• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Divergence or Convergence?' Were the British American colonies becoming more like or less like Britain and each other in the eighteenth century?

Extracts from this document...


In 1760, Benjamin Franklin declared that of the fourteen British colonies on the American mainland, no two were alike[1]. Sixteen years later the Declaration of Independence was signed separating these colonies from their mother land and partnering these supposed different colonies together. Topics including political and human rights, social development and class society need to be examined when comparing the colonies and Britain in the 18th Century. As well as these differences between the colonies and Britain, the divisions between northern and southern colonies highlight that though the emigrants shared many beliefs, others considerations such as slavery divided them. The majority of colonists were still loyal to the British crown during the period prior to 1776[2], even considering the differences between those British subjects in the colonies from those at home. In the context of British America, this essay will consider the theory that though the colonies had separate governors, laws and interests, they converged together during the mid to late 18th century. Sir Walter Ralegh dispatched an expedition in 1585 that landed at Roanoake Island[3]. This was the first manoeuvre by the English crown to establish colonies in America. The colony at Roanoake ultimately failed, but continued efforts saw later expeditions to Virginia and New England succeed. ...read more.


The puritans moved away from their community and traditionalism towards a more individual and modern outlook[12] just like those back in Britain and in the other colonies. By the mid-18th century, the colonists in the south had become the wealthiest in America. Residents of Charleston, South Carolina were earning four times more, per capita, than the tobacco farmers of Virginia, and six times the amount of those in New York and Philadelphia[13]. These white settlers accumulated considerable wealth, and the richest of these were able to live a luxurious, almost anglicised lifestyle. English style mansions were built and in urban centres such as Charleston and Savannah, and cultural institutions such as libraries, theatres and race courses usually seen only within the empire back home in Britain, were also erected[14]. The social development of those in the colonies, from north to south, led to a convergence of the differing colonies and closer to the British experience throughout the British Atlantic world. This development was not immediately brought with the original immigrants but was the result of the exploitation of the economic realities of their new environment. Tenant farmers back in Britain where dependent on the state, whereas in the colonies most free men had conditions which permitted them to employ themselves and their families[15]. ...read more.


The fear of increasing British governance in America threated that freedom. The development of an American social society eventually led them believe that they had to fight for their own independence, and with the empire unwilling to let these colonists who routinely ignored imperial regulations[22] drift from their control, conflict was surely and shortly on the horizon. Considering the evidence presented, it can be concluded that not only did 18th century British American society converged both together as colonies, but also became more like the mother nation than at any time since the colonies were established. Conversely this want for the luxuries and political equality of those back in Britain, combined a new found independent lifestyle, led the colonists to want for the best of both worlds, and it was this which would ultimately separate them from Britain. The fear of an aristocratic upper class found in Britain and a racial divide between white and black saw the colonial elite, surrender more social equality and political freedom to the land owners of the American seaboard. The wider implication of the convergence of the two regions was that the colonist did not feel inferior to those in Britain, and indeed now wanted for more. Lack of representation at Westminster, and being required to pay taxes to a parliament where no colonist had a seat would very quickly fuel an independence movement that would create a war and ultimately the separation of the two regions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1700-1799 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1700-1799 essays

  1. Although the American Civil War started after the Confederate States seceded from the Union ...

    For example, older, established states such as Virginia had stark differences to that of newer states in the west. And the colloquial term describing the 'deep south' was also different to the 'upper south'. The same stand for the North, much of the north was industrialised, however not all of it was.

  2. Is the Cultural Revolution best characterised as a top-level power struggle or a mass ...

    He constantly shifted the boundaries within politics, regularly changing the attitudes and levels of radicalism of his policies. This in itself adds a further complex dimension to the Cultural Revolution movement, making interpretations of events increasingly difficult.

  1. Define the changing relationship between masters and slaves in the antebellum South

    and defined their r�les as slaves, it was not until this date that the first extensive legal code explicitly defined slaves as property: "All Negro, mulatto, and Indian slaves within this dominion shall be held to be real estate and shall descend unto heirs and widows according to the custom of land inheritance."

  2. Why did the Industrial Revolution Occur in Britain First?

    For example, as Great Britain had protected colonial markets for both staple manufactured products like woollens and newly emerging products like cotton, these two competing industries were able to thrive alongside one another.19 Further demonstrating Great Britain?s act of protecting its industries and promoting its exports was its introduction of

  1. From the available sources, what can we say about the roles and status of ...

    ?and though entire strangers to the comforts and conveniences of clothing, yet they sought with a native modesty to conceal by attitude what the want of covering would otherwise have revealed.?[12] Captain Phillip, applying European values, makes a point of ordering his officers not to consort with the indigenous women.

  2. To What Extent was Coal a Cause of the 18th Century Industrial Revolution?

    [12] The actual absence of coal in Ireland, the Netherlands, and Northwest France does not explain why the Industrial Revolution did not take place in those regions. Being recipients of coal suppliers meant that these nations paid higher prices for coal through much of Britain?s Industrial Revolution.[13] McCloskey argues that

  1. How was crime kept within tolerable bounds in England in the Eighteenth century?

    1780, to catch the Luddites in Nottinghamshire in 1811-12, put down peaceful protestors at Peterloo in 1819 and the Captain Swing Agricultural protests in 1830-1. In particular, London was different to most area in relation to crime where instruments of control were weaker, there was a highly transient population and

  2. To what extent did Britain benefit from her Empire in the Eighteenth century? ...

    Certainly, Britain saw itself as resisting claims to the empires of its European rivals rather than as a power seeking an empire of its own. This concern in most clearly manifested in the French involvement in the American War of Independence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work