• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

After the accession of Henry VIII, England began an inevitable change towards Protestantism, which was supported and encouraged by the English People'. How far do you agree with the appraisal of religious change that took place in England 1500-1600?

Extracts from this document...


'After the accession of Henry VIII, England began an inevitable change towards Protestantism, which was supported and encouraged by the English People'. How far do you agree with the appraisal of religious change that took place in England 1500-1600? The rise of Protestantism was not inevitable. There was certainly a strong force for a separation from Rome. As we shall see Henry VIII had a strong personal motivation for the separation. Significant sections of the elite resented the influence of Rome. The seizure of Church assets had a financial benefit for some of the elite and gentry. English nationalism was a feature for the general public. One of the few areas of agreement between writers is that there was general support for the ascendancy of the English monarch over the Roman Pope. However, there was a debate amongst the elite about whether there should be an English form of Catholicism or a comprehensive move towards Protestantism. It is possible to argue that the outcome could have been a Church of England, which was more recognisably Catholic. Given the concentration of power that existed in the hands of the monarch and his or her immediate advisors, their motivation is key to understanding whether the change was inevitable. ...read more.


Most of the population regarded interference by foreigners to be an affront to English nationalism. Mary resisted advice to take a more pragmatic and cautious approach, even from the Pope himself. If Mary had re-introduced the return of Catholic religious practices, without the ending of royal supremacy and overt persecution she would have been more likely to create consensus. She was succeeded by her Protestant half-sister Elizabeth. She pursued a religious middle way, as the best means of stabilising her authority and securing peace. As we shall see Elizabeth was most successful because her approach was more broadly aligned to the will of the people than her two predecessors. Elizabeth was disinclined to pry into her subject's innermost thoughts, and as long as they offered outward conformity and political loyalty, she was prepared to turn a blind eye to many things. However, for those who offended her the punishment was hard. Elizabeth restored England to the Protestant camp, but to the moderate wing. Elizabeth understood that her country was being torn apart by the warring doctrines. While she repealed Mary's Catholic legislation, she did not return to Edward's more austere Protestantism. Rather, she worked out a compromise church that retained as much as possible from the Catholic church while putting into place most of the foundational ideas of Protestantism. The expression 'English People' requires further examination. ...read more.


The evidence for this is that the majority of people adjusted themselves to Mary's restoration of the Catholic Church and Elizabeth's subsequent return to moderate Protestantism. CONCLUSION From the point that Henry broke with the Church of Rome it was highly likely that a Church of England would develop. It was not inevitable that the Church of England would be Protestant. At the end of Henry's reign the English church was still Catholic in form. Edward attempted to move the Church towards Calvinism, but his reign was too short for him to achieve a fundamental change. Had Mary's reign been longer and /or her approach been more pragmatic she may have achieved her Restoration of Catholicism. Elizabeth's compromise was the most successful because she recognised that the Protestant Reformation had not comprehensively won over the hearts and minds of the people. The notion of the English people is problematic. The contention that Protestantism was "supported and encouraged" by the people is even more difficult. If it was the people pushing for the Reformation it is likely that Elizabeth's reforms would have been more radical and less of a compromise. Therefore, it was more the actions of the monarchs, rather than will of the people that pulled the country into the Reformation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1500-1599 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1500-1599 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "From her arrival in 1568, Mary Stuart posed a major threat to the security ...

    3 star(s)

    For example Elizabeth introduced the use of the Protestant prayer Book. Therefore Elizabeth created support for Mary Stuart with her own actions. This increases Mary's threat and shows that the security of Elizabeth's throne was intensified by some actions taken by Elizabeth.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Was there a decisive change in ideas about masculinity and femininity

    "Women's wetter, colder bodies made them more melancholy, and men's hotter, drier ones made them more prone to anger."3 Men were perceived as strong, stoic and rational, able to control their emotions, whilst women were seen as emotional, irrational and weak.

  1. To what extent can Wolsey be considered the master rather than the servant in ...

    Again it is arguable that Wolsey saw this ostentation as part of the job to reflect the image of Henry and England in a positive light abroad. One of the earliest examples of Wolsey's ability to organise and administrate is the campaign that resulted in the English capture of Tournai in 1513.

  2. History 1500

    so that they may not to be harmed by "the men from the skies"3. The reaction from the Spanish towards the natives was pretty much the same, one of friendship, but with ulterior motives. The Spanish saw the natives as malleable entities, something that they owned, that if they treated

  1. In what ways has Roman Catholicism been an example of both religious tradition and ...

    Since the 6th century the Church of England has been Roman Catholic, therefore it was held in high regard and the English people's aversion to change led to an unfavourable look at the dissent caused by the beginning of the Protestant movement.

  2. Was female rule unacceptable in early modern Europe? ...

    Female rule in early modern Europe was unacceptable. Men did see women as more feeble, both physically and mentally, and assumed that they were automatically superior. Women were nothing more than the child bearers, a point exemplified by marriages that were able to be absolved if no children were born (regardless of religion).

  1. Assess the view that the Dutch rebels challenged Philip IIs rule primarily in defense ...

    The manner in which Philip and his representatives, as foreigners, ruled the people was oppressive, as was his way of tackling their religious expression. Tax increases, whilst adversely affecting the economy, served to unite the rebels in defence of their liberty to trade unhindered.

  2. Anne Boleyn - historians such as G. W. Bernard, E. W. Ives and Retha ...

    marry Jane, there would have been no advantage to such a procedure. Bernard also rejects Eric Ives perspective that Anne was destroyed by a court conspiracy engineered by Thomas Cromwell. In Bernard's opinion this renders Henry as "weak" which contradicts his view of Henry as a strong and dominant leader.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work