• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does Descartes manage to defeat scepticism and leave room for human error?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Does Descartes manage to defeat scepticism and leave room for human error? Descartes believes he has defeated scepticism by acknowledging the idea that there clearly and distinctly exists a being that is 'independent and complete'1- God. He finds it necessary to demonstrate the existence of God in order to seek knowledge of things other than the assertion 'I am thinking, therefore I am'. Descartes highlights that there is a contradiction in saying that God is a deceiver because that would imply that God is malicious. Furthermore Descartes says that within him is 'a faculty of judgement'2 of which he is certain has come from God. Thus for Descartes God would not give him a faculty that would make him capable of error. Despite these observations Descartes acknowledges that we are capable of error. The latter seems inconsistent with the previous statements. Since God is not the source of human error Descartes works on finding an alternative explanation. ...read more.

Middle

Due to its unrestricted nature the will is free to make judgment about things which we do not perceive clearly. When we make judgments about things for which we may not have a clear perception we fall into error. The will, which we misuse because we are imperfect, is the tool with which we make such judgments about perceptions of the intellect. Thus this, the will, is the cause of human error. It appears that Descartes is proposing that having the freedom of will is a good thing because it allows us to work towards truth. However this begs the question that God could have created humans as beings with the will to never go wrong - that is God could have created us as perfect beings. Descartes can deal with this by saying that 'it is the nature of a finite intellect that its scope should not extend to everything'.4 If we knew everything, that is never make an error, because we were a mirror image of God we would be robots and human life would be meaningless. ...read more.

Conclusion

In their eagerness to know the truth humans sometimes commit themselves to doing precisely this because they have been conditioned to. This approach is wrong according to Descartes. I can only avoid error by 'withholding judgement'6 on that which I do not clearly and distinctly perceive. However I do I know that that which the intellect can perceives in not erroneous? The answer lies in the idea that that which is God given would not be impaired because God is no deceiver. It is pointed out in the Third Set of Objections that Descartes assumes we have freedom of the will without providing us with a reason for its existence. Descartes replies that 'our freedom is very evident by the natural light'.7 Our initial reaction is that this reply is not sufficiently explanatory. 1 AT VII 53 (CSM, II, 37) 2 AT VII 54 (CSM, II, 37) 3 AT VII 57 (CSM, II, 40) 4 AT VII 18 (CSM, I, 204) 5 AT VII 60 (CSM, II, 42) 6 AT VII 62 (CSM, II, 43) 7 AT VII 191 (CSM, II, 134) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This is a good start to an essay, which cuts off abruptly before a conclusion has been reached. The writing is lucid and quickly reaches the point. Presentation of Descartes' views is mostly accurate and some fair evaluation of these views is offered. As it stands, much of the essay doesn't really address the question. If the essay were to continue like this to present a basic conclusion as to whether, on balance, Descartes' arguments are successful, it would be deserving of a moderately good mark.

Marked by teacher David Moss 01/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and contrast rationalist and empiricist approaches to human nature.

    3 star(s)

    Furthermore Descartes believed the body to be a physical biological machine being driven by animal spirit and human action is caused by reason, reflex and emotion.

  2. Critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of political freedom defined in terms of negative ...

    walk or not, but how many doors are open to me, and the extent to which they are open. The obstacles Berlin expresses refers to the notion, theorised by Plato and Freud, of the capacity to act freely in the internal, psychological sphere rather than the external sphere.

  1. If a tree falls in a forest and there is no one there

    Therefore, yellowness is no more a quality of a banana than painfulness is of a pin. Despite this, Boyle is confident that at least some sensible qualities of an object are directly relative to it its material qualities such as shape and size.

  2. Waiting for Godot - Meaningless of Life

    They hope that Godot will come next day to save them, but they cannot know whether he will really come or not. (Hayman 1968: 5) Their lives seem to be decided by Godot, and they have lost their will and power to decide not to wait.

  1. Is rule-utilitarianism a genuine alternative to act-utilitarianism? If so, does it have any advantages ...

    If you can adapt a rule for every alternative situation, then surely the two forms of utilitarianism will overlap until eventually they become equivalent. According to D. Lyons, in the end, rule-utilitarianism 'would in fact consist of one rule only, the act-utilitarian one; maximize probable benefit.'

  2. Epicurus claimed that pleasure is "the starting point and goal of the happy life ...

    any real pain, suffering and certainly not death if they were left unsatisfied. The third group of desires, Epicurus regards as 'unnatural and unnecessary'. While these desires may also be intense, there is no pain and suffering if these desires are not met.

  1. The Influence of Repentance on the Self and Society. In his essay Of Repentance ...

    Montaigne brushes over why one might act in this manner, which leads to why this lifestyle is so common: standards and laws. Human society has laws that dictate what is acceptable behavior from unacceptable behavior, and for many people this is stressful and causes them to represent themselves differently to the world.

  2. What is the mind body problem? Provide details of some responses to it from ...

    From his materialist perspective, Aristotle argued that the study of the mind (psychology) should be considered to be a physical science (Carrier, 1995). His work in this new science focused on investigating concepts and processes that are still major subjects for investigation in modern psychology, such as memory and emotion (Carrier, 1995).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work