• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the suggestion that it is pointless to analyse religious experiences.

Extracts from this document...


Discuss the suggestion that it is pointless to analyse religious experiences. A religious experience is defined as a non-empirical event in which the individual(s) concerned makes direct contact with 'a higher entity' (in relation to or associated with God), and experiences a sense of wonder, insight, holiness and profundity. To this end, the individual may interpret the experience by following an experimental or a prepositional approach: the former allows the experience to speak for itself, without trying to define exactly what happened, whilst the latter extracts from the experience certain definitive propositions, which are then claimed to be religious truths. As a result, when we come to examine such events, we must therefore consider whether it leads to an exclusivist or inclusivist interpretation. For example, if an individual claims that the particular experience, such as Muhammad hearing and reciting the words of the Qur'an offers a unique and infallible truth - the words of the Qur'an are believed to be the words of Allah - then they will have a corresponding authority. However, alternatively, an inclusivist might be willing to accept that the Qur'an contains valid religious truth, but not that it can claim absolute truth. ...read more.


For Buber, the relationship with God was 'I-Thou', in which God represented the 'Eternal Thou', and was therefore seen as present in every other 'Thou' that we encounter (a similar view to Soren Kierkegarrd). However, there have also been various challenges to the view that religious experiences are meaningful and illustrate contact with a 'higher entity'. In 'Philosophy of Religion', John Hick stated: "In short, any special event or experience which can be constituted as manifesting the divine can also be constituted in other ways (and accordingly cannot carry the weight of a proof of God's existence)". Immanuel Kant (In a 'Critique of Practical Reason') also dismissed the validity of religious experiences on the grounds "that it is impossible to speculate about anything (originating from) beyond the limits of time and space (i.e. a spirit) when we are confined to them", whilst Ludwig Wittgenstein also expressed a very similar view, in which he famously declared in the final sentence of his work, Tractatus, "whereof we cannot speak, thereof we must remain silent". Furthermore, it is also important to make reference to the belief advocated by Sigmund Freud, who 'In the Future of an Illusion', argued that religion (and religious events) ...read more.


To this end, it is significant to make reference to the verification principle advocated by A.J.Ayer, which examines whether religious claims can be shown to be true, and the falsification principle (closely associated with Anthony Flew), which considers whether such statements can be shown to be false. In conclusion, it is clearly apparent that although there are various forms of religious experience, there are also contrasting decisions between many philosophers and psychologists as to whether such events can be considered of any significance and hold any true meaning. My personal view is that such events are undoubtedly 'meaningful' for the individual who experiences them, and are therefore an important element in a believer's faith. I can also appreciate the views of Jung and Durkheim, who are not concerned with proving the validity or religious experiences (or God), but are more interested in the positive role religion has in society. However, this does not detract from the various problems associated with such events including the fact that religious experience cannot be authenticated by means of intellectual or scientific proof (a factor which is relied upon ever more so in the modern 'scientific' era) and that each event is open to one's interpretation. James Yates ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. Consider in depth the different forms of religious language and evaluate how far they ...

    Intrinsic attribution is where the attribute causes the quality in it's effect. For example 'Oranges are healthy in humans'. There is a caused relationship. Analogical language can be considered meaningful if we are willing to accept that by learning something that is in proportion or indirectly related to God then we are actually learning anything.

  2. What is distinctive about the Existential approach to working with addiction? Discuss.

    They are encouraged to accept ways they have lived in according to others expectations and introjections yet examine the ways they are not living true to, or authentically to, their own evaluations, beliefs, values and standards (Pesciallo, 2000). Goals for the future are explored and any hidden or unspoken talents are encouraged, recognised and elaborated on.

  1. Explain what is meant by verification and falsification in the context of debates about ...

    The Falsification Principle does not work for all statements but they are still meaningful. They cannot be falsified but yet we still understand the meaning behind them. Swinburne uses the example of toys in the cupboard, although one can

  2. Comparing, Contrasting and Paralleling Hinduism, Buddhism and Sikhism

    On this note, he began to preach to the people of his Punjab village in Talwandi. People began to believe the truth he spoke and soon he gained many followers. Guru Nanak truly spoke eloquently about reform and challenged the binding laws of other religion. In this Sikhism was born.

  1. Post-Atheism: from Apophatic Theology to "Minimal Religion"

    Although apophaticism is innate to Eastern Christianity, there is no denying its long-standing influence on Western spirituality. Evidence of it can be seen in the works of several Western Christian mystics, such as Meister Eckhart, Nicholas of Cusa, and Jacob Boehme, all of whom glimpsed the "foundationless foundation" of God himself, His rootedenss in nothing.

  2. Discuss D.H Lawrence as a Religious Write

    Lawrence further pins this progression down by using religious images explicitly. There is the Adam and Eve carving in The Rainbow, provoking a chain of Eden imagery that includes remembrances of pastoral idylls by Ursula - "One day she

  1. Discuss the claim that religious language is meaningless

    Flew says that Christians still hold that God is all good despite the existence of evil in the world. He then goes on to state that they make reasons for why God remains good, and this constant back up makes religious language meaningless.

  2. Compare St Augstine and Rousseau's view of justifying authority and power.

    rescue him; however, they were all assaulted and menaced by the local government. It was only when he escaped to the US embassy in Beijing, then was he able to petition for protection and fair treatment. Adopting Rousseauâs theory, it is clear that Chenâs natural rights are violated, which indicates

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work