High transport costs have negative impacts on international trade and economic growth LLDCs. Firstly, high transport costs reduce profits from exporting products, and as a result reduce the countries’ level of income. They also cause inflation of the price of imported raw materials and semi-finished goods, which is particularly harmful if an economy is highly dependent on imported intermediate goods for production. Moreover, high transport costs also reduce the level of investment, both directly though increasing the costs of imported capital and indirectly through reducing the level of total savings that is available for investment. Both have a negative impact on growth in the long run. Secondly, high transport costs of LLDCs are also less likely to attract export-orientated FDI. Since trade and FDI are key channels of international knowledge diffusion, higher transport costs may lead to an economy to be further removed from the world technology frontiers and slow its rate of productivity growth. Thirdly, transport costs affect a country’s selection of trading partners. If export markets largely consist of poor, slow growing markets and there are significant costs (including transportation) of switching to new, richer,
and faster growing markets, countries maybe constrained in their growth potential.
The remoteness from major world markets is the principal reason why many landlocked developing countries have not been very successful in mitigating consequences caused by their geographical handicap vis-à-vis landlocked countries in Europe. The distances involved in most cases of landlocked developing countries are excessive. Kazakhstan has the longest distance from the sea (3750 km), followed by Afghanistan, Chad, Niger, Zambia and Zimbabwe with distances from the nearest sea coast in excess of 2000 km. Transit time for goods of landlocked developing countries is extremely long because of their long distance, difficult terrain, road and railway conditions and inefficiency of transit transport.
There is a clear correlation between distance and transport costs.
High transport costs erode the competitive edge of landlocked developing countries and trade volume. The trade reducing effect is strongest for transport intensive activities that are dependent on exports or imported intermediate goods for production. Most landlocked developing countries, if not all, are commodity exporters. Professors Sachs and Radelet argued that 5 percent increase in a country’s c.i.f./f.o.b ratio reduces the long-term growth of the share of non-primary manufactured exports in GDP by around 0.2 per cent per annum.
According to UNCTAD estimates based on the IMF balance of payment statistics, on average landlocked developing countries spent almost two times more of their export earnings for the payment of transport and insurance services in 1995 than the average for developing countries and three times more than the average of developed economies (see chart 1).
Chart 1
Source: computed from the IMF statistics on balance of payment
Compared to the post Uruguay Round MFN tariffs, high transport costs facing landlocked developing countries have become a far more restrictive barrier to trade for these countries than tariffs. Tariffs for QUAD countries (Canada, EU, Japan and USA) will range from 3 percent to 7 percent on goods originated from most landlocked developing countries. Then, landlocked developing countries on average pay almost three times higher for transport services than these tariffs. Most landlocked developing countries benefit from recent initiatives to provide greater market access for goods of least developed countries.
The international community is undertaking measures to address transit transport problems of landlocked and transit developing countries. These efforts include financial assistance in transport infrastructure by the World Bank, regional development banks, and bilateral assistance programmes; multilateral and bilateral technical assistance projects; trade facilitation measures promoted by UNCTAD, regional commissions, WTO and other relevant international, regional and professional organizations.
Landlocked and transit developing countries have continued to make significant investment in the infrastructure development, subject to availability of financial resources. The major sources of such investment, in the form of grant aid or soft loans, have been their development partners. The regional development banks, the World Bank, the European Union and Japan are among the lead contributors in this area.
For thirty landlocked developing countries as a whole for the 1990s transport sector commitments reached US$8.6 billion and constituted 11.8 percent of total commitments, as compared with US$50.2 billion and 13.4 percent for 34 transit developing countries. Physical infrastructure of all types constituted to 26.5 percent of all commitments for the thirty landlocked developing countries and 33.5 percent for the thirty-four transit developing countries.
Allocation of development assistance to transport and communication sector vary greatly from country to country, with Afghanistan is low along with Niger, Rwanda, Azerbaijan, Burundi, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Armenia, the former Republic of Macedonia, Swaziland and Bhutan. In contrast, Uganda, Kazakhstan, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Bolivia, Paraguay, the Lao PDR, the Central African Republic, Mongolia and Swaziland allocate relatively larger share of ODA to infrastructure development. Transport sector commitment as a percentage of GNP range from high 4.9 percent for the Lao PDR, 3.5 percent for Mongolia and 2.7 percent for the Central African Republic, to 13 other landlocked countries with between 1 percent and
2 percent, 14 countries with less than 1 percent.
The existence of a well-functioning transport system is a prerequisite not only for trade to take place, but also for foreign direct investment to be channelled to a specific country. Some of the main specific economic factors for selecting a host country for FDI are physical infrastructure and the availability of reliable and efficient transport and communication services. Chart 2 shows that for 30 landlocked developing countries received very small share of international foreign direct investment, inward flows of FDI stood at only US$4.6 billion or 0.34 percent of world flows in 2001. Kazakhstan received the highest amount of FDI among the landlocked developing countries with US$1.2 billion. The 15 landlocked developing countries in Africa received only US$984 million.
Chart 2
Source: Computed based on statistics in UNCTAD World Investment Report, 2001
While improvement of transport infrastructure is a long-term project, trade facilitation measures are crucial in reducing trade transaction costs by simplifying the requirements, harmonizing the procedures and documentations, standardizing commercial practices, and introducing agreed codes for the representation of information elements. The benefits from trade facilitation can be particularly important for landlocked countries because their goods have to move across additional borders. Documentation requirements often lack transparency and are vastly duplicative in many places, a problem often compounded by a lack of cooperation between traders and official agencies. Despite advances in information technology, automatic data submission is still not commonplace.
