• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“The French Revolution was simply a product of Enlightenment thought.” How accurate is this statement as a general comment on origin of the political ideas of the French Revolution?

Extracts from this document...


"The French Revolution was simply a product of Enlightenment thought." How accurate is this statement as a general comment on origin of the political ideas of the French Revolution? The nature of the French Revolution has always been a source of contention to historians of the period. Interpretations of the Revolution, it can be argued, are usually more of an illustration of the author's own particular consequences and political leanings than a completely accurate account of its actual causes. The French Revolution and history's interpretation of its causes and significance has been rewritten constantly by almost every generation of historians since the event. In any discussion of the quotation at the top of this essay as a valid description of the ideas of the French Revolution, requires that we study these differing interpretations, which should then allow us to piece together a more objective portrayal of its causes. Initially historians believed that the French Revolution was simply the product of grand conspiracy. The main proponent of this explanation was Abbe Barruel, who believed the cause could be found in the fusion of three different factors. Barruel's thesis stated that an anti-Christian conspiracy, by a Godless intelligentsia found favour among the masses through the network of freemasons lodges, which then ...read more.


"If we look for rational, physical causes of misfortune instead of attributing them to witchcraft, if accept the impersonal wage system in place of personal slavery, if we reject the torture of individuals as a means of eliciting the truth and use instead use the impersonal rules of law, if we do not regard personal salvation as so important that we are not prepared to burn people in order to achieve it for them as well as ourselves, if we do not believe that the stars are concerned with our individual fortunes, and so on, we are tacitly acknowledging the influence of the Enlightenment over our assumptions and actions..."6 Under this reasoning it is clear that the French Revolution and modern society is indebted to the effects of the Enlightenment. After the proclamation of the sovereignty of the National Assembly in 1789, the assertion of the supremacy of law over all other interests was accomplished.7 In this respect the ideas of the Enlightenment clearly shone through. Cobban of course is part of the next generation writing in the 20th Century but despite Cobban's explanation of the Enlightenment and his provision of plausible ties to the French Revolution, he refuses to expressly acknowledge the influence of one of the most closely linked writers of the Enlightenment, Jean Jacques Rousseau. ...read more.


In the interest of this objectivity though, the fact that Cobben's explanation appears most convincing is perhaps not a coincidence considering he is a more recent historian. There were people who firmly believed in the explanations of Barruel and Michelet and now it seems perhaps a little to convenient that the likes of Cobban seem more persuasive. As it was stated at the beginning of this essay, history is written under the influence of current events and bias, so who is to say that to deem the French Revolution the beginning of the age of nationalism is not simply a vain attempt to justify events of our own time. After all is one of the main motivations for the study history not the search for explanations to present situations? Whatever the case maybe it is clear that to give the credit for the ideas of the French Revolution to the Enlightenment only would be incorrect. Whether Cobban's suggestion of the part absolute monarchy is enough or not remains to be seen. Clearly though even the Enlightenment did not happen by itself. The years preceding it and the trends of that age inspired the thoughts and reflections of those thinkers, this in itself means that it would be naive to rely to heavily on the Enlightenment as the single explanation for the ideas behind the French Revolution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1700-1799 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1700-1799 essays

  1. Was the French revolution a Bourgeoisie revolution?

    This is where they went drastically wrong, because it gave the Bourgeoisie just the chance they needed to seize power for themselves. The Bourgeoisie rebelled when, under the terms of the 1614 Estates-General it said that they would have to sit separately.

  2. Is the Cultural Revolution best characterised as a top-level power struggle or a mass ...

    Tensions between opposing classes within the realms of education had been mounting for a some time prior to the Revolution. Indeed, Mao's call for an attack on the capitalist roaders was the perfect excuse for the students to turn this tension into full-blown violence.

  1. Were The Causes Of The French Revolution Mainly Short Term?

    1780's are all important when considering this pivotal event in 18th century European history. The Marxist interpretation is that the aristocratic revolt weakened the political authority of the monarchy, enabling the bourgeoisie to overthrow the aristocracy and establish a capitalist bourgeois order for feudalism.

  2. American revolution

    With the Magna Carta limiting the power of nobles and preventing the king from ever becoming a tyrant, American colonists believed that the English system would prevent the "evil tendencies of human nature"5 from abusing power and liberty. Until the 1750's people agreed with this system until the mother country began imposing new taxes.

  1. Was the industrial Revolution a good thing?

    Many children that were born died before they grew up. 1 in 6 children died before they reached 1 year of age and 1 in 3 before they reached 5. Disease attacked the weakest people. That of course included the babies and young children.

  2. It is true that Comrade Mao Tse-tung made gross mistakes during the 'Cultural Revolution', ...

    On reading the humiliated history of China, Mao once said, "I felt depressed about the future of my country and began to realize that it was the duty of all the people to help save it" (Karnow 1972:P32). When Japanese invaded China in the 1930s and 1940s , Mao and

  1. Through examining the historians Georges Lefebvre and Alfred Cobban, what are the underlying factors ...

    The historians Georges Lefebvre (1874-1959) and Alfred Cobban (1901-1968) are two of the leading authorities of the French Revolution and are exemplary of this notion. Lefebvre represents the Marxist School of history which established the Orthodox, or popularly accepted interpretation of the revolution.

  2. Why did the Industrial Revolution Occur in Britain First?

    Its transportation network had moved to a level beyond those of their European rivals. Great Britain was blessed with an abundant source of minerals that included coal, copper, lead, tin and iron.3 With the improvements made in the transportation systems, these natural resources became more accessible, and as such, Great Britain was able to utilize them more thoroughly.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work