- Level: University Degree
- Subject: Business and Administrative studies
- Word count: 1735
The goal of this article is to check theory of growth rate of GDP. According to the theory growth rate of GDP is negatively related to the initial level of real per capita GDP and positively related to the size of the country
Extracts from this document...
Introduction
GPD growth rate Introduction Level of GDP is considered to be one of the most important macroeconomic indicators of a country?s development. Therefore government officials, investors and scientists are interested in determining the key growth characteristics of GDP. The goal of this article is to check theory of growth rate of GDP. According to the theory growth rate of GDP is negatively related to the initial level of real per capita GDP and positively related to the size of the country (geometric mean for the period). Growth rate is positively related to stability of property rights (represented by the rank in the index ?rule of law?) but inversely related to government consumption and fertility rate. In some growth models a countries GDP growth rate is negatively correlated to the starting per capita GDP. The main explanation is that the lower the starting per capita GDP, the higher the marginal return on the capital. Thus, countries with lower per capita GDP tend to grow at higher rates. The size of the country is positively related to the growth rate of GDP. This is because the larger the labour market of the country, the more favourable the country is for new investments in production facilities. Investments in the economy are also determined by the stability of property rights. Intuitively clear that the more an investor is sure in property rights the larger the investments in the country. As a proxy for stability of property rights I used Rule of Law rank that indicates the country's rank among all countries covered by the aggregate indicator, with 0 corresponding to lowest rank (poor legal protection), and 100 to highest rank (the best legal protection). ...read more.
Middle
It is also possible to ignore multicolleniarity as the model overall is viable and coefficients are having appropriate signs. Table 3. Correlation matrix There is notable correlation between R&L and GDP_PC and Fertility and GDP_PC GDP_PC Fertility Population GConsumption R&L GDP_PC 1.00 -0.58 -0.11 0.44 0.79 Fertility -0.58 1.00 -0.06 -0.34 -0.52 Population -0.11 -0.06 1.00 -0.11 -0.05 GConsumption 0.44 -0.34 -0.11 1.00 0.52 R&L 0.79 -0.52 -0.05 0.52 1.00 Estimation of the full model Table 4 Estimation of the model Name Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. Constant 2.83 0.736522 3.85 0.00 GDP_PC -0.09 0.026852 -3.51 0.00 Fertility -0.16 0.13481 -1.19 0.23 Population 0.003 0.001359 2.72 0.00 GConsumption -0.06 0.03356 -2.01 0.04 R&L 0.02 0.009376 3.06 0.00 R-squared 0.41 F-statistic 11.41 Adjusted R-squared 0.37 Prob(F-statistic) 0.00 S.E. of regression 1.22 Sum squared resid 122.47 The F statistic of the model (please refer to Table 4) equals to 11.41 with corresponding p-value of 0.00. Therefore the hypotheses that all coefficients except intercept are equal to 0 should be rejected. The explanatory power of the model denoted by the r-squared and adjusted R-squared totals to 0.41 and 0.37 accordingly. That is acceptable result for that kind of models. Sum of squares residuals totals to 122 As expected the coefficient before variable GDP_PC is negative. According to the specification of the model the coefficient is -0.09 with standard error 0.02. That means that every increase of initial per capita GDP on 1 thousand USD leads to reduction of 0.09% of the growth rate of GDP. ...read more.
Conclusion
The critical values are: DL= 1.55 DU=1.74.We decide whether there is autocorrelation from the test because the statistic is between 4-DU= 2.26 and 4-DL=2.45. The Breusch-Godfrey statistics with 1 lag is equal to 2.31 with corresponding p-value of 0.12. Therefore we cannot reject the hypothesis that there is no autocorrelation. 1. Disturbances are uncorrelated with regressors. The disturbance of the regression is the variance that is not explained by the model. There may be another regressors that are important for the model and explain the disturbances. In that case estimated coefficients are biased and inconsistent. However I am not awere of an economic theory that could add additional explanation to the possible correlation. Therefore I neglect this problem further. 1. The disturbances are normally distributed. In order to test that assumption I have conducted Jarque-Bera test. Jarque-Bera statistics amounts to 1.23 with corresponding p-value of 0.53. Therefore the hypotheses that the distribution of disturbances is normal should not be rejected. Test for the joint hypothesis To check the hypotheses that two coefficients GConsumption and R&L are equal to 0 we should use F test. The null hypothesis is GConsumption = R&L = 0, alternative hypotheses is that GConsumption 0 or R&L 0. F statistics totals to 5.23 with corresponding p-value amounting to 0.007. Therefore, we may reject the null hypothesis at 1% significance level. Conclusion The aim of this article is to understand what influences the GDP growth rate. I have considered the model and found that starting level of GDP per capita, population of the country, government consumption and stability of property rights influence GDP growth rate. Also I found out that fertility rate has no effect on GPD growth rate. ...read more.
This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Applied Economics section.
Found what you're looking for?
- Start learning 29% faster today
- 150,000+ documents available
- Just £6.99 a month