• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast rationalist and empiricist approaches to human nature.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast rationalist and empiricist approaches to human nature. In order to compare and contrast the different approaches to human behaviour that the rationalist and empiricist have, it will be necessary to look at several psychologist and their theories. It is most important to first look at the main differences in the approaches that rationalist and empiricist take and secondly to look at the theories of Rene Descartes (1596-1650): Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679): John Locke's (1632-1704) and lastly an overview of the thoughts of: Gottfried Leibniz (1646-1716), Christian Wolff (1679-1754), David Hume (1711-1776) and Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). Rationalism is Latin for 'reason' and in science it means 'do not trust your senses as they can be misleading'. Rationalists do not trust senses and put their faith in mathematical proof. In psychology rationalist believe in the 'mind' and innate qualities. Rationalism tends to thrive in France and Italy. Empiricism is Greek for 'experience' and in science means 'trust your senses'. Empiricists use observation, facts and experience to guide them on what can be known. ...read more.

Middle

According to Descartes the metaphysical mind lives in the physical brain, which leaves the question of how can something metaphysical control something? Therefore we are left with the 'ghost in the machine' problem. British empiricist, Thomas Hobbes claimed that Descartes theory was not scientific. Hobbes attempted to solve Descartes 'ghost in the machine problem', although Hobbes agreed with everything that Descartes stated about the body he rejected claims that did not make sense, specifically the mind, in doing this he was rejecting Cartesian dualism (Hobbes was a monist). Hobbes claim that the mind did not exist, this meant that humans were no different to animals and that humans did not have the ability to reason. Hobbes believed that all living things are motivated to pursue pleasure and to avoid unpleasure, this being known as hedonism. John Locke tried to establish a compromise between Descartes and Hobbes. Although a British empiricist, Locke agreed with the ideas put forward by Descartes. Locke agreed with dualism and the minds ability to reason, however he rejected Descartes claim that humans have innate knowledge (beauty, truth and justice); Locke claimed that at birth the mind was a tabula rasa (blank slate) ...read more.

Conclusion

David Hume tried to establish how learning is learnt, he believed that this was achieved through 'associationism'. Hume claimed that associationism happened in three ways, similarity, cause and effects, and contiguity. Hume claimed that human action was a result of experience and experience acts as a cue as to what to do next. After reading the work of Hume, Immanual Kant, an orthodox German rationalist, tried to prove him wrong......WHY? ON WHAT?... Kant put forward the idea that supposing there was two worlds, the 'noumena' - the world as God sees it, and the 'phenomena' - the way that humans experience the world. Kant claimed that 'humans only see the world through human eye and not as it really is therefore our minds mould our experiences'. Kant also contradicts Hobbes claim that we are no different from animals by stating that each animal species sees the world their way To conclude, Rene Descartes theory of human nature laid the foundation for other theorist to build upon. However it is the work of John Locke that takes the more realistic approach and that is to compromise both the rationalists and empiricists' ideas as they both have some very important ideas. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This essay includes a lot of points about the key thinkers. Unfortunately these points lack explanation and clarity and are often a little dubious. The claims of the essay are at their weakest when the writer makes broad generalisations without support. The biggest problem with this essay is that the numerous points it makes are made in complete isolation from each other. We are offered simply a list of the views of each theorist, with virtually no explanation of what these claims mean or why they are significant. One example: we are told whether most of the thinkers think that humans are "the same" as animals or "different", but without explanation of what this means or why it is relevant. Without this kind of further comment, the information is definitely irrelevant to the essay. More generally there is no sense of a theme or point developing in the essay. What would be far better would be a series of simple points, clearly explained, about the stances of the thinkers and then some comment about the general differences and strengths and weaknesses of the rationalists and empiricists. An essay which asks to compare and contrast requires more than simply listing what the various thinkers have thought over the years. The bibliography reveals that only three sources have been consulted: two academic and both psychology texts. Whatever the discipline, it is a good idea, if one is writing about the rationalists and empiricists, to consult a philosophical source. There are a number of first-rate encyclopedias of philosophy available online or introductory philosophy books that would might have provided a much better understanding of the basic ideas involved in this topic.

Marked by teacher David Moss 01/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. God Of Small Things - Significance of the title.

    He should have called her a bourgeois (if he followed the English practice of applying the term to both men and women) or, even more correctly, a bourgeoise (middle-class woman). This emphasizes the fact that Ammu is considered of lower classes.

  2. In this paper, I am going to compare and contrast Hume's empiricism to Descartes' ...

    Hume agrees that we are accustomed to seeing certain events in constant conjunction. When an object is presented to us, it is impossible for us, by any means, discover, without experience what will result of it. According to Hume, ideas are copied from some preceding impressions.

  1. The Problem of the Grudge Informer describes a situation that two major philosophical theories ...

    However, I conclude that if one recommendation were chosen then the third deputy presents the most satisfying plan for all parts of the justice system. Each of the other recommendations contains slight defects of which I will examine. According to the first deputy's recommendation, we shouldn't and can't prosecute any of the 'grudge informers.'

  2. Compare Aristotle and Locke on private property. How are their views similar? different?

    Aristotle states that in order to "live the good life" one must have a certain amount of wealth and possessions. Therefore Aristotle finds a certain, yet ambiguous mean that citizens should abide by in order to be virtuous. Aristotle claims that land ownership should indeed be private but available for "common-use."

  1. Explain Plato's dualistic theory.

    In view of this, it is important to declare that although Aristotle rejected this approach to morality and logical thinking, further support is provided by Heraclitus, who also considered that because no object in the world is unchanging (reliable), it is impossible to hold anything as a certain, unchanging truth.

  2. Compare and contrast Christian and Hindu beliefs about: Life; Death; The Beyond.

    These Christians also deride the idea that the soul goes on to the after life they believe life after death only happens if God chooses to recreate the person in a spiritual body, death is the end of the person.

  1. What is the relationship between mind and body?

    It is this essential nature of the mind, or soul, as it is commonly referred to, established the discussion of 'essence'. Descartes claimed that a man cannot be separated from his soul, as it is his essence, it is that which makes him exactly the object which he is.

  2. Essay on MLK's Letter from Birmingham Jail for Philosophy Class

    He also references the Boston Tea Party as one huge, nationalistic act of civil disobedience. One of King's most important arguments in this letter is his distinction between just and unjust laws, and the subsequent adherence each one requires. King references St.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work