Raising achievement within Mathematics

Authors Avatar by nagheb (student)

Student Number 0612851

Assignment 4:

Raising achievement within Mathematics

Education within the field of mathematics is the enhancement of knowledge and understanding, and for me, there is a strong link between the two, there seems little point in acquiring knowledge without understanding, and therefore, in order to raise achievement we must address this fundamental issue, however, whilst a deep understanding is important students must first acquire the appropriate knowledge to unlock the mysteries that lie within a problem in order to find the solution.  Fritz Schumacher, the author of ‘Small is Beautiful’, illustrates this point by using the analogy of the shoemaker. An excellent shoe maker needs to know about feet, the lives of his customers, where the feet go and what loads they will be expected to carry. The knowledge of how to make excellent shoes is only truly useful when linked with an understanding of the lives of those who wear the shoes. This illustration of the link between knowledge and understanding has always struck me as profound, a link which can easily be broken and difficult to restore. This, therefore, begs the question of how can I as a teacher of mathematics increase knowledge and understanding and in so doing raise standards of achievement.

Given that the national average for GCSE results for 2006 was 57% 1.  I consider myself to have been extremely privileged to have been placed in two schools that were both high achieving, popular, over subscribed and well disciplined schools, both had GCSE A* to C pass rates for mathematics of over 90%,with one school receiving a commendation from OFSTED. As a result my Initial Teacher Training has focused on continuing to maintain those high standards, and has encouraged me to actively seek out new and alternative ways of ensuring that all pupils, including those that have not necessarily been identified as failing but are not learning at their optimal level, are encouraged to meet their full potential. Whilst my two placement schools were very similar in terms of their academic success, the schools individual demographics were, at first glance, dissimilar. At my first school placement the pupils were predominately Asian, many of whom were from a working class backgrounds, whilst at my second school placement the pupils are all Christian or Jewish and predominately white, that said, there is a significant ethnic minority of mainly Afro-Caribbean pupils and according to the IDACI2. tables there is an even spread between working and middle class backgrounds. On the face of it my two school experiences could be said to be very different, however, upon reflection the schools are more similar than they are dissimilar, for both have the same hard working ethos and belief that they are excellent schools with exceptionally high expectations from staff, pupils and parents. Both promote a strong sense of ownership within the school, a greater sense of belonging with the emphasis on pupils taking individual and personal responsibility for their own learning, general safety and well being. Both implemented policies which, supported by the results of current educational research, ensured that every pupil would be encouraged to fulfill their full potential, and thus both my schools work in harmony with latest educational theories, ( the headmaster of one is currently actively involved in consultations with the UK government with regard to raising achievement). Strict policies with regard to discipline were rigorously enforced whilst maintaining a caring and nurturing environment where everyone from pupils to cleaning staff, right through to head teacher and including members of the public mattered, thus taking the idea of ‘ every child matters’ to a new, higher plateau. Class sizes varied with some of my classes being as large as 34 children in one class, however, as long as pupils are well behaved then class size becomes less pertinent. I was encouraged at all times to ensure I used lots of discipline techniques, such as insisting on silence before I spoke, hands up when pupils wanted to ask a question, pens down and looking at me and no going to the toilet in the middle of my mathematics lesson! Gradually I became much more confident and familiar with these techniques which are now slowly becoming second nature where I no longer need to consciously make the effort to implement them. I found that shouting at a class, particularly an older, teenage class such as a year 10 only served to antagonize and aggravate them; whilst there remains the occasional need to raise my voice in order to gain their attention I ensure that my voice remains calm and steady at all times, with no hint of impatience or anger. I found that in so doing I gained much more respect and they were more willing to concede and become manageable, thus creating a more preferable, pleasanter and stronger learning environment. Nevertheless, regardless of class size there was always the premise that every student is an individual and therefore needs individual attention. As a result both schools, in particular my second school placement, had an open staff room door policy, so long as a pupil is not disturbing a scheduled class they are free to ask for help at any time, hence lunch is often very rushed.

Join now!

I often take my lunch in the dinning hall along with several other members of staff and the pupils, I found this makes me appear more accessible and approachable not only to the children but to other members of staff, in particular classroom assistants and staff from other departments. I am always fascinated to hear their stories, trials and tribulations they face with some of their pupils; it is so interesting how some pupils can behave very differently depending on the teacher and the subject lesson! This interaction and exchange of ideas often stimulates me to improve upon my ...

This is a preview of the whole essay