Upon joining the organisation, the candidate will engage in a process of induction and training. Some organisations recognise the value in “encouraging workers to enhance their skills and knowledge, and to foster their creativity and initiative as part of a drive for continuous improvement” (Marchington, 2005). Training invests in and develops human resources, as well as increasing employee commitment, developing the employee as an individual and increasing their skill sets both in general and company specific. This helps the organisation to meet goals, increase productivity, encourage new ideas within the organisational environment, and change management, attitudes, and products. As an example, in comparison to countries such as Germany, Britain invests poorly into training for its employees, which has been proved to limit career progression as there is less awareness for training needs. Training treats behaviour as a problem and solves it through a systematic predetermined path, is short term, skill specific, concentrates on task thinking and focuses on the organisation. On the other hand, development prepares people for work beyond what currently engages them, is long term, develops the individual, concentrates on deep thinking, and develops the whole person as opposed to just in relation to the organisation.
Although individuals may go through the process of training and development, it is difficult to prove productivity, and training may be seen as a cost rather than an investment. “Simply having appropriate skilled individuals does not automatically yield high performance” (Reid, 2004 p.243). However, good staff are retained, there are long term benefits, and a flexible workforce is created. There is a wide range of training methods available, such as; role plays, apprenticeships, in-house training courses, assisted group learning, and education, and they are all analysed in different ways. Employees may be given personal development plans, including their aspirations regarding personal development, keeping track of their achievements, and focusing on learning and development opportunities. This is an ongoing process and has the effect of optimising an individual’s career. Despite the fact that a group of individuals may be given the same training, the way an individual learns during training is influenced by different theories and perspectives.
It is easy to see how the nature of the work that employees are required to perform will lead to the acceptance of a particular view of learning. A distinction is usually made between ‘associative learning’ (behaviourism) and ‘cognitive learning’ (Bratton, 2007). The behaviourist approach to learning proposes that “learning is the process by which a particular stimulus, repeatedly associated with, or conditioned by, desirable or understandable experiences, comes to evoke a particular response” (Beardwell, 2007, p. 273). This conditioning comes in two forms; classical and operant conditioning. Classical conditioning occurs when a stimulus leads to an automatic response, for example, Pavlov demonstrated that dogs could be conditioned to salivate at the sound of a bell rung before food is presented. Operant conditioning takes place after a desired response, which is then reinforced, or rewarded, to increase the probability of the repetition of the same response when the stimulus recurs, as shown by Skinner. In this way, the employee’s behaviour can be modified and also be shaped to conform to the organisation. Cognitive learning theory offers a more complex understanding of learning, proposing that what is learned is not an association of stimulus with response, but of stimulus with stimulus. The learner, or employee, develops expectations that stimuli are linked, which results in a cognitive ‘map’ or latent learning. This theory also recognises the role in learning of the observation and imitation of the behaviour of others; this could be seen through an organisation giving an employee a mentor or buddy to work alongside. Similarly to the ongoing process of employee development is performance management and appraisal, which ensures that a person’s overall capabilities and potential are appraised.
Appraisal can be defined as “a process that provides an analysis of a person’s overall capabilities and potential, allowing informed decisions to be made for particular purposes” (Bratton, 2007, p.284). A vital part of the process is assessment, whereby data on an individual’s past and current work performance and behaviour are collected and reviewed. There are also a variety of other declared purposes and benefits of appraisal, including setting goals and targets, discipline, selecting people for promotion, improving motivation and morale, planning remedial actions, and so on (Bratton, 2007). The list of potential purposes for appraisal has led to the view that appraisal is something of a ‘panacea’ in organisations (Taylor, 1998). Although there are a number of benefits of appraisal, there is always the situation when a manager has to provide feedback to employees that may demotivate them. The study that highlighted this was carried out by Meyer et al. (1965) at the General Electric Company, and this showed criticism had a negative effect on performance. Line managers usually have the most contact with employees, and so are the best people to carry out the process of appraisal. However, companies such as the Royal Automobile Club (RAC) also ask their employees to evaluate their own performance, as they feel that this is highly beneficial for personal appraisal and development. An organisation selects the method of appraisal according to the individuals, and the method they feel is the most effective. The evaluation process can also include peer, group, comparison, critical incident, graphic rating, grading, or a combination of one or more appraisal methods (Mondy, 1996).
The process of appraisal uses behaviourally-anchored rating scales, and focuses on behaviour and what the individual does or is expected to do. Although this is a useful tool for management, it is difficult to measure and is considered as costly and time consuming. A development action programme can give an individual self-control of performance, as a maintenance action programme can identify and rectify deviation (Cummings, 1973). An example of this is performance training at the Disney Institute in Florida, where employees are encouraged to have self-control over their performance and share their ideas, which contributed to a collaborative culture within the Institute (Bratton, 2007). Ultimately, the process of an appraisal will affect different individuals in different ways. For example, if management feel the individual has performed well within their role and presents a number of skills and abilities, they are likely to receive a pay rise and may be considered for promotion within the organisation as well as a number of other rewards. Whereas if the individual is not performing as they should be, they may be inclined to review the individuals position within the company and be put through a disciplinary procedure.
