• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is leadership dependant on the personality of the individual manager? What are the implications of your answer for managerial practices?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent is leadership dependant on the personality of the individual manager? What are the implications of your answer for managerial practices? A great deal has been written about leadership throughout the course of the twentieth century. Some would have us believe, that the study of leadership is a modern obsession (Huczynski and Buchanan, 2001), however, the subject is not a new one. Machiavelli's The Prince (1513) and The Art of War by Sun Tzu, written in the 6th century BC, demonstrate that mankind's interest in leadership, has existed for as long as there have been organisations and individuals required to lead them. The debate surrounding the issue of whether leaders are born or made has been at the heart of writing on the subject throughout its history. Essentially, the question is: Is leadership a skill that can be acquired through education and experience, or an innate ability that can simply be identified and encouraged to develop? The implications for managerial practices, should leadership be proven to be innate, could be monumental, as leadership is fundamental to organisational management. The writing and theories concerning the subject cover all points of the spectrum, between those that purport leadership to be entirely dependant upon personality, to those that believe leadership is about implementation of learned techniques and totally independent of personality. The initial theories were positioned at the opposing extremes, although they have evolved to acknowledge that leadership is a combination, of both personality and technique. Leadership as an innate ability The first school of thought to emerge in the early 1900's was that of Trait Spotting, which argues leadership is wholly innate. The basis for Trait Spotting is Great Man Theory, the concept that throughout history great leaders have arisen to guide organisations to success, or, away from disaster. It suggests that when selecting future leaders, organisations should look for certain character traits associated with leadership ability. There are a number of alternative lists of essential traits, compiled through observation of successful leaders. ...read more.


Quoted in Peters and Waterman, Burns describes the principle of the style: Leaders and followers raise one another to higher levels of motivation... (Burns, 1978, cited by Peters and Waterman, 1982 p. 83) The newer styles of leadership represent a broadening of the scope of traditional style theory from the initial standpoint, that leadership has no connection with personality, to one that acknowledges both technique and personality. This corresponds with the moves by Goleman (1998) and others to shift trait theory in the opposite direction. Despite the improvements the new theories still perform inconsistently when applied to the real world. Transformational leadership for example, relies upon the ability of the leader to instil common goals amongst their followers, in line with those of the organisation. However, no matter how enthusiastic or charismatic the leader, it may simply prove impossible to achieve this. Although the new theories do not provide the answers themselves, they may have uncovered an important new aspect to the leadership debate. Their increased focus upon the role of the follower, has led some to realise, that in addition to the roles played by the personality and technique of the leader, the corresponding attributes of their followers may prove as, if not more, important, in determining their leadership's success. Leadership through followers Many have offered their definition of a leader or leadership, Handy suggests: Someone who is able to develop and communicate a vision which gives meaning to the work of others. (Handy, 1993 p. 117) Whereas Kotter (2001) says leaders are simply individuals who guide organisations through periods of change. As yet a succinct definition of leadership has not been generally agreed. Perhaps it is unsurprising then that there is little agreement about other aspects of the subject. In fact all that is widely agreed upon is that to be a leader an individual must possess one thing, followers. Initially, this appears to be a statement of the obvious, well it is, but this seemingly insignificant piece of information may hold the key. ...read more.


The combination of personality and technique will depend upon the individual. Some will be primarily noted for their personality, others for their technique. It is important to remember the role of the follower as, whilst leadership ability may be dependant upon personality and technique, the ability to lead is in the hands of those that follow (Brown, 2003). Leaders should therefore be able to adapt, both their technique and themselves to the expectations of their followers. Furthermore, neither personality, nor knowledge and experience, can be considered discreet variables. Personality is rarely left unaffected by experience gained or knowledge obtained. Less obvious, but equally true, is the concept that all we experience and all that we learn is filtered by our personality. How often do two individuals' memories of a shared experience differ significantly? This is due to their personality, inclining them to place differing emphasis upon each piece of information to which they are exposed. In summary, all that can be said with certainty is that leadership generally, is neither completely dependent nor independent of personality. However, the extent of the influence of personality upon leadership, in the case of the individual, is, dependent upon the manager. The implications of this answer do not directly affect upon any managerial practice only the method by which they are chosen. To this extent is it imperative that the view of followers be taken into account, as it is they who hold the key to any leader's success. Comment Attention should also be paid to the direction in which a leader is taking those who follow. History has shown that some of the most successful leaders have led their organisations into disastrous situations. Adolf Hitler's leadership ability enabled him to lead the German people into committing acts of the most insane cruelty and ultimately to the bitterest of defeats. Paling into insignificance by comparison, the recent situations at companies like Enron, WorldCom and Marconi have demonstrated that the dangers of unquestioned leadership remain just as relevant today as they were in Machiavelli or Sun Tzu's day. Perhaps this is another job for followership. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Management Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Management Studies essays

  1. "Learders are born, not made", do you agree or disagree with this statement. Explain.

    The process of leadership is totally based on trust if other don't trust you they will not follow you in every instance and they will decide in each situation whether to trust you or not so to develop trust in other people a person can learn with the change of time that the person can not learn by birth only.

  2. Critically analyse management and leadership theories over the last century, commenting on the extend ...

    He avoided the word "rules" because he did not want to encourage any idea of rigidity, indicating that in organizational administration, everything is a matter of position held. In addition to Henri Fayol's works on Classical Management Theory, more researches has been carried out by Max Weber (1864-1920), Mary Parker Follet (1868-1933)


    Basically, trait and experience are to be the two most important factors being a successful leader. And the most effective way is learning through experience and then builds on the natural talent. Conclusion In conclusion, both inherit traits and acquired skill could be the attributes to be a leader.


    - Identification: This is where we associate ourselves with a certain group. - Comparison: This is where we compare our group with another. According to Professor Alex Haslem 2005, without social identity, there cannot be a leader. Any leader, in order to become successful, will have to make a group where we (as followers)

  1. Leadership Theories - this review seeks to determine which theoretical perspectives, theories and schools ...

    The categories of theoretical perspectives are compared with other classification schemes in the field and with levels of analysis and ontological and epistemological issues that have been addressed by the leadership literature.

  2. Comparing Leadership styles of Western and Asian Managers.

    volume and its subsequent editions have offered. Th? Handbooks seek t? provide ? systematic review ?f th? literature on leadership. Over 5,000 abstracts were prepared for th? first edition and only those which were judged t? be based on competent research were included-th?

  1. Servant Leadership Thesis

    For instance, Russell and Stone (2002) focuses on vision, communication, honesty and integrity, credibility, trust, competence, service, stewardship, modeling, visibility, pioneering, influence, persuasion, appreciation of others, listening, encouragement, teaching, and delegation. These areas of management seem very important and appear to focus on areas that make a good servant leader.

  2. Project Management. The aim of the report is to identify to what extent leadership ...

    Another management style leader's need apart from building and sustaining cooperative relationship is to lead by example (Appendix 2). 2.2 Project Leadership "Project leadership is defined as a presence and a process carried out within an organizational role that assumes responsibility for the needs and rights of those people who

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work