The objectives of the landlocked developing countries with respect to their transit services are (a) to secure unfettered access to the sea by all means of transport (b) to reduce costs and improve services so as to increase the competitiveness of their exports; (c) to reduce delivered costs of their imports; (d) to have routes free from delays and uncertainties; (e) to reduce enroute loss, damage, and deterioration;
(f) to open the way for export expansion.
Against this background the General Assembly in its resolution 57/242 decided to convene the International Ministerial Conference of Landlocked and Transit Developing Countries and Donor Countries and Financial and Development Institutions on Transit Transport Cooperation from 28 to 29 August 2003 in Almaty, Kazakhstan.
The General Assembly designated the High Representative for the Least Developed Countries, Landlocked Developing Countries and Small Island Developing States as the Secretary-General for the International Ministerial Conference and requested The Secretary-General of the Conference to organize all sessions of the preparatory committee, in close cooperation with the World Bank and UNCTAD.
The Secretary-General of the Conference was also requested to organize the intergovernmental and regional preparatory meeting in close cooperation with the Regional Commissions.
Mandate of the International Ministerial Meeting
In accordance with General Assembly resolution 56/180, the mandate of the Ministerial Conference is to:
i) review the current situation of transit transport systems, including the implementation of the 1995 Global Framework for Transit Cooperation and,
ii) formulate, inter alia, appropriate policy measures and action-oriented programmes aimed at developing efficient transit transport systems.
Intergovernmental Preparatory Committee
The International Ministerial Meeting shall be preceded by two sessions of the International Preparatory Committee. The sixth meeting of Governmental Experts from Landlocked and Transit Developing Countries and Representatives of Donor Countries and Financial and Development Institutions shall serve as the First Preparatory Committee. A three-day meeting of senior officials will act also as the Second Preparatory Committee. This meeting which will finalize substantive consultations for the outcome of the International Ministerial Conference will be held back-to-back with the Conference.
Participation at the international ministerial meeting and the preparatory process
The General Assembly in its resolution 57/242 invited organizations and bodies of the United Nations system, including UNCTAD and the regional commissions, the international financial and developments institution, in particular, the World Bank, and other relevant regional and international organizations and the international community to provide the necessary substantive, financial and technical support to the preparatory process and organization of the Conference and to participate actively. The Secretary-General of the Conference was invited to make the necessary arrangements to facilitate the meaningful participation of civil society, including the private sector, in the Conference and its preparatory meetings.
Resource mobilization
The General Assembly requested the Secretary-General of the United Nations to seek voluntary contributions to facilitate the preparation for the International Ministerial Conference, including the participation of representatives of landlocked and transit developing countries at the meeting;
Organizational approach for the Ministerial Conference
The establishment of efficient transit systems is an area where the United Nations could bring a tangible and measurable progress. Broad-based participatory approach is a key to success of the Ministerial Conference. The Ministerial Conference should be seen as United Nations system-wide joint undertaking with a single purpose of formulating a new agenda to develop efficient transit systems in various regions of the world. Consequently, efforts will be made to ensure that Governments, United Nations entities and other relevant organizations have a sense of ownership of the preparatory process as well as the outcome of the Ministerial Conference.
The Conference will be based on the existing intergovernmental mechanism at the sub-regional and regional levels as well as on substantive inputs from the major stakeholders such as UNCTAD, the Regional Commissions and the World Bank.
It necessitates visible and efficient coordination and mobilization of United Nations specialized agencies and other relevant international organizations, particularly the World Bank.
Preparatory meetings
The preparatory process of the International Ministerial Conference will be conducted at sub-regional, regional and global levels. The Secretary-General of the Conference will convene three regional meetings by latest April 2003: The African Regional Meeting, The Asian Regional Meeting and the Latin American Regional Meeting. In view of time and resources constraints, the sub-regional meeting would be organized in the sidelines of the regional meetings. These Regional Meetings are expected to formulate a regional platform on measures aimed at improving transit transport systems. They are also expected to adopt a list of proposals for deliverables.
The International Ministerial Conference will be preceded by a preparatory committee in two sessions. The first session of the Preparatory Committee will be held from 23 to 27 June 2003 in New York. The second session of the Preparatory Committee will be held from 25 to 27 August 2003 in Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Bureau of the Conference
The General Assembly decided in paragraph 4 of its resolution 57/242 that the intergovernmental preparatory committee shall have a bureau consisting of
10 representatives of Member States elected on the basis of equitable geographical representation. The Secretary-General of the Conference will start consultations on the composition of the Bureau of the Conference.
International Ministerial Conference of Landlocked and Transit Developing Countries
and Donor Countries and Financial and Development Institutions
Of the 30 landlocked developing countries, 16 are included in the list of least developed countries. The bottom ranked country according to the 2002 UNDP Human Development Index was Sierra Leone, ranked 172. The next nine countries ranked 162-171 were landlocked countries.
Landlocked developed countries of Europe face a rather different situation. They are surrounded with the major developed markets and their seaborne trade accounts relatively small part in their external trade and their export is mainly highly value added products. Also their distance from the seaport is relatively short.
Radelet, S., Sachs, J. (1998) Shipping costs and, Manufactured Exports and Economic Growth.
Last year, the European Union decided to eliminate quotas and duties on all products except arms from the LDCs, 16 of which are landlocked countries. Norway and Poland grant duty-free treatment for almost all products of LDCs; New Zealand grants duty free treatment for all goods except apparel products; Switzerland, Poland and the Russian Federation grant duty-free treatment to all LDCs products covered by their GSP scheme; Also Australia, Canada and US grant duty free treatment for agricultural and some industrial products covered by their GSP scheme. In 2001, Japan expanded the category of products for duty free and quota free treatment by 360 items. Now, 99 percent of mining and industrial products of LDCs enjoy duty free and quota free access to the Japanese market.
UNCTAD/LDC/112, 28 June 2001