• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The UK Demand for Money 1963-1989 Econometrics for Economists

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The UK Demand for Money 1963-1989 Econometrics for Economists (2030003) Exam: 57230 Index: Introduction Econometric analysis can be used to help explain the importance of certain factors on a dependent variable. In this project the dependent variable is the "demand for money in the UK between 1963-1989". Although it is very difficult, if not impossible to find perfect econometric models, this project will attempt to explain the relationship between the demand for money and other various explanatory factors. The Economic Theory Money is one of many forms of wealth. A simply economic explanation, using two of the more important forms of wealth, is that people have a choice between holding money and holding bonds. Money is used for everyday transactions and includes currency (coins and notes) and checkable deposits. Bonds will pay an interest rate but cannot be used for transactions, i.e. you cannot buy a cup of coffee with a bond. The interacting relationship between money and its substitutes (bonds being an example) can help explain the demand for money. The measure of money in this project is the liquid money, M1. The demand for M1 will basically depend on the opportunity cost of not holding M1 money, i.e. ...read more.

Middle

Dummy variables could be used to distinguish between other external variables such as the type of government in power at the time but this would be an unnecessary complication. Because this is a "log-linear" model, the coefficients will be a measure of elasticity. The regression will cover the time period, i.e. from 1963_1 to 1989_2 (Note: 1983_3/4 will not be included due to incomplete data) Hypotheses The variables will each be tested for individual significance and the overall strength of the model will also be measured. After the initial regression the model will be tested for problems such as autocorrelation, multicollinearity and misspecification bias. The model shall also be tested in the long run. As mentioned before, if there is sufficient time the ca variable will be looked at. Estimation The regression results from our original basic model are reproduced in appendix, (a). The signs of the two explanatory variables are as expected, i.e. the level of disposable income has a positive relationship with the demand for money while the interest rate has a negative one. The t-values obtained from the coefficients of RNET and IA reject the null hypothesis that they are individually insignificant at both the 5% and 1% level of significance. ...read more.

Conclusion

= 1539 [0.000]** log-likelihood 292.988 DW 2.01 no. of observations 103 no. of parameters 12 mean(ma-pa) 10.8974 var(ma-pa) 0.0370415 Error autocorrelation coefficients in auxiliary regression: Lag Coefficient Std.Error 1 0.34614 0.9412 2 0.48134 0.6174 3 -0.23942 0.2097 4 0.16274 0.1137 5 0.21758 0.1099 RSS = 0.0188337 sigma = 0.000218997 Testing for error autocorrelation from lags 1 to 5 Chi^2(5) = 7.9075 [0.1614] and F-form F(5,86) = 1.4303 [0.2216] Testing for heteroscedasticity using squares Chi^2(22)= 20.089 [0.5774] and F-form F(22,68) = 0.74893 [0.7728] APPENDIX (d) EQ( 3) Modelling ma-pa by OLS (using dataset3.in7) The estimation sample is: 1963 (4) to 1989 (2) Coefficient Std.Error t-value t-prob Part.R^2 ma-pa_1 0.909460 0.01242 73.2 0.000 0.9819 Constant 0.120873 0.1260 0.960 0.340 0.0092 RNET -0.743990 0.05791 -12.8 0.000 0.6251 ia 0.0864331 0.009326 9.27 0.000 0.4645 sigma 0.0149187 RSS 0.0220341891 R^2 0.994225 F(3,99) = 5681 [0.000]** log-likelihood 289.019 DW 2.46 no. of observations 103 no. of parameters 4 mean(ma-pa) 10.8974 var(ma-pa) 0.0370415 Error autocorrelation coefficients in auxiliary regression: Lag Coefficient Std.Error 1 -0.25767 0.1024 2 -0.053333 0.1055 3 -0.079404 0.1061 4 0.11792 0.1063 5 0.20319 0.1029 RSS = 0.0196544 sigma = 0.000209089 Testing for error autocorrelation from lags 1 to 5 Chi^2(5) = 11.125 [0.0490]* and F-form F(5,94) = 2.2764 [0.0531] Testing for heteroscedasticity using squares Chi^2(6) = 7.3739 [0.2876] and F-form F(6,92) = 1.1824 [0.3226] ?? ?? ?? ?? Exam Number: 57230 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Accounting section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Accounting essays

  1. Financial Analysis

    3-1 Share price of Orbital from 2003-2007 3-4 Financial Performance Analysis Balance Sheet- See Appendix A-2 Income Statement- See Appendix B-2 Horizontal Analysis 2006 2005 2004 2003 Total Revenue (million) 11.86 11.48 16.76 46.47 Net Income (million) 0.52 -1.7 3.41 -1.87 Total Revenue (million)

  2. Financial statement analysis

    70,246 87,875 102,118 124,399 Revenue to Operating Assets (%) 460.89% 430.15% 429.99% 354.31% COLORADO 2001 2002 2003 2004 Total Costs ('000 AUD) 303,479 357,173 409,454 402,457 Interest Costs ('000 AUD) 1,255 1,750 2,333 1,643 Operating Costs 302,224 355,423 407,121 400,814 COLORADO 2001 2002 2003 2004 Operating Costs ('000 AUD)

  1. Two-page report if an aggressive takeover should occur on Fortescue Metals Group Ltd (FMG)

    Considering that one ton of pig iron corresponds to 1.9 tons of finished ores, 228 million tons of finished ores will be in need by 2010. It is estimated that the number of built and rebuilt mines will not be increased notably and moreover the currently operated mines tend to decrease their production (2~3 million tons annually).

  2. Accounting note 1

    item is greater than the value from knowing it, it can be omitted. Thus, the cost of operating a division may not include any of the company president's salary, even though the president spends time overseeing the division's activities. It would simply be too expensive for the president to account for each minute spent on each different activity he undertakes.

  1. Agency Theory

    frauds in history which was Enron corporations and its auditors Arthur Anderson LLP. Enron's lengthily relationship with it auditors Arthur Anderson has consequently lead them to a series of events driven by behind scenes deals, hidden by questionable accounting. Many employees lost their jobs and banks and lenders lost millions

  2. An Analysis Of harmonization issues of accounting standards

    1.3 Research Questions Some companies are listed on overseas exchanges in China and the shares companies issue overseas are known as N-shares (New York), H-shares (Hong Kong) etc. few of the companies issue special shares, only for the foreign investors.

  1. Accounting Final Project - analysis of three companies in the UK telecommunication sector.

    It shows how much the company earns after factoring out the costs of goods sold or costs of provision of services. * Net profit margin: This is a measure of returns from operations and other expenditures. This is the most valuable measure of profitability as it shows how much earnings

  2. Capital budgeting: advantages and limitations

    It may give different rates of return; in essence it entails more problems than a practitioner may think. 3. It could be quite misleading if there is no large initial cash outflow. 2.6 The Real Options Approach The real options approach applies financial options theory (the best known form is the Black-Scholes model)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work