• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

Examples of how fallacies can be used in argumentative writing.

Extracts from this document...


Ricky C. Camus / BSAT3-2 January 30, 2012 Fallacy Examples from newspaper clips and magazines, book passages. Appeal to Misleading Authority The only policy that effectively reduces public shootings is right-to-carry laws. Allowing citizens to carry concealed handguns reduces violent crime. In the 31 states that have passed right-to-carry laws since the mid-1980s, the number of multiple-victim public shootings and other violent crimes has dropped dramatically. Murders fell by 7.65%, rapes by 5.2%, aggravated assaults by 7%, and robberies by 3%. Explanation: These examples are the use of misleadingly precise numbers, specifically, "7.65%" and "5.2%" in the anti-gun control example. Especially in social science studies, percentage precision to the second decimal place is meaningless, since it is well within the margin of error on such measurements. It is a typical tactic of pseudo-scientific argumentation to use overly-precise numbers in an attempt to impress and intimidate the audience. Source: "Fact Card", Handgun Control, Inc. Complex Question "How am I to get in?" asked Alice again, in a louder tone. "Are you to get in at all?" said the Footman, "That's the first question, you know." Explanation: A question with a false, disputed, or question-begging presupposition. Source: Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, Ch. 6. Argumentum ad Hominem Osama Bin Laden: ...At the time that they condemn any Muslim who calls for his right, they receive the highest top official of the Irish Republican Army at the White House as a political leader, while woe, all woe is the Muslims if they cry out for their rights. Wherever we look, we find the US as the leader of terrorism and crime in the world. The US does not consider it a terrorist act to throw atomic bombs at nations thousands of miles away, when it would not be possible for those bombs to hit military troops only. These bombs were rather thrown at entire nations, including women, children and elderly people and up to this day the traces of those bombs remain in Japan. ...read more.


Source: Basil Cottle, The Plight of English: Ambiguities, Cacophonies and Other Violations of Our Language (Arlington House, 1975), pp. 33-34. Red Herring The most telling moment in last night's [State of the Union] speech came after the president noted that "key provisions of the Patriot Act are set to expire next year." In response, notes the New York Times, "some critics in Congress applauded enthusiastically." If Osama bin Laden watched the speech, one imagines him applauding too. Explanation: That Osama bin Laden might approve of the expiration of provisions of the Patriot Act does not show that American critics are wrong to also approve, since the reasons for their approval are different. Some Americans oppose parts of the Patriot Act because they believe that it infringes upon the rights of Americans without significantly helping to prevent terrorism. They may be wrong, but that doesn't make them an al Qaeda cheering squad. Source: James Taranto, "The al Qaeda Cheering Section", Best of the Web Today, 1/21/2004 False Precision Implausibly precise statistics...are often bogus. Consider a precise number that is well known to generations of parents and doctors: the normal human body temperature of 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Recent investigations involving millions of measurements have revealed that this number is wrong; normal human body temperature is actually 98.2 degrees Fahrenheit. The fault, however, lies not with Dr. Wunderlich's original measurements-they were averaged and sensibly rounded to the nearest degree: 37 degrees Celsius. When this temperature was converted to Fahrenheit, however, the rounding was forgotten, and 98.6 was taken to be accurate to the nearest tenth of a degree. Had the original interval between 36.5 degrees Celsius and 37.5 degrees Celsius been translated, the equivalent Fahrenheit temperatures would have ranged from 97.7 degrees to 99.5 degrees. Explanation: Occurs when numerical data are presented in a manner that implies better precision than is actually the case; since precision is a limit to accuracy, Source: John Allen Paulos, A Mathematician Reads the Newspaper (Anchor, 1995), p. ...read more.


Jones is responsible for the rise in crime." The increase in taxes might or might not be one factor in the rising crime rates, but the argument hasn't shown us that one caused the other. Explanation: To avoid the post hoc fallacy, the arguer would need to give us some explanation of the process by which the tax increase is supposed to have produced higher crime rates. And that's what you should do to avoid committing this fallacy: If you say that A causes B, you should have something more to say about how A caused B than just that A came first and B came later. Slippery slope "Animal experimentation reduces our respect for life. If we don't respect life, we are likely to be more and more tolerant of violent acts like war and murder. Soon our society will become a battlefield in which everyone constantly fears for their lives. It will be the end of civilization. To prevent this terrible consequence, we should make animal experimentation illegal right now." Since animal experimentation has been legal for some time and civilization has not yet ended, it seems particularly clear that this chain of events won't necessarily take place. Even if we believe that experimenting on animals reduces respect for life, and loss of respect for life makes us more tolerant of violence, that may be the spot on the hillside at which things stop-we may not slide all the way down to the end of civilization. And so we have not yet been given sufficient reason to accept the arguer's conclusion that we must make animal experimentation illegal right now. Explanation: Like post hoc, slippery slope can be a tricky fallacy to identify, since sometimes a chain of events really can be predicted to follow from a certain action. Here's an example that doesn't seem fallacious: "If I fail English 101, I won't be able to graduate. If I don't graduate, I probably won't be able to get a good job, and I may very well end up doing temp work or flipping burgers for the next year." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. Explain the major features of a mystical experience, using examples

    Passivity is the characteristic that Muslims have the largest problem with. This refers to a 'loss of control' to God and being totally overwhelmed by this. This may mean that God takes over the body, or that people act completely differently or write completely differently, for example, than they normally do.

  2. Kant's Philosophy

    All three emanate from subjective, non-rational grounds. The danger of utilitarianism lies in its embracing of baser instincts, while rejecting the indispensable role of reason and freedom in our actions. CHAPTER 5 INSIGHT OF SOME OF THE MASTER PIECE WORKS BY KANT The principal works of Kant's "critical period" are

  1. In this essay I will be explaining the just war theory which gives the ...

    As Michael Walzer said "We have extended the notion beyond the realm of these kinds of attacks across personal or state boundaries to include the notion of a humanitarian intervention. If somebody had gone into Rwanda to stop the massacre; that would have been a just war".10 Therefore it appears

  2. Religion and the Causes of Terrorism.

    While the Qur'an is not as specific and can be taken as the Al-Qa'ida group states it should be taken; die, and kill others, for your religion. "The believers who stay at home--apart from those that suffer a grave impediment--are not the equals of those who fight for the cause of God with their goods and their persons.

  1. What is Freud's explanation for the existence of religion? To what extent does it ...

    countries have gained a high level of civilization if we find that in them everything which can assist in the exploitation of the earth by man and in his protection against the forces of nature...is attended to and effectively carried out" (Freud, p.

  2. It is telling that the question Heidegger chooses to address is not what calls ...

    Here, Heidegger prompts us to learn to leap so that we might learn thinking. The stream which remains stream because of continuous, conscious change, so must we be willing to take the leap "to where everything is different, so different that it strikes us as strange."11 The estranging difference comes

  1. Many of the world's most dangerous terrorist groups claim religion as their motivation. How ...

    According to the Torah, violence is only acceptable in situations of self defense. The fundamentalist sect, Ultra-Orthodox Judaism, is divided into two groups, the Haredim (religiously most extreme), and the Religious-National Jews (religiously more moderate) (Shahak, 1). The core belief of the Ultra-Orthodox is that they are the latest link

  2. The Decline of the Public: Arendt's Aristotelian Attack on Modernity

    and eternity.28 Arendt argues, that the vita contemplativa, the life of the philosopher concerned only with the eternal, and the vita activa, the political life, are not mutually exclusive. To Plato and Socrates, a thinker "ceases to be concerned primarily with eternity" if he acts at all.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work