2.2.5 Competition
We have an advantage in that our Finance Director is a very able Korean business woman. It would not be far from the truth to say that the Korean monitor making companies have chosen us to represent them because they trust her and her abilities. The market itself isn’t a very competitive market, but nevertheless there always are worries that some other firm which is either much more efficient or bigger is going to come and take over the market. Till now, it’s been a mature oligopoly market.
We currently have BS5750 Quality Standard. This has been a major differentiator because many of the other organisations in the same market don’t hold such a standard. We are currently looking at ways to obtain the IS9000 (International Standard) which would further increase customers’ trust in us.
2.3 Porter’s Five Key Analysis
2.3.1 Threat of Entry
Economies of Scale
Economy of scale doesn’t really play a major role in this industry. They don’t produce
anything, nor buy things in bulk. Spare parts are supplied by their clients.
Capital Requirement
As expected, Capital Requirements are quite high
- Forklift Trucks
- Rent/Buy Warehouse (at least 65,000 sq Feet)
- Pellet Trucks
- Database Management System (suited to this industry)
- Barcode system
- Account System (SAGE)
- Equipment (For packing, unpacking, trolleys)
- Staff (Engineers, Desk-workers, Labour Workers)
Therefore one could say that the entry barrier is quite high when it comes to Starting-Capital Requirement
Differentiation
There are two main differentiators between us and other organisations in our industry.
Firstly, there are close personal links between the Finance Director and the managers in Korean companies such as Samsung Corporation
The second differentiator is that around 80% of our staffs have had more than 10 years of experience in the same industry. This is because they were working in Hulcote Electronics (Goodies previously) beforehand. Everyone working there was vastly experienced.
2.3.2 Power of Buyer + Supplier
In our industry, the buyer + supplier are not linked, but the same people.
2.3.3 Threat of Substitutes
I can see three different substitutes that could develop.
Firstly, the Korean Monitor Manufacturing companies could use other Repair Centres.
But Koreans usually always prefer to deal with Koreans because of their responsible nature. Therefore it is unlikely that he or any other managers will change to a different Repair centre unless we makes a serious mistake.
Secondly, Korean Monitor Manufacturing companies could build their own repair centres over in U.K.
This however isn’t a viable idea not only due to the cost and time involved, but because of the tough U.K legislations that stops non-UK SMEs(Small Medium Enterprises) from entering the U.K market.
Thirdly, it might soon be cheaper to scrap the monitor and delivering a new monitor rather than fixing it.
Prices of monitors have been decreasing rapidly. Even more so now that Flat Screen Monitors have started decreasing in price. Old CRT (Cathode Ray Tube) monitors are 1/10 of the price it used to be 5 years ago.
2.3.4 Competitive Rivalry
Johnson&Scholes state in their book that,
“The most competitive conditions will be those in which entry is likely, substitutes threaten and buyers or suppliers exercise control.”
Entry won’t be easy for small organisations due to the start-up capital required as it is a fair amount of money. As for big organisations, they will be reluctant to invest money as the market is already mature, and the return compared to the investment is not that great.
Substitutes as mentioned above are not very likely as they are producing a unique service rather than a product.
Regardless of everything above, the main reason why we have survived and will survive in the future is due to the fact that we specialise in dealing with Korean monitor manufacturers. Without this, I am sure that we would have had to compete very fiercely with other organisations. Korea is probably the number one monitor manufacturer in the world. This reason alone makes us operate in a much less competitive environment. In fact, it’s not an exaggeration to say that we don’t really have to compete with anyone.
2.3.5 Competition and Collaboration
To survive and be competitive in our industry, a close collaboration between our customers and suppliers is needed. We have to keep in contact regularly and try and help each other as much as they can. This builds trust.
We can help the monitor manufacturers by regularly sending them a report stating the Fault reason for all broken monitor they receive. This helps the Monitor manufacturers to spot common faults and improve their design in the future which in turn adds value to our services.
