• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14

The pressure-temperature relation for liquid-vapour phase equilibrium of water substance

Extracts from this document...


DEN107 Thermodynamics - Laboratory The pressure-temperature relation for liquid-vapour phase equilibrium of water substance Paul James Ashley 05 003984 3 April 23rd 2006 Abstract The objective of the experiment is to verify that the relationship between pressure and temperature is described by the Clausius-Clapeyron equation, derived in two forms in the theory. Two experiments were carried out on two sets of equipment, one for pressures below atmospheric and one for those above atmospheric. The results are presented, and graphs show that there is an almost exact linear trend for pressures above atmospheric, and an approximately linear relationship for pressures below atmospheric. Calculations with comparison to published tables show that the results from this experiment do indeed follow the trend described by the Clausius-Clapeyron, and as such the objectives were met. Where any differences exist, these are accounted for by experimental and human error, of which experimental error was estimated from the graphs at 4.6%. Contents Introduction page 3 Background Theory page 4 Apparatus page 6 Experimental Procedure page 7 Results page 8 Discussion page 10 Conclusions page 13 References page 14 Introduction The experiment performed in the laboratory was to investigate the relationship between pressure and temperature for two phases of water in equilibrium. Before the experiment was performed it was assumed that the two variables are related, and this assumption is supported by the derivation of the Clausius-Clapeyron Equation in the background theory. ...read more.


4 (Pressures recorded in mmHg were converted to kPa by multiplying by 0.1333, and temperatures recorded on the Celsius scale were converted to Kelvin by adding 273.2 K) Atmospheric Conditions Ambient Temperature 21.5 oC 294.7 K Atmospheric Pressure 751.55 mmHg 100.18 kPa Fig. 5 These results are displayed on the figures below. Fig. 6 Fig. 7 Discussion While the observations were being recorded it quickly became obvious that there was an approximately linear relationship between temperature and pressure. This can be seen most clearly on the graph (figure 6) for the high pressure experiment. For the low pressure experiment the relationship appears to be approximately linear, but as the pressure approaches atmospheric, the relationship becomes more polynomial and the temperature appears to be more closely dependant on the absolute pressure. These observations are supported by the results pictured in the logarithmic graph (figure 7). As might be expected from Eq. 10, both of the lines have a negative gradient. It can still be seen however that, especially for the low pressure experiment, the relationship between the two variables is approximately but not exactly linear. The results from this experiment appear to show that the linear relationship is lost as the temperature increases. There are a number of factors that could start to explain this phenomenon. Firstly, experimental error needs to be taken in to account. It is important to recognise the limitations of the laboratory equipment that was used in the experiment. ...read more.


In the introduction, the aims of the experiment were to firstly that there is a relationship between pressure and temperature for this particular substance, and secondly that the relationship is accurately described by the Clausius-Clapeyron Equation. Since the graphs show clear trends, in one case almost exactly linear, there is clearly some relationship between pressure and temperature. Further, that the value of hfg estimated from the results of this experiment is in close proximity to the value published in tables (which are known to follow the Clausius-Clapeyron trend) [6] the relationship in this experiment must also be described by the Clausius-Clapeyron equation. Conclusions * There is a definite relationship between pressure and temperature. For the low pressure experiment, this is a curved relationship which is approximately linear. For the high pressure experiment this relationship is almost exactly linear. * Results would have been affected by experimental error, including errors in the equipment itself. The most important factor appears to be the escape of the substance from the equipment during measuring * Human error would also be a factor in the results, where difficulty in making readings or parallax errors could affect their accuracy * In the derivation of the equations used in the experiment, assumptions were made which were later shown to be valid * The error in the experiment is estimated at 4.6% * Since the value of hfg estimated from the results is in close proximity to that published in tables, pressure and temperature indeed follow a trend described by the Clausius-Clapeyron equation * As such the objectives were met. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Engineering section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Engineering essays

  1. Project Management Theory and practice

    26 Coordination with Authorities ? ? ? 27 Inspections for handing over ? ? ? 28 Project Completion ? ? ? 29 Test & Commissioning ? ? ? 30 Project Acceptance ? ? ? 31 Retail Tenancy ? ?

  2. The object of this experiment is to determine the Liquid and Plastic Limits of ...

    A major error of heating the sample could have occurred while conducting this experiment. Due to the time restrictions that we where under we decided to heat the samples by microwave. When referring to BS 1377 Classification test it says that microwaves should not be used to dry samples.

  1. Electrical circuits. This assignment involved carrying out 5 different experiments relating to electrical circuits. ...

    This is known as a process called drifting which is when an electric field is used to accelerate electrons which results in the electrons gaining some kinetic energy. After this a collision with another atom is inevitable and the electrons lose some of the acquired energy which results in a drift in the positive direction (Lesurf 2002).

  2. Liquid Liquid Extraction Experiment

    Liquid-liquid extractions may also be used as energy saving processes by, for example, eliminating distillation stages. It is possible, of course that the substance of interest may be heat-sensitive anyway and that distillation is accordingly an unacceptable process. There are a few characteristics that are required in choosing the solvent for LLE process.

  1. Osbourne Reynolds Apparatus Experiment

    Turbulent flow is much different with laminar, as it is a highly disordered fluid motion characterized by velocity and fluctuations and eddies, whereas transition flow is known as a flow that contains both laminar and turbulent regions. Based on Reynolds apparatus experiment, laminar flow is obtained when a single ordered

  2. Control System- Pressure Regulator

    At a given time interval, the external system regulates valve No. 2 to comply with the needed specifications. The curves given in Fig 1.0 FIG 1.1 Shows the way in which it alters the process of the pressure. In earlier results in time, t1, some initial stable condition exists where,

  1. Bernoulli's Theorem Distribution Experiment

    (h1 - h5) 100 and 150 mm water. 6. Next, the experiment is repeated for divergent test section tube. RESULTS Convergent Flow Pressure difference = 50 mm water Volume (m3) = 0.003 Time (s) = 46 Flow rate (m3/s) = 6.522x10-5 No Pressure head, h Distance into duct (m) Duct area, A (m2)

  2. Structural Mechanics

    Floor Plan, showing beam calculated reactions (so far). From our calculated reactions we can work out beams 5(A) and 5(B) (which are identical due to the fact the same reactions are being applied) and beam 6(A). In doing this we can calculate 4(A). Beams 5(A) and 5(B): - Calculating beam 5(A)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work