• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does Descartes manage to defeat scepticism and leave room for human error?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Does Descartes manage to defeat scepticism and leave room for human error? Descartes believes he has defeated scepticism by acknowledging the idea that there clearly and distinctly exists a being that is 'independent and complete'1- God. He finds it necessary to demonstrate the existence of God in order to seek knowledge of things other than the assertion 'I am thinking, therefore I am'. Descartes highlights that there is a contradiction in saying that God is a deceiver because that would imply that God is malicious. Furthermore Descartes says that within him is 'a faculty of judgement'2 of which he is certain has come from God. Thus for Descartes God would not give him a faculty that would make him capable of error. Despite these observations Descartes acknowledges that we are capable of error. The latter seems inconsistent with the previous statements. Since God is not the source of human error Descartes works on finding an alternative explanation. ...read more.

Middle

Due to its unrestricted nature the will is free to make judgment about things which we do not perceive clearly. When we make judgments about things for which we may not have a clear perception we fall into error. The will, which we misuse because we are imperfect, is the tool with which we make such judgments about perceptions of the intellect. Thus this, the will, is the cause of human error. It appears that Descartes is proposing that having the freedom of will is a good thing because it allows us to work towards truth. However this begs the question that God could have created humans as beings with the will to never go wrong - that is God could have created us as perfect beings. Descartes can deal with this by saying that 'it is the nature of a finite intellect that its scope should not extend to everything'.4 If we knew everything, that is never make an error, because we were a mirror image of God we would be robots and human life would be meaningless. ...read more.

Conclusion

In their eagerness to know the truth humans sometimes commit themselves to doing precisely this because they have been conditioned to. This approach is wrong according to Descartes. I can only avoid error by 'withholding judgement'6 on that which I do not clearly and distinctly perceive. However I do I know that that which the intellect can perceives in not erroneous? The answer lies in the idea that that which is God given would not be impaired because God is no deceiver. It is pointed out in the Third Set of Objections that Descartes assumes we have freedom of the will without providing us with a reason for its existence. Descartes replies that 'our freedom is very evident by the natural light'.7 Our initial reaction is that this reply is not sufficiently explanatory. 1 AT VII 53 (CSM, II, 37) 2 AT VII 54 (CSM, II, 37) 3 AT VII 57 (CSM, II, 40) 4 AT VII 18 (CSM, I, 204) 5 AT VII 60 (CSM, II, 42) 6 AT VII 62 (CSM, II, 43) 7 AT VII 191 (CSM, II, 134) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This is a good start to an essay, which cuts off abruptly before a conclusion has been reached. The writing is lucid and quickly reaches the point. Presentation of Descartes' views is mostly accurate and some fair evaluation of these views is offered. As it stands, much of the essay doesn't really address the question. If the essay were to continue like this to present a basic conclusion as to whether, on balance, Descartes' arguments are successful, it would be deserving of a moderately good mark.

Marked by teacher David Moss 01/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. God Of Small Things - Significance of the title.

    It is making Big Things out of Small Things. God Of Small Things is also depicted as someone who can do only one thing at a time, the God Of Loss. That is how Ammu imagines Velutha in her dream (p.217).

  2. Waiting for Godot - Meaningless of Life

    They hope that Godot will come next day to save them, but they cannot know whether he will really come or not. (Hayman 1968: 5) Their lives seem to be decided by Godot, and they have lost their will and power to decide not to wait.

  1. "Pilgrimage is just an excuse for a holiday!"

    This is a strong reason as, yet again, is worship and faith, a material or spiritual thing? People claim that a place is holy when it's actually all a hoax as this was the case when someone claimed to find the shroud that Jesus had been wrapped in, all for a profit!

  2. In this paper, I am going to compare and contrast Hume's empiricism to Descartes' ...

    The notion of necessary connection and causation come from the fact that we have experienced "constantly conjoined" actions in the past. Free will for Hume means, the "power of acting or not acting, according to the determination of the will"(Hume, 63).

  1. The Problem of the Grudge Informer describes a situation that two major philosophical theories ...

    Their acts of what a Purple Shirtist might call patriotism were protected by "the law of the land" (Fuller 160). The first deputy goes on to say that, like our newfound democratic justice system, the Purple Shirts operated under the law even though those laws might be wrong.

  2. Compare Aristotle and Locke on private property. How are their views similar? different?

    Specifically, he says that many people will have the tendency to take advantage of the benevolent communal style of property ownership. This "free-rider" tendency does indeed undermine Aristotle's argument that his community is most virtuous. A "tragedy of the commons" situation could develop in this situation as no one person has a stake in the land.

  1. Explain how source criticism and form criticism have contributed to our understanding of the ...

    Since form criticism has pointed out that the many different settings and types of traditional units that existed in ancient Israel, we can be certain that J did not write from whole cloth. He brought together old poetry, stories, and songs of the exodus that were living.

  2. Essay on MLK's Letter from Birmingham Jail for Philosophy Class

    King references Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, who lived to a higher moral law and refused to compromise to lower standards, even if the consequences included death. They were endangered because of their unwavering faith and adherence to the truth, much like King.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work