3. Internal Environment Analysis
3.1 Internal Environment Analysis Introduction
In order to really gain a ‘feel’ of the organisation, I decided to work for a month in all the existing departments. This helped me understand the culture of the organisation in a really short amount time. I then arranged the information gathered into a Cultural Web Chart.
3.2 PARADIGM CHART/ANALYSIS
Rituals and Routines
In the Goods-in/out Department, the jobs are usually taken by 17-20 year olds for its physical nature, and because of their boyish nature they tend to try and do as little as possible and also get up to a lot of practical jokes with each other
There are no set-lunch areas but the groups all have their own areas. The workers for instance will eat lunch outside at a park or nearby. The Monitor Cleaning Ladies will eat their pack lunch in the designated area. The managers will usually order take-away to their office. The engineers are usually a mixture of both.
To encourage team spirit there is an annual Barbecue for the entire staff. I heard quite a lot of workers actually enjoy and look forward to this event.
Stories
While working there, I had the unfortunate accident of losing a whole fingernail. When I complained of the pain, I had 4 different workers showing me their bruises and scars that made my injury look like an insect bite. I later came to realise that they compare bruises regularly. Nevertheless, safety is stressed over and over again, even in this humorous context.
There are also stories of how the current management is running far more efficiently than the last one.
Symbols
All the desk-workers including the managers had their desks upstairs while the workers, engineers, and monitor cleaners were all situated downstairs on the floor. This was clearly the logical layout of the organisation, but I couldn’t help but notice how cleaner and newer the upstairs toilet and the kitchen was compared to downstairs. This wasn’t the only difference between upstairs and downstairs facilities. The workers downstairs only had 40 minute for lunch at a designated time between 12:00 and 1:00pm while the upstairs staff could take up to an hour when they needed it.
Internet was also only allowed on the upstairs computers even though every computer in the organisation was hooked up onto the same network. This meant the organisation took some extra measures so that Internet wasn’t allowed downstairs.
Organisational Structure
We try to keep to a formal structure even if it’s only on paper. But because we consist only of 23 people, the structure was quite loose at the bottom. I seem to remember thinking that the organisation reminded me of a big family. The Workers were the troublesome teenage kids, the Monitor Cleaning Ladies were like Mum figure, and the engineers like dad. Even though there was a natural segregation between the groups caused by age, and nature of work, they respected and liked each other. This was helped by the fact that quite a lot of them were related with each other in some way. For instance, two of the engineers had their son working in the Goods In department. A Monitor Cleaning Lady was also married to a guy working in the Goods Out department. This is encouraged by the Operations Director to build team spirit, and whenever there is a job opening, he always asks his staff first.
Power Structure
The staffs here all seem to be happy working there for the moment except the workers in Goods In/Out department who are only there for the money. Except for the workers, I seem to remember having the impression that hat they were satisfied to their current jobs.
Control Systems
I found out within a week that the most importantly regarded machine in our organisation was the Clocking Machine.
As long as we are not behind schedule, the workers are pretty left alone. But if we get behind schedule, first thing we do is check the Clocking Machine. If they have been not clocking in enough time, then they are told off or sacked. If not, they are just told to work harder or do some overtime.
Taking days off is frowned upon but it’s nothing compared to what will happen when you take a day off without at least 3 days notice. 3 day notice is vital unless it happens to be an emergency.
Paradigm
Overall, the feeling I got from our staff was
“Fair Work, Fair Play, Fair Pay”
They were happy working there because they were content with their pay. They then do adequate amount of work to keep the place rolling and not fall behind schedule, while trying to have as much fun as they can.
4 LEADERSHIP STYLE
4.1 LEADERSHIP STYLE INTRODUCTION
Management and Leadership are two very different things. Management is rather more firmly in the context of the formal organisation, with leadership more naturally associated with the informal aspects of organisations.
