"Examine the ways in which teachers attitudes can affect the educational achievement of pupils"
"Examine the ways in which teachers attitudes can affect the educational achievement of pupils"
Class, gender and ethnicity make a considerable difference to the educational achievement of pupils. Teachers attitudes can perpetuate these and therefore make a difference to the educational qualifications and grades pupils achieve. The idea of equality of opportunity has been conformed since 1944 when the education act was introduced. We have to understand it is inevitable that some pupils achieve more then others, this is in terms of the individual. However the point is whether there is a justifiable reason into why the educational performance of one group in our society can be superior to that of another? Weather this be due to Intelligence, social strata, education, area, social class, gender, ethnic group or teaching this can all have a perpetual effect on the educational achievement of a pupil. Sociologists such as Douglas, Boudon, Bourdieu, Becker and Bernstein have come up with evidence to prove in several ways that these facts can have an over all affect on performance.
The sort of perspective this question is coming from is a functualist perspective. Functionalists believe in the different parts played by individual societies or social institutions, in this case the school environment. Functionalists believe in identity and the way we feel about ourselves, how people's identity can have an effect on a person, for example how education provides people with the skills and qualifications needed in the world or work. Functionalists believe the society is a complex system made up with parts that all work together. They believe the society is more important then the person as the individual is produced by the society. All influences from our society make up what and who we are. The point I will try to achieve is how the social policy of teacher's attitudes impacts the education system on society, therefore how it can have a direct effect on the pupil.
Class, gender and ethnicity make a considerable difference to the educational achievement of pupils. Teachers attitudes can perpetuate these and therefore make a difference to the educational qualifications and grades pupils achieve. The idea of equality of opportunity has been conformed since 1944 when the education act was introduced. We have to understand it is inevitable that some pupils achieve more then others, this is in terms of the individual. However the point is whether there is a justifiable reason into why the educational performance of one group in our society can be superior to that of another? Weather this be due to Intelligence, social strata, education, area, social class, gender, ethnic group or teaching this can all have a perpetual effect on the educational achievement of a pupil. Sociologists such as Douglas, Boudon, Bourdieu, Becker and Bernstein have come up with evidence to prove in several ways that these facts can have an over all affect on performance.
The sort of perspective this question is coming from is a functualist perspective. Functionalists believe in the different parts played by individual societies or social institutions, in this case the school environment. Functionalists believe in identity and the way we feel about ourselves, how people's identity can have an effect on a person, for example how education provides people with the skills and qualifications needed in the world or work. Functionalists believe the society is a complex system made up with parts that all work together. They believe the society is more important then the person as the individual is produced by the society. All influences from our society make up what and who we are. The point I will try to achieve is how the social policy of teacher's attitudes impacts the education system on society, therefore how it can have a direct effect on the pupil.