Evidentially individual differences have a great effect on Human Resource Management procedures such as recruitment, appraisal, training and development. Although employees are the main reason for the individual methods and variations of HR processes, management may also be an influential factor. For example, Kurt Lewin’s Leadership styles, including ‘Autocratic’, ‘Participative’, and ‘Laissez Faire’, may influence a number of HR processes, as individual differences in managerial styles are present. It is also apparent that HR is an ongoing process, as employees are regularly recruited, assessed in the way they perform, and given training to develop as an individual along with the organisation as a whole. These processes are linked, have an effect on each other, and are all needed in order for an organisation to be successful.
Part B
As Junction Hotel has changed from a small independent hotel to a franchise of the Hilvomada chain, a number of their Human Resources processes would also have to change to fit in with the new organisation.
Firstly, the recruitment process would need to be altered to fit in with the new branding of Junction Hotel, as it is important that the type of staff they have are suited to their environment. Adam Chance refers to getting rid of some of the ‘deadwood’, which would imply that the current workforce is not up to the required standard for the transformation of Junction Hotel to a franchise. It is vital for an organisation to recruit and select the right people through assessment, as some individuals will be more suited to certain jobs and the organisation than others. In terms of cultural changes within the organisation, there will be a different view of the organisations values, norms and beliefs, which will also have an effect on the type of person who would apply for a job. As Junction Hotel needs a new leader, it would be useful to apply Kurt Lewin’s theory and analyse the strengths and weaknesses of each candidate’s leadership style, and which person would be best suited for the environment of the organisation.
In terms of training and development needs for the year ahead, various methods may be used depending on the specific job role. For example, kitchen and waiting staff could visit another Hilvomada Hotel from the chain of franchise’s in order to familiarise themselves with the organisations procedures. As is explained in the cognitive theory, the employees would observe and imitate the behaviour of others, and bring this skill back with them to use within their branch of the hotel. To increase a collaborative culture within the hotel, group training methods could be used such as role plays, as this would create a flexible workforce and help the staff to familiarise with each other. If development processes were used, both general and company specific skills would be increased.
In order to provide an analysis of Junction Hotel staff members’ overall capabilities and potential, appraisal and performance development would take place. This would allow for areas of improvement to be highlighted in order to improve the performance of the staff and therefore maintain the quality of performance within the hotel. If staff were given performance incentives such as a pay rise, the probability of repetition of the same response would be increased, as in the theory of operant conditioning.
By following a suitable process of HRM to suit the organisation, the transition to a franchise of the Hilvomada chain would become more efficient.
Reference
Beardwell, J. and Clayton, T. (2007). Human Resource Management: Contemporary Approach. 5thed. Essex: Pearson.
Bratton, J., and GOLD, J. (2007). 4th ed. Human Resource Management: Theory and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Cummings, L. and Schwab, D. (1973). Performance in Organizations: Determinants and Appraisals. Glenview: Illinois.
Kersley, B., Alpin, C., Forth, J., Bryson, A., Bewley, H., Dix, G. and Oxenbridge, S. (2005). Inside the Workplace: First findings from the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey.
Knights, D. and Willmott, H. (2007). Introducing Organizational Behaviour and Management London: Thomson: Chapter 3.
Marchington, M. and Wilkinson, A. (2005). Human Resource Management at Work: People Management and Development 3rded. Essex: Pearson.
Mondy, R. and Noe, M. (1996). Human Resource Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Newell, H. And Scarborough, H. (2001). HRM in Context: A Case Study Approach. New York: Palgrave
Reid, M.A., Barrington, H. and Brown, M. (2004). Human Resource Development: Beyond Training Interventions. London: CIPD.
Stewart, J. and Knowles, V. (2000). ‘Graduate recruitment and selection processes in small businesses.’ Career Development International Volume 5/1: 21-38.
Taylor, S. (1998). Employee Resourcing. London: Institute of Personnel Development.
Torrington, D., Hall, L. and Taylor, S. (2005). Human Resource Management 6thed. Essex. Pearson
Bibliography
Beaumont, P. (1993). Human Resource Management: Key Concepts and Skills. London: Sage.
Beer, M., Lawrence, P.R., Mills, D.Q., and Walten, R.E. (1984). Managing Human Assets, Free Press.
Bratton, J., and Gold, J. (1999). Human Resource Management: Theory and Practice. 2nded. Basingstoke: Palgrave
Cherrington, David J. (1995). The Management of Human Resources. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Cooper, D. (2003). Recruitment and Selection: A Framework for success. London, Thompson.
Cox, A. (2008). Valuing Individual Differences- Key to Team Success [Online]. Available at: http://www.articlesbase.com/business-articles/valuing-individual-differences-key-to-team-success-539957.html#axzz0m7d9Jmge [Accessed 22 April 2010]
Coyne, B., (2007). Why is recruitment important? [Online]. Available at: http://handbooks.homeless.org.uk/resettlement/service/recruitment/introduction [Accessed 23 April 2010]
Foundations of Managing and Organising: Theme Booklet 4.
French, R., Rayner, C., Rees, R. And Rumbles, S (2008). Organizational Behaviour Chichester: John Wiley and Sons: Chapter 2
Holbeche, L. (1998). Motivating People in Lean Organisations. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
Nadler, L., and Wiggs, D. (1986). Managing Human Resource Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Price, A. (2004). Human Resource Management in a Business Context 2nded. London. Thompson