Leadership theories vary from those which state that there are a set of characteristics which leaders must have to be successful to those which argue that different styles of leadership are required according to different change situations.
I personally agree with the latter style, and believe that a there is no one best way, but a range of leadership styles which should be applied differently according to the situation. This is called a ‘contingency approach’ to leadership.
4.2 Contingency Leadership Models
There are many types of contingency leadership approaches such as Tannenbaum and Schmidt (1973) which arranges leadership behaviour along a continuum, selecting the style that is most appropriate to the situation according to the ‘three forces’.
-
Forces in the manager
Skill, knowledge, personality, attributes of the manager
-
Forces in the subordinate
Subordinates vary in their characteristics due to factors such as the degree of support needed, experience in work
-
Forces in the situation
Forces caused by internal and external Environment
This model however above doesn’t illustrate how much importance should be attached to each contingency factor. A better approach would be the flexible Hersey and Blanchard’s (1993) model which tries rank each contingency factor. According to this theory, a leader’s behaviour should depend on the readiness of followers to accept and follow. The ‘path goal’ theory of leadership also agrees with this idea of being flexible leadership. They all state that the appropriate leadership style is contingent upon various situational factors.
As our current situation indicates that we are in for a ‘bumpy’ ride up ahead, I will be keeping a tight control at the top during the next few months to monitor the operations of the company. We will be much more work-focused and will try and streamline our business so that we are in a better situation to fact the future.
However, when I am satisfied that our organisation has done everything we can internally to equip ourselves for the future, we will moving towards a more responsive, and open style of leadership to encourage innovative ideas from the staff.
5 FUTURE MOVES
5.1 Key Opportunities
-
Find other suitable Korean Manufacturers
This is definitely a key agenda for us. We are also the best candidate to be approaching Korean Manufacturers due to our past records.
-
Try and approach other far-eastern countries
We could approach other big Monitor Manufacturing Countries such as Taiwan, and Japan. We could hire other far-eastern people, to help with the dealings
-
Repair other electronic items rather than just monitors
This is an obvious opportunity that could be exploited. Most manufacturing companies don’t build just one item. For example, Samsung Corporation builds monitors, computers, cameras, Stereos, Phones., the list is endless. I’ve been told by our Engineers that they can fix most things electrical. If not, they should be trained. This could open up a whole new market segment for them.
5.2 Key Threats
-
Relations between Goodies and Korean manufacturers going bad
The major factor to our success so far has been due to our prior relations with Korean Manufacturing Companies. Should anything happen to this relationship, we could be in major trouble.
-
Competition from other U.K Repair Centres
Korean managers are loyal but not stupid. If we seem to be doing terribly compared to the big U.K Repair centres (i.e. in price and service quality), they will switch.
-
Goodies Engineers can’t keep up with Monitor Technology
If the monitor industry continues developing in the rate it is now, we will have to make sure that their engineers get the adequate training or hire more competent ones. If, by any chance they fail to prepare for this, they will probably end up breaking more monitors than fixing them.
BILIOGRAPHY
BOOK/MATERIALS USED
Organisational Change
Barbara Senior
Prentice Hall (2nd Ed)
School Lecture Notes
WEB-SITES USED
www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR2-4/rhodes.html
Researching Organisational Change and Learning: A Narrative Approach by Carl
Rhodes
www.itil.tso.co.uk/organisational_change.html
www.organisationalchange.co.uk
A UK based company providing cultural change and customised organisational
change consultancy services and managing change training services. Provides a lot of information
E.g. Let’s say the buyer of our services is Samsung Corporation as they require us to handle their after-sales services.
Samsung Corporation will have to make sure that Goodies don’t run out of spare parts stock because this could damage not Goodies, but Samsung’s reputation. If Goodies don’t do a good job, Samsung will hear about it through their customers.
“Living the Digital Era” Jang Hyun Shik pg 9
Exploring Corporate Strategy Johnson&Scholes pg 120