employee make a plan to discontinue behavior d. Use positive feedback to show recognition of effective behavior e. Always use motivating, not deflating terms. 5. Positive Reinforcement of Behavior 6. Performance Diagnosis - My employee is not doing what I want him/her to do; what should I do? 7. How to handle a performance coaching meeting. Learn the art of script writing. 8. Corrective Action - When and how do we discipline an employee for poor performance? 9. How to write a corrective action letter. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Human Resource Management section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Human Resource Management essays

  1. A PROJECT REPORT ON PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PRACTICES IN ONGC ...

    There should be potential once in a year and information should b given to employee about their future prospects Scaling Strongly agree Agree Natural Disagree Strongly disagree Percentage 20 37 15 20 8 Interpretation A sizable majority is for having PA in ONGC once in three years to inform the employee about their likely future growth.

  2. Management and leadership within health visiting team in Edmonton locality.

    How should we plan the "exploration" as well as check our progress to ensure we arrive at our desired proposal goal, through our CAPABLE STAFF? Open relationships What is a Team? A team is a group of individuals who work together to produce products or deliver services for which they are mutually accountable.

  1. A CASE STUDY OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IN A SMALL PUBLIC SECTOR ORGANISATION

    That new system should be developed through engagement with staff. Declaration This work is original and has not been submitted previously for any academic purpose. All secondary sources are acknowledged. Signed................................................................................................ Date................................................................................................... Table of contents page Acknowledgements.................................................................................2 Abstract................................................................................................3 Declaration...........................................................................................4 Table of contents....................................................................................5 List of tables.........................................................................................7 List of figures........................................................................................8 1.

  2. The purpose of this exercise is to introduce the relationship of selecting, evaluating, building ...

    The importance of accepting responsibility for our own problems, rather than blaming others is clear distinction of being a leader. B. Communicating Company Vision and Mission Until the early 1990s, it was not uncommon for organizations to think and plan in terms of a five-, seven-, or even ten-year strategy.

  1. Reward Management, Monitoring Performance and Exit Rights & Procedures

    However, the term 'market pricing, in its extreme form is used to denote a process of directly pricing jobs on the basis of external relativities with no regard to internal relativities. This approach was widely publicized in the US in the mid-1990's as a reaction to what was regarded as

  2. Do Adult Learning Theories offer adequate explanatory or predictive foundations for HRD? Offer an ...

    was for the instructor and student to enter into a form of conversation rather than a led discussion. The model needed to flatten the hierarchy but not in the sense that authoritative pattern (as opposed to authoritarian) of the faculty would be removed from the instructional process (Griffith, 1999 p.346).

  1. Performance Appraisal: Remedial Action. he first purpose of this review is to analyze ...

    Bartol et all (2010, p.405-406) defined performance management as "a collective range of activities conducted by an organization aimed at enhancing individual, group or unit-level performance, with the overarching purpose of improving organizational performance in the long term." The scope of performance management process is broader than of the performance appraisal process.

  2. Human Resource Management - HRM approaches, HR Planning, Job Evaluation, Reward Management system and ...

    In openly communicating these standards and policies to its employees, the HR division could document those mandatory policies, standards, working conditions, rules & regulations in to a document for the employees? awareness. 2.5 Recruitment Approaches Recruitment is the process of searching the candidates for employment and stimulating them to apply for jobs in the organization.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work