Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10

The aim of this laboratory experiment is to examine the tensile strength of three specimen of low, medium and high carbon steels is examined. The microstructure of the specimen is determined and calculations such as tensile strength, yield strength etc we

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

INDEX Page ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 1 BACKGROUND 2-3 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE 4 RESULTS 5-6 DISCUSION 7-8 CONCLUSION 8 ABSTRACT The aim of this laboratory experiment is to examine the tensile strength of three specimen of low, medium and high carbon steels is examined. The microstructure of the specimen is determined and calculations such as tensile strength, yield strength etc were clearly recorded. Also, the background theory was stated, the apparatus and procedure used to achieve the experiment was described. The main part of this lab report is the discussion on the results and how close they've been calculated to the original theoretical values by taking into consideration some external experimental errors. The last part of this report is the conclusion on the whole procedure. INTRODUCTION The main purpose of this lab report is by using a tensile testing machine (Hounsfield tensometer), to determine mechanical properties of three different plain carbon steel materials (low carbon steel, medium carbon steel and high carbon steel). Also, their grain structure is to be examined using a Metallurgical microscope. BACKGROUND The three different materials are the low-carbon, medium-carbon and high carbon steels. Their tensile strength is examined which by definition is explained as the amount of stress that a material can resist when a force pulls it along its length until a complete deformation takes place. ...read more.

Middle

This force is measured (in kN) on a digital force meter which is connected to the machine. On the top there is a cylinder with a graph paper around it in order to sketch a graph of force against the extension of the specimen. This is done by moving the pointer on the graph paper by 0,5kN respectively and pointing on the graph each time the reading on the digital force meter increases by 0,5kN, for instance, if the reading reaches 1,0kN the pointer has to be pointing at 1,0kN and by the time that the reading is 1,0kN a point is sketched on the graph. (See figure 2 below) Figure 2. Furthermore, measurements of the length and cross-sectional area were taken before and after the test in order to determine the percentages of elongation and the reduction in area. The last part of the experiment is to examine the three micro-specimens given which is the exact same material and condition as the three materials used on the tensile machine and determine the percentage of the carbon content of their grain structure. This is done by using a Metallurgical Microscope. RESULTS The results of the experiment were calculated and recorded on a table as shown below: Test piece material % carbon content Yield strength (N/mm2) Ultimate tensile strength (N/mm2) % elongation % reduction in area Specimen A Low-carbon steel 0,1 315 430 37 66 Specimen D Medium-carbon steel 0,4 475 660 28 62 Specimen N High-carbon steel 0,8 932 960 13 30 All the specimens had normalized treatment conditions. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, from the tables plotted on the tensometer machine the load that every specimen could withstand, the elongation percentage and the reduction in cross-sectional area were different. By considering these values, low-carbon steels have the least amount of load before complete deformation and the most percentage on both reduction in cross-sectional and elongation of the three specimens. This means that low-carbon steels have the least amount of carbon. In addition, low carbon steels can be defined as ductile materials. Medium-carbon and high-carbon steels are less ductile have les percentage of elongation. This means that they are harder and they are applied more load in order for deformation to take place. Finally, the last part of the discussion is about the different yield point of the three specimens. If the graphs are considered, a sudden fall of the load appears to take place on the graphs of low and medium carbon steels during the procedure. This means that the two specimens faced a reduction in cross-sectional area (also known as necking). This doesn't seem to happen to the specimen of high-carbon steel which means that the deformation took place without having any noticeable reduction in cross-sectional area as the load was kept increasing. CONCLUSION In conclusion, the three specimens where tested and results were given. Since the calculated values meet the theoretical values, the experiment was successful. Discussion about the ductility and the main structure of the given specimens was made and also the differences between them were stated. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Engineering section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Engineering essays

  1. Airflow and Venturi Experiment Report

    Substituting equation 6 into equation 9 gives: V3 = 2 ?paraffin g ?H ?air (eqn. 10) This can be used to calculate the velocity at each radius the pitot is traversed across the tube. This will be a maximum at the tube's centreline, falling to zero at the boundary of the pipe (the pipe's wall).

  2. Bernoulli's Theorem Distribution Experiment

    Duct area, A (m2) Velocity (m/s) Static head h, (m) Dynamic head, (m) Total head ho (m) 1 h1 0.00 490.9 x10-6 0.3056 185 x 10-3 0.0048 0.1898 2 h2 0.0603 151.7 x10-6 0.9888 135 x 10-3 0.0498 0.1848 3 h3 0.0687 109.4 x10-6 1.3711 55 x 10-3 0.0958 0.1508

  1. Creep in Metals Laboratory Report

    During the tertiary stage, readings were recorded every 15 seconds until fracture occurred. This process was repeated 2 more times with a new lead specimen each time and weights of 0.7kg and 0.8kg, respectively. Parameters Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Length 38.16 mm 38.10 mm 38.04 mm Width 4.80

  2. Trifilar Suspension Lab experiment

    Graph 2 shows the relationship between the results, both recorded and calculated, and the ratio . From the graph the linear relationship, with positive slope, can clearly be seen Errors As you can see the results obtained from the experiment are relatively close to the values of T calculated using the theory.

  1. Universal Tensile Test on Mild Steel and Brass Specimens

    However, brass is an alloy of copper and zinc, and the hardness of brass are depends upon the amount of zinc present in it. Therefore, mild steel will be stronger and more ductile if compared to brass. Discussion : The graph above shows the tensile test for Brass Specimen and Mild steel.

  2. Measurement of the Specific Heat Capacity of a Metal Specimen

    Measure the temperature of the boiling water 3. Weigh the empty calorimeter (including its lid and stirrer) 4. Remove the calorimeter from the balance and add room temperature water until it is about half full. 5. Calculate the mass of the water added. 6. Measure the temperature of the water in the calorimeter 7.

  1. Stainless steels

    In the late 1890s, Hans Goldschmidt of Germany developed an aluminothermic (thermite) process for producing carbon-free chromium. In the years 1904-1911 several researchers, particularly Leon Guillet of France, prepared alloys that would today be considered stainless steel. Friedrich Krupp Germaniawerft built the 366-ton sailing yacht Germania featuring a chrome-nickel steel hull in Germany in 1908.

  2. Extrusion. The aim of this experiment was to examine the effects of different cross ...

    Less heat is present as there is less friction leads to lower probability of cracks The billet is used more uniformly so extrusion defects and coarse grained peripherals zones are less likely. Disadvantages Impurities and defects on the surface of the billet affect the surface of the extrusion.

  • Over 180,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.