• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the suggestion that it is pointless to analyse religious experiences.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the suggestion that it is pointless to analyse religious experiences. A religious experience is defined as a non-empirical event in which the individual(s) concerned makes direct contact with 'a higher entity' (in relation to or associated with God), and experiences a sense of wonder, insight, holiness and profundity. To this end, the individual may interpret the experience by following an experimental or a prepositional approach: the former allows the experience to speak for itself, without trying to define exactly what happened, whilst the latter extracts from the experience certain definitive propositions, which are then claimed to be religious truths. As a result, when we come to examine such events, we must therefore consider whether it leads to an exclusivist or inclusivist interpretation. For example, if an individual claims that the particular experience, such as Muhammad hearing and reciting the words of the Qur'an offers a unique and infallible truth - the words of the Qur'an are believed to be the words of Allah - then they will have a corresponding authority. However, alternatively, an inclusivist might be willing to accept that the Qur'an contains valid religious truth, but not that it can claim absolute truth. ...read more.

Middle

For Buber, the relationship with God was 'I-Thou', in which God represented the 'Eternal Thou', and was therefore seen as present in every other 'Thou' that we encounter (a similar view to Soren Kierkegarrd). However, there have also been various challenges to the view that religious experiences are meaningful and illustrate contact with a 'higher entity'. In 'Philosophy of Religion', John Hick stated: "In short, any special event or experience which can be constituted as manifesting the divine can also be constituted in other ways (and accordingly cannot carry the weight of a proof of God's existence)". Immanuel Kant (In a 'Critique of Practical Reason') also dismissed the validity of religious experiences on the grounds "that it is impossible to speculate about anything (originating from) beyond the limits of time and space (i.e. a spirit) when we are confined to them", whilst Ludwig Wittgenstein also expressed a very similar view, in which he famously declared in the final sentence of his work, Tractatus, "whereof we cannot speak, thereof we must remain silent". Furthermore, it is also important to make reference to the belief advocated by Sigmund Freud, who 'In the Future of an Illusion', argued that religion (and religious events) ...read more.

Conclusion

To this end, it is significant to make reference to the verification principle advocated by A.J.Ayer, which examines whether religious claims can be shown to be true, and the falsification principle (closely associated with Anthony Flew), which considers whether such statements can be shown to be false. In conclusion, it is clearly apparent that although there are various forms of religious experience, there are also contrasting decisions between many philosophers and psychologists as to whether such events can be considered of any significance and hold any true meaning. My personal view is that such events are undoubtedly 'meaningful' for the individual who experiences them, and are therefore an important element in a believer's faith. I can also appreciate the views of Jung and Durkheim, who are not concerned with proving the validity or religious experiences (or God), but are more interested in the positive role religion has in society. However, this does not detract from the various problems associated with such events including the fact that religious experience cannot be authenticated by means of intellectual or scientific proof (a factor which is relied upon ever more so in the modern 'scientific' era) and that each event is open to one's interpretation. James Yates ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. What is distinctive about the Existential approach to working with addiction? Discuss.

    The lack of meaning in one's life is a prevalent root in addiction because a person who feels an emptiness and nothingness inside themselves tries to deny, hide from or fill the emptiness through addictive behaviours. Lack of awareness of a meaning worth living for, initiates an 'existential vacuum' an experience coined by Frankl (1964).

  2. Post-Atheism: from Apophatic Theology to "Minimal Religion"

    It is fitting to speak only of the theomorphism of the New Middle Ages, since it alone imparts to all things and all created works the form of the Other, of the absent God, of the religious unconscious. An example of ancient theomorphism is the mandala an Oriental figurative symbol, whose unconscious religious substance was studied by C.

  1. Consider in depth the different forms of religious language and evaluate how far they ...

    Millar Burrows thought that myths are a 'symbolic, approximate expression of truth'. This meaning that they contain truths but are not literally true. In a similar fashion to Symbols, Myths are only meaningful to those who choose to interpret them in such a way as for them to possess meaning.

  2. Ludwig Wittgenstein's study of religious language.

    what function they have. Braithwaite adds weight to the argument when he states that 'this function could be to promote particular behaviour.'6 However, Wittgenstein's theory is not immune to criticism. It is very difficult to see how the religious 'language game' could be totally isolated from any other.

  1. Discuss the claim that religious language is meaningless

    The difference between cognitive and non-cognitive statements also arose one particular philosopher, R. M. Hare. He stated that cognitive statements could be determined meaningless or meaningful with verification but not non-cognitive ones such as religious statements. He said that they are not factual but still have meaning because it influences the way we look at things.

  2. Comparing, Contrasting and Paralleling Hinduism, Buddhism and Sikhism

    It shows a sign of growth in wisdom. Turbans are tied in many different patterns and styles reflecting the wisdom of the specific person. Just like Hindus, Sikhs do believe in arranged marriages. Marriage, called Anand Sanskar, is taken as one of the most important ceremonies, thus making divorce not part of the religion.

  1. Explain what is meant by verification and falsification in the context of debates about ...

    beliefs, for example, believers give reasons that maintain God's goodness whatever evidence is offered to the contrary and Flew stated that these constant qualifications render religious statements meaningless, because they die the 'death of a thousand qualification'.

  2. Compare St Augstine and Rousseau's view of justifying authority and power.

    According to his social contract, Sovereign is the absolute supreme constituted by the general will, government is an intermediate body between subjects and Sovereign carrying executive functions, and subjects, clearly refers to citizens (Rousseau, 2004). His elaboration of applicable forms of government is relatively dialectic, which indicates that there is

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work