• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

French Revolution

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'The French Revolution: Causes and Outcomes' Braidot, Agostina Mores, Evangelina Instituto Superior de Profesorado n� 4 '�ngel C�rcano' E.D.I. - Social Studies III Ms Maggio June 22nd, 2010 Introduction In the last years of the eighteenth century, France lived a period of political and social commotion due to a number of factors which inevitably led to a massive revolt. That rebellion soon turned into a revolution of people deciding to rewrite their history and that of the modern world. Although Louis XVI's reign and his affairs in war were a major cause of a revolution, there are also other aspects which added to the chaotic situation, such as the high and unfair taxation and the influence of the Glorious and the American Revolution. The French Revolution Causes Lay (1960) remarks that Louis XVI's (see appendix 1, picture 1) lavish kingship together with the unequal social and economical condition of the lower classes triggered a violent revolt the world had never seen before. France's financial problems started several years before Louis XVI inherited the throne. Barnes and Noble (2010) claim that the French engagement in the Seven Years' War (1756-1763) made the country face a substantial deficit. Such an economic crisis was deepened when Louis XVI decided to grant the American aid for their revolution (1775-1783), and therefore partake in a war that would lead to France being close to bankruptcy. ...read more.

Middle

As claimed by Chavis (2009), a National Convention was elected with the purpose of writing a new constitution; however, the adoption of such was decided to be shelved until the country was at peace. What the National Convention first dictated was the overthrow of the monarchy and the declaration of France as a Republic. Nevertheless, the new French Republic was soon turned into a dictatorship, with Maximilien Robespierre at the head. The Reign of Terror period commenced. One of its first victims was the former king Louis XVI. According to Eye Witness to History [EWH] (1999), the National Convention tried Louis in 1792 for betraying his own people. The following year, on January 20th, Louis XVI's sentence was read: the king had to die. On the next morning, Louis was taken to the execution place, where the guillotine was awaiting him. Once the blade was down, the last king of France had ceased to exist (see Appendix 1, picture 4). No sooner had nine months passed than his wife, Marie Antoinette (see Appendix 1, picture 5), was condemned to death. She made her way to the blade on October 16th, 1793. Betts (2000) remarks that thousands of French people were beheaded at the guillotine. ...read more.

Conclusion

On the other hand, Kreis (2009) accounts for Thomas Paine's answer to Burke. In his The Rights of Man, Paine (see Appendix 1, picture 7) puts forward a republican government, with elected representatives, in contrast to the starkly sharp monarchies which "had done nothing but hide truth and dispense falsehood. Monarchy is the engine of human misery and oppression. Monarchy is the supreme evil. It is the obstacle to human improvement -it is hocus pocus" (p. 6). What is more, as Philp (2009) observes, some associations of working people, for instance, the Society for Constitutional Information (SCI) and the London Corresponding Society (LCS), reawoke, while new ones were created, to diminish the power of the well-to-do and to confer their prerogative to strive for parliamentary revision. This popular demand met the government's refusal and worsened the tensions among Whigs, which ended in the division of the party. Conclusion At the apex of the eighteenth century, the most established and glorious monarchy in Europe faced its most implacable enemy: its own people. The French Revolution meant the birth of a new republic. But it was born with the death of the king. Thereafter, what began as a time of hopeful changes, became the bloodiest tragedy known until that moment Nonetheless, the French Revolution constituted a social and political milestone in western history, changing forever the development of most nations far and wide. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1700-1799 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1700-1799 essays

  1. Through examining the historians Georges Lefebvre and Alfred Cobban, what are the underlying factors ...

    Lefebvre established the various levels of the bourgeois class through a measure of their income and their means of acquiring it. For example, financiers held the topmost place, as they were the wealthiest and "contractors who supplied the army and navy with all kinds of transport and provisions"11 and further

  2. Was the French revolution a Bourgeoisie revolution?

    the Estates-General in 1614 dictated that the two classes had to sit separately. Both Lefebvre and Cobban agree that it was this action which was the crucial turning point for the Bourgeoisie. They saw their interests were at odds with the Nobility and this realisation set the trigger, which detonated the Bourgeois, aim to control the Estates.

  1. The Bolsheviks did not seize power in October 1917, it fell into their hands

    Come October Kerensky's calls for aid would go unanswered. The more immediate effects saw the release from prison of Trotsky, Antonov-Ovseeeko and Dybenko, who alongside Lenin would be the brains behind the revolutionary brawn. The release of Trotsky in particular was to have two major consequences.

  2. Was the industrial Revolution a good thing?

    In 1842 Parliaments Royal Commission found out about the terrible working conditions. They passed acts that helped the workers, including the Mines Act of 1842 that banned females from working in the mines and the factories Act in 1833 which stated that no child under the age of nine must

  1. “The French Revolution was simply a product of Enlightenment thought.” How accurate is this ...

    With regard to Barruel, at least, it certainly shows that an historian's ability to analyse is not independent of their surroundings. It would have been impossible for Barruel and his contempary historians to view the French Revolution as a rebellion of the masses considering that 'masses' as such did not

  2. Why did the Industrial Revolution Occur in Britain First?

    Great Britain?s dependence on coal could be seen from the fact that in the early nineteenth century, it consumed fifteen million tons of coal a year, whereas the rest of continental Europe combined only consumed three million tons of coal.3 Great Britain used five times more coal than the rest of Europe combined.

  1. To what extent did Britain benefit from her Empire in the Eighteenth century? ...

    Wars and maritime prowess combined with a hatred of the French and Spanish fostered a sense of national identity in patriotism and xenophobia. However, the key driver in uniting England and Wales with Scotland and Ireland was common commercial benefit.

  2. Was the Enlightenment an attack on Christianity?

    an amorphous hybrid and a weak compromise[15] to restore man to his former glory. Diderot reiterates this belief: ?Deism had cut off a dozen heads from the Hydra of Religion, but that from the one head that had been spared, all the others would grow again.?[16] Thus far we can

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work