• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22

TATA STEEL CORUS DEAL: An Analysis

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

TATA STEEL - CORUS DEAL: An Analysis Contents Deal Background 3 TATA STEEL - An Overview 3 Operations 3 Key Strengths 3 Long Term Strategy 4 CORUS - An Overview 4 Operations 4 Market focus 5 Target Selection: Rationale 5 Key points that point to success of the merger vis a vis other simlar mergers (TCL and CNOOC from China perspective) 8 Deal Negotiation & Bidding 9 Valuation and Financing 9 Analysis/Justification of the Deal 11 Tata's Viewpoint 11 Stock Market reaction 11 Analysts & Investment banker's Reaction 13 Media Reaction 15 Credit Rating Agencies Reaction 15 The Deal was Cheaper @ � 6.08 per share 15 Our Analysis of Deal Value 17 Integration Process and Post Merger Events 18 Integration Processes 19 Industry's View on possible Integration Issues 19 Integration Measures by Tatas 19 Post-merger targets for Tata-Corus 20 Conclusion 20 Appendix 21 References 22 Deal Background TATA STEEL - An Overview Established in 1907, Tata Steel is Asia's first and India's largest private sector steel company. Tata Steel is among the lowest cost producers of steel in the world and one of the few select steel companies in the world that is EVA+. Operations Its captive raw material resources and the state-of-the-art 5 MTPA (million tonne per annum) plant at Jamshedpur, in Jharkhand State, India give it a competitive edge. Determined to be a major global steel player, Tata Steel has recently included in its fold NatSteel, Asia (2 MTPA) and Millennium Steel (now Tata Steel Thailand) (1.7 MTPA) creating a manufacturing network in eight markets in South East Asia and Pacific rim countries. Soon the Jamshedpur plant will expand its capacity from 5 MTPA to 7 MTPA by 2008. The Company plans to enhance its capacity, manifold through organic growth and investments. The Company's wire manufacturing unit in Sri Lanka is known as Lanka Special Steel, while the joint venture in Thailand for limestone mining is known as Sila Eastern. ...read more.

Middle

Tata Steel's B Muthuraman has defended the deal arguing that the enterprise value (EV) per tonne of capacity is not very high. The EV per tonne for the Tata-Corus deal is around $710 is only modestly higher than the Mittal-Arcelor deal. Besides, setting up new steel plants would cost anywhere between $1,200 and $1,300 per tonne and would take at least five years in most developing countries. The enterprise valuation of Corus at around $13.5 billion appears too steep based on the recent financial performance of Corus. Tata Steel is paying 7 times EBITDA of Corus for 2005 and a higher 9 times EBITDA for 12 months ended 30 September 2006. In comparison, Mittal Steel acquired Arcelor at an EBITDA multiple of around 4.5. Considering the fact that Arcelor has much superior assets, wider market reach and is financially much stronger than Corus, the price paid by Tata Steel looks almost obscenely high. Stock Market reaction Going by the stock market reaction yesterday, the acquisition is a big blunder. The stock tanked 10.5 per cent after the deal was announced and another 1.6 per cent today. Investors are worried about the financial risks of such a costly deal.Most of the leading stock brokerages have downgraded the stock while some have come out with recommendations to sell. While a majority of analysts are willing to concede that the acquisition makes strategic sense and may pay off in the long term, the consensus view is that stock price of Tata Steel would remain depressed in the short to medium term because of the higher financial risks. The first graph below shows the stock price performance during the deal and the second one shows till date. Investors, meanwhile, dumped Tata Steel shares with unrelenting fury in trading on the Bombay Stock Exchange, where the benchmark stock index fell about 1%. Tata Steel shares were pounded down 11%. ...read more.

