• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Comparing economic change in Britain and China from 1760 to 1914

Extracts from this document...


1. Introduction The period during 1760 to 1914 was quite a crucial and meaningful age for the global economy. For most European countries, the industrial revolution completely changed the old pattern of economic development, which has been lasted for thousands of years, into a modern one and boosted the economic growth significantly. For the rest of the world, their conditions were distinct. Some countries changed and grew up in the period such as America and Japan, while others still kept the old pattern so that slightly developed or even regressed, for instance, China. The states in different nations played variety roles in the economic change; some facilitated the development while others hindered the forward processes. This essay will select Britain controlled by Hanoverian government at that time, which was the first industrial country world wide, and, in stark contrast, China which used to be a dominant economy but was left by the rapid advancing world during the Qing dynasty, then comparing the roles of their states in economic change. The outline of the essay is as follow: Section 2 contrasts the fiscal policies in influencing economy. Section 3 compares the two tapes of commercial regulations and how they influenced development. Section 4 analyzes the role of the states in structural changes. ...read more.


However, it urged the changing process by encouraging people to find jobs in innovative sectors and forced them to export without intending. By contrast, although the central revenue as a percentage of national income in China was low, there was no incentive in innovation and people was exploited by local government and could not export, they could only continue the old pattern. Thus, the Chinese state actually hampered the economic change by taxation whereas British facilitated the change. 3. Commercial regulation and change The Hanoverian government's action in terms of commerce was quite successful; they made great efforts in boosting business development. Cottrell (1980) mentioned that partnership was allowed in starting or expanding business, and firms were allowed to "raise capital through the sale of stocks and shares." By these direct regulating methods, running a business became easier to start and expand than ever before. Apart from these, some indirect regulations has also been taken. Lambert (1971) claimed that the state had assisted in the developing tremendously by "repealing restrictive statutes or by encouraging the courts to neglect the enforcement of those areas of the common law which had hindered private exchanges and initiatives." Furthermore, Stearns (1975) indicated that those "local tolls and other barriers" were cut down. ...read more.


Therefore, a large number of labours in agriculture were still needed to supply food for the overall population. To conclude, British state played an active role in structural change by providing well-defined property right for labours, publishing wise acts and supporting the use of machines, while Chinese state contributed little because of under the restriction of traditional ideology and lack of machinery supports. 5. Conclusion In general, this essay compared and contrasted the role of British and Chinese state in economic change between 1760 and 1914 mainly focusing on taxes policies, commercial regulation, and effect of states in structural change. British state mostly accelerated and facilitated the process of economic change by low taxes in innovative sectors and encouraged international trade by high taxation, although without intention; informed direct and indirect commercial regulation as well as opening trade; wise acts and actions in structural change. Whereas, Chinese state mostly hindered the transform of economy by no incentive for innovative sectors provided by taxation and corruptions in local government; restricting commercial gatherings as well as barrier to trade; little effect in structural change. As a result, British economy developed rapidly in the period and became the center of the world while China still kept the pre-modern mode, weak in economy and power. Accordingly, it was invaded and experienced great social and political upheaval in 20th century. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1800-1899 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1800-1899 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    One of the most controversial issues of British Economic History is the living standards ...

    4 star(s)

    Political and Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press It is clearly desirable to judge the living standards during industrialisation not only in terms of GDP per person,but to examine also other factors like economic welfare or quality of life.

  2. British transport during the Industrial Revolution

    The iron needed for signalling equipment, rolling stock, locomotives and most importantly new rails, caused the railways to have a great effect on the iron and steel industry.16 Another industry that benefited from the railways was the brickmaking industry. In the early years when railway building was still in progress,

  1. Industrial revolution implies dramatic changes in production techniques , but recent evidence suggests that ...

    Even if we agree that dramatic changes happened in production techniques during industrial revolution , these changes influenced only some limited sectors of the British Economy and did not contribute impressively to the economy as a whole during the ''traditional'' era of industrial revolution 1760-1850.

  2. 'It has been claimed that Britains financial institutions were too oriented towards overseas investment ...

    foreign investments,or in other words that there are no biased markets against domestic investment. What is not clear,are the consequences to the domestic British industry of this massive transfer of funds. Some argued that if these funds had been invested domestically,they could be used to develop new technologies and new

  1. It has been argued that Britains poor development of industries based on science and ...

    Even when adjustments were made and new machinery were installed,owners were not discharging employees in order to avoid strikes. This led to over-manning and to a situation ''inappropriate to the conditions of mechanised mining''.Similarly,in cotton industry,the introduction of self-acting mule came as a result of disaffection and strikes among spinners.

  2. Influences that led to change within the system of nations in the period ...

    The nations that allied to defeat him sat down to decide the fate of France and the borders of the involved nations. The Peace of Paris was the initial meeting that declared the war over and there it was

  1. To what extent can Britishness be equated with Protestantism during the long eighteenth century?

    By maintaining this sense of distinction throughout the period, British foreign policy on the continent could easily be defined as having religious overtones. The nine years War of the 1690s, followed soon after by the war of Spanish succession and as far as the 1750s in the seven years War were fought against Catholic enemies.

  2. Why did Britain industrialise earlier than Germany?

    Firstly, a banking system to support invention and development. An insurance industry, meaning that people became more willing to undertake monetarily hazardous ventures and finally, a stock-exchange, allowing the wealthy to lend money to those who needed it for commercial and industrial reasons.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work