• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do we have duties either to animals or to the environment if so on what basis?

Extracts from this document...


Do we have duties either to animal or to the environment if so on what basis? Discussions on the ethical treatment of animals and the damage being inflicted on the environment by the human populace have become evermore mainstream debates. The effects and inherent dangers of global warming are already causing peoples attitudes toward the environment to change. It is widely believed that if we don't do something to prevent the current demise of the earth, there will be disastrous consequences for everyone. Although many acknowledge the damage humanity is causing to the environment and to animals, is it fair to say we have a duty to stop it, or is it necessary to continue in this way for the benefit of the human race? I believe humanity does have a duty to both the environment and to animals, and in this essay is shall be analysing why I believe this to be the case and whether there is a duty regardless as to whether or not there is a benefit or utility to humans. Firstly it is important to identify what is meant when we say a duty. According to Kant duties are appropriated through moral law, which is defined by the categorical imperative (1). ...read more.


However any duty paid to animals is only because of the utility the human gains from the animal's existence, for example a dog owner only feeds and shelters the dog because it gives them companionship. Examples like this are entirely self interested in their nature and the duty only exists so long as there is a utility to be obtained from the animal. If an animal bears no utility to the human alive, it is most likely the animal will be used for food. It is fairly common to find this hypocrisy amongst most pet owners. I would therefore argue that it is necessary to have a duty to all animals regardless of any self interested utility that can be gained from an animal. There must be a principal of equality with regards to the duty of animals to ensure that all animals receive the same basic rights. However Peter Singler argues that 'the extension of the basic principle of equality from one group to another does not imply that we must treat both groups in exactly the same way, or grant exactly the same rights to both groups. Whether we should do so will depend on the nature of the members of the two groups. ...read more.


So far the only duty shown to animals is only on self-interested occasions when an animal can provide some utility to the human. For humans to have a duty to animals they must now provide the same basic principles of rights to all animals. As for the environment, the repercussions of over a hundred years of mistreatment to the environment are starting to become apparent. Global warming has started to melt the polar ice caps and heat waves are causing more and more deaths. It is the moral duty of everyone to prevent habitats from being destroyed, animals killed and for the prolonged existence of humanity. Equality of humans has gradually gotten better and better with instances like the civil rights movement yet despite a much more enlightened society, animal suffering has arguably gotten worse, it is the duty of humanity towards animals to help stop this suffering. Endnotes (1) Immanuel Kant, (2004) "The groundwork of the Meta physics of Morals" (Cambridge University Press, 1998) (2) Immanuel Kant, (2004) "The groundwork of the Meta physics of Morals" (Cambridge University Press, 1998) (3) Regan and Singer (eds.), Animal Rights and Human Obligations, (New Jersey, 1989), p.4 (4) Regan and Singer (eds.), Animal Rights and Human Obligations, (New Jersey, 1989), p.5 (5) 'Environmental Ethics' Introduction in Stanford Encyclopedia of (http://plato.stanford. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. Kant's Philosophy

    The will is an autonomous legislator in the field of action. "So act," says one of the Kantian categorical imperatives, "that your will can be considered as instituting a universal moral legislation." But if we act thus, we are already in the suprasensible and unconditioned world. This conclusion deserves examination.

  2. Universalism of Human Rights

    Human rights can only be enforced through communities, not by individuals. The world does not at the moment support a complete Universalist approach to human rights. But it is clear that since World War Two, there has been a shift towards this ideology, by the creation of the international community and the institutions that support and govern it.

  1. Famine purposes a great problem to humanity. Singer explains how famine in east Bengal ...

    Thus, the distribution of that property, to whatever means it goes to, is determined by the owner of that property. One cannot label them morally bad, unless he or she harms society. By not donating to the Bengal relief fund, a person or household cannot be labelled morally bad because

  2. Provide a discussion on the problems associated with defining consciousness. Introduction Defining consciousness is ...

    REM is characterized by a highly aroused internal state and yet the body is almost paralyzed. Dement and Kleitman (1957) found that sleepers who were woken from REM sleep also tended to report dreaming. We know we sleep partly for physiological recuperation, some researchers such as Webb (1974), argue that

  1. Free essay

    Ought I to donate so much money to famine relief that I do not ...

    Singer uses the idea of that if the person is close to me I am more likely to help them than help someone who is thousands of miles away from me. Singer uses the example of a walking along and seeing a child who is drowning in a shallow pond.

  2. Why Should I be moral?

    by the fear of guilt that we would otherwise be plagued by were we not to do this deed. There is a major flaw in this statement, for if we are amoral and do not care for the lives of others, why would we then feel guilty if we did not do this good deed in question?

  1. Comparing, Contrasting and Paralleling Hinduism, Buddhism and Sikhism

    The marriage ceremony takes place around a fire where a priest chants Sanskrit verses. He then leads the bride and groom to seven significant steps around the fire. This is the most important thing within the ceremony. Bells are then sounded and offerings are made to the fire.

  2. In both Immanuel Kants Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals and John Stuart Mills ...

    In this way, the theory appears to wane, but a common response to this that one must sincerely agree to what he or she wills. Simply put, the bully must picture a stronger adversary than he or she is and then consent to the terms of the universalization.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work