Conclusion

Performance of Corus and ability of Tata steel to lower sourcing costs for Corus * Organic expansion through Greenfield projects by Tata * Post-merger integration and quashing of cultural issues Considering that global demand is on the increase and India will lead the domestic demand for Tata Steel, it can be safely said that the cyclicity of the steel industry will not go against the success of the merger. The steel industry will remain on top of the cycle for quite some time to come and this will enable Tata Steel to overcome the inertia of the merger and realize the expected synergies through increased efficiency of operation for Corus as well. It is crucial that Tata steel is unrelenting in its pursuit of expansion of capacity through organic methods like Greenfield projects. These projects will ensure that Tata-Corus will be in the top-3 steel manufacturing entities in the world by 2015. This would also ensure sufficient immunity against falling steel prices and the cyclicity of the steel industry. However, the raging cultural issues that lie beneath the surface of this merger could undo all the good work put in by the combine. However, the Tatas having faced similar problems with the integration of Tetley and having had a good track record in the past in post-merger integration would do a good job. So, based on the analysis Tata-Corus deal should be a success if they are able to successfully integrate Corus with Tata Steel and realize the projected synergies. Presently the market reactions and our analysis indicates a positive perception for the deal but only time will tell the actual outcome. Appendix 1) World Steel Output Global Steel output (in million tonnes) Country 2005 2006 % change China 355.8 418.8 17.7 Japan 112.5 116.2 3.3 US 94.9 98.5 3.8 Russia 66.1 70.6 6.8 South Korea 47.8 48.4 1.3 Germany 44.5 47.2 6.1 India 40.9 44.0 7.6 Ukraine 38.6 40.8 5.7 Italy 29.4 31.6 7.5 Brazil 31.6 30.9 (2.2) World production 1,028.8 1,120.7 8. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Management Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Management Studies essays

  1. Marks & Spencer China

    But, it stays at this time 43 million of unemployed. Therefore, lots of companies have been created but few of these offer good conditions of work concerning the wage, the hours of work the environment, the social protection. Thus, the workers are in a delicate situation with little unions to help them.

  2. Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) have been recognised as one of the ...

    The main reason of a small scale industry is to achieve self reliance by utilizing the resources available and harnessing the skills of local people to lay a platform that yields a steady income. The industries are characterized by the wise utilization of labor for the commodity production and the

  1. Legrand Company Analysis. Legrand is the global specialist in electrical and digital building infrastructures.

    In 2007, Legrand registered more than 80 new patents. The average life-span of Legrand's utility patent portfolio is approximately eight years, which corresponds to the average life-span of patents held by the Group's competitors in its accessible market. Legrand rarely licenses the use of its products to third parties, nor does it license use of technologies from third parties.

  2. Pidilite distribution structure. Pidilite is Indias largest manufacturer of adhesive.

    branded commodities by showing them discount on Pidilite products.On these unbranded goods,he heavily charges premium,which more than offset his loss in selling fevicol below cost price. * Presence of a strong brand like Fevicol increases his shop visisbility and credibility.

  1. Donner Company is a Service oriented Manufacturing Company that makes printed circuit boards as ...

    * The standard labour time for select order sizes are :- o Order size of 1 boards ==> 383.4 Labour minutes per board o Order size of 8 boards ==> 76.9 Labour minutes per board o Order size of 20 boards ==> 34.6 Labour minutes per board o Order size

  2. PEST analysis of uk mobile network industry

    Also, with increasing mobile phone users and the need for network operators to improve coverage, more and more masts have being erected around the country. Currently, there are 51 300 base station sites which may rise to 52 500 by the end of 200929.

  1. The 21st Century Jet - The Boeing 777

    Certification of the GE configuration was completed on November 9, 1995, with delivery to British Airways on November 11, 1995. The Rolls-Royce Trent 800 engine tests will be conducted on Cathay Pacific Airways aircraft, and certification of the Rolls-Royce equipped 777 is expected in January 1996, with first delivery going to Thai Airways International.

  2. Case Study - Why did Kennecott buy Peabody? Was the acquisition successful in achieving ...

    Additionally, change in networking capital should be removed and capital expenditures should be subtracted. Therefore, the cashflows being discounted are inappropriate. For example, if you take the share price that First Boston thought they could justify of $85 and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work