Responding to Kohn 'Why incentive plans can work'.

Authors Avatar

Jahurul Choudhury

Advanced Managerial Accounting

Dr Eva Labro 

Responding to Kohn ‘Why incentive plans can work’

“Even if people were principally concerned with their salaries … there is no firm basis for the assumption that paying people more will encourage them to do better work or even in the long run, more work”.  

This is the underlying theme of Alfie Kohn’s arguments in ‘why incentive plans cannot work’ where Kohn argues of the failure of the behaviorist model of motivation which underlies agency theory and particularly the contracting relationships between the principal (shareholders in the case of public quoted companies) and the agent (the board of directors). This challenge to the legitimacy of the commonly held belief in the power of incentives to motivate individuals to a course of action that is mutually beneficial to the contracting parties is an indirect attack on the agency model and the nature of the contracting relationship.

Kohn delves into the nature of work motivation and the notions of intrinsic motivation versus extrinsic motivation and he argues that extrinsic motivators ‘do not create an enduring commitment to any value or action’ but rather rewards buy only ‘temporary compliance’. He goes onto argue that this may in fact be detrimental to organisational success as rewards only motivate people to seek greater rewards while important attributes of successful managers such as creativity and risk taking are replaced by simplicity and predictability in actions. The reward becomes an end in itself and the motivation is there for earnings and performance management to be carried out, especially due to the fact that the directors are privy to information which the shareholders (principal) will only know if the directors choose to truthfully reveal it.

This paper appears to be highly selective in its selection of examples to demonstrate the failure of motivation theories. Kohn looked at the response of a group of welders at a Midwestern manufacturing company to the removal of financial incentives and came to the conclusion that financial incentives diminished productivity as productivity was seen to increase in the aftermath of the removal of the incentive scheme. Unfortunately, Kohn appears all too easily to rule out the simplest of explanations, that this ineffectiveness of the incentive scheme may have been due to ineffectual implementation. For example, an investigation into the introduction of the first performance related pay scheme at the Inland Revenue by LSE researchers found that the system failed to improve performance and rid inefficiencies at the organisation and arrived at the conclusion that the incentive scheme had in fact slightly reduced performance for some individuals and this was due to a lack of belief in the equity of the reward scheme together with a lack of understanding as to how rewards were allocated/ awarded. Thus we can see that by looking at two similar results we can arrive at two very different explanations and there may in fact be nothing wrong with the underlying basis of incentive systems but merely inappropriate implementation for the particular setting (something which Kohn underplays).

Join now!

‘No artificial incentive can ever match the power of intrinsic motivation. People who do exceptional work may be glad to be paid and even more glad to be paid well, but they do not work to collect a pay cheque. They work because they love what they do’.

Although this may be true to some extent in that ‘intrinsically motivating jobs require less compensation than intrinsically less motivating jobs’1, people nonetheless require a wage.

Nursing is arguably one of the most intrinsically motivating professions yet nursing in the UK is in crisis due to a shortage ...

This is a preview of the whole essay