This essay will examine the individual learning needs of a child with an autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) called Mikail. The essay will explore the continuum of provision within the education system and also the continuum of needs with regards to Mikail

Authors Avatar

This essay will examine the individual learning needs of a child with an autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) called Mikail. The essay will explore the continuum of provision within the education system and also the continuum of needs with regards to Mikail’s needs. This essay will also look at the current policies and legislative frameworks in place along with implications for practice and the current provisions available to meet the autistic needs of Mikail.

The case study discussed within this essay looks at a four year old child called Mikail. He has diagnosed with an autistic spectrum disorder. He has regressing language with social interaction issues in which he becomes anxious when approached by either adults or his peers.

Individual learning needs looks at the ‘legal and planning framework for special educational needs and provision is drawn together from primary legislation and guidance’ (Teachernet, 2009) The framework includes a range of laws legislations and acts including the SEN code of Practice and toolkit 2002, SEN Disability Act (SENDA) 2001 and Code of Practice.

According to Teachernet (2009) ‘The Learning Trust believes that special schools should be perceived as specialist schools for inclusion with a broadened and flexible remit...’ This will help to ensure all the individual needs of the children and young people with server learning needs are meet whilst including a continuum of provision. Primary schools now run schemes called School Action and School Action Plus, which allows extra support for children with special needs.

The continuum of need refers to four different levels ranging from mild, moderate, severe and profound. The DfCSF (2009) confirms the four different levels with a ‘windscreen wiper’ model, which looks at all children, to children with complex learning difficulties. They refer to it as a windscreen wiper model because each individual child’s needs are continuously changing through education and growth. The Learning Trust (2007) considers all children and young people to be on a continuum of needs. Where there is a continuum of need, a continuum of provision should be made available. A continuum of provision looks at the difference in provision for different learning needs and include mainstream, mainstream with specialist adjustments, co-located provision and advisory, support and outreach services.  The continuum of needs was officially recognised within the Warnock Report (1978) which resulted in provision being implemented in the form of The Code of Practice and the Identification and Assessment of Special Educational Need (DfE, 1994).

In 1978 the Warnock Committee carried out an important review of the education of children with special needs (Warnock, 1978). This was called the Warnock Report (1978) which was chaired by Mary Warnock and was the first enquiry to review educational provision for children with disabilities since 1889. Tassoni (2006:438) regards this report as ‘one of the most influential pieces of legislation to affect disabled children in the twentieth century.’ The report identified recommendations which have significantly influenced not only past legislation but also up to date legislation. The Education Act (1981) introduced the notion of identifying a child’s educational needs through assessment and statement procedure. The law prompted the need for inclusion by formally introducing ‘integration’ to the education system. (Vaughan, 2009) This gave children with disabilities the opportunity to choose whether they wanted to attend mainstream schools. The 1981 Act also impelled substantial changes by providing parents with the right to have their wishes taken into account concerning educational provision for their child. The 1981 Act was outdated by the introduction of the 1993 Act which facilitated amendments for the education of children with special needs in England.

The Disability Discrimination Act (DDA), (1995) ensured that children have reasonable adjustments made for them and that no child with a disability is treated unfairly. The purpose of the Act (1995) was to support the policies and requirements of the Education Act (1996) to provide all children with special educational needs an education and school place appropriate to their requirements. The Disability Discrimination Act (1995) set out two key duties, these were to guarantee that no child with a disability is treated less favorably and to make practical adjustments for children with disabilities.

Excellence for All Children- Meeting Special Educational Needs (1997) is a government publication that promoted inclusion for children with SEN within mainstream settings wherever possible. It also emphasized their paramount importance of supporting parents of children with SEN, encouraging parents to have confidence to have their say in the provision of education for their child and to empower them to contribute themselves to their child’s development. They set out a clear approach and dedication for improving standards for children with SEN.

Join now!

According to a report carried out by Ofsted, ‘Inclusion: Does it Matter Where Pupils Are Taught’, there was little differentiation in the quality of provision in primary mainstream and special schools. However, mainstream schools with additionally resourced provision were particularly successful in achieving high outcomes for pupils academically, socially and personally (Ofsted, 2006). High quality, skilled practitioners and a commitment by school leaders are the key to success according to Ofsted (2006). The report (2006) was concerned with the inclusion debate, stating that it has for too long focused on whether children with SEN should be educated in mainstream or ...

This is a preview of the whole essay