• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does John Reed's eye-witness account help the historian to understand the Russian Revolution?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

10) How does John Reed's eye-witness account help the historian to understand the Russian Revolution? While John Reed's eye-witness account of the Russian Revolution does offer the historian some insight, it presents more pitfalls and limitations than historical understanding. The book, Ten Days That Shook the World1does provide the historian with a "tableau" of the November Revolution (so named by Reed's calculation of the Gregorian calendar) but it fails to acknowledge much of the other "Revolutions" that led to this political uprising and thus largely disregards causality. There is a very limited time span covered in the book and so little is mentioned in regards to 1905, the July Days and the preceding demonstrations, and consequently there is little causative information. The account is also acutely restricted by the author, John Reed's, ideological and linguistic position which inhibits the accuracy of the document with, possibly unconscious, yet still inflammatory language. In addition, the geographically insulated nature of the book constrains the historian in gaining a broader vision of the November Revolution. The book however does have some positive aspects. These include a graphic account of the heavy propaganda bombardment experienced by the Russian people and the vastly disparate political views prevalent at the time. ...read more.

Middle

Hence, when the Bolshevik party mounted a call-to-arms the militancy of the workers was extremely advantageous. While Reed's account of the November Revolution, recognises the radicalization and politicization of the masses with its detailed record of the propaganda bombardment, it disregards the reasons for the propagandas success. Certainly the bombardment would not have been so successful had the rapid modernization16 of Russia not occurred. This industrialization for military gain required taxation which caused a strain on the economy; there was also an increase in literacy and wide-spread urbanization17. In this tense economic atmosphere the tide of discontent was able to swell. The concentration in urban areas such as Petrograd, and literacy of the malcontented workers made for a proliferation of revolutionary ideas and zeal. Thus modernization can be seen to be a major factor in the ability of the Bolshevik party to influence the masses, attain support and then ultimately political power. Reed's account however, does not scrutinize the aforementioned causality and hence limits the help this document may provide to the historian. This eye-witness account is also limited in its ability to help the historian to understand the Russian Revolution by the author, John Reed's ideological bearing. ...read more.

Conclusion

Thus in failing to recognise the contrasting party support due to the geographical constraints of the book, Ten Days That Shook the World can only provide the historian with a limited understanding of the Russian Revolution. John Reed's eye-witness account is useful to the historian in two related aspects. Firstly, the book presents the historian with a strong impression of the bombardment of propaganda experienced by the Russian people, particularly those living in the cities, during this period. And secondly the book highlights the vastly differing political views that were prevalent. The book includes many of the proclamations issued, speeches given and newspaper articles published, and in doing so demonstrates the constant stream of ideas and debate that were critical to the revolutionary movement. Thus, in these regards Ten Days That Shook the World is able to aid the historians' understanding of the Revolution. Although John Reed's eye-witness account of the November Revolution does have some positive aspects, these do not negate the overall problems the book presents. The limited time frame and lack of causative information combined with Reed's strong Communist sympathies and geographically inadequate examination mean that Ten Days That Shook the World is not sufficiently useful to the historians' understanding of the Russian Revolution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1700-1799 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1700-1799 essays

  1. Through examining the historians Georges Lefebvre and Alfred Cobban, what are the underlying factors ...

    dues and fees owed to the manorial lords and seigneurs of the aristocratic class. Lefebvre's interest in class mentality also influenced his approach and interpretation of primary documents, of which he perceived to be indispensable to historical scholarship, "No document, no history"6.

  2. Is the Cultural Revolution best characterised as a top-level power struggle or a mass ...

    Jiang Qing who did not become involved in politics until the early 1960s, had become 'disturbed by the "traditionalist" and "feudal" content of Chinese art. Her views clearly influenced those of Mao who became increasingly disturbed with the problems he found in all forms of art.

  1. The Bolsheviks did not seize power in October 1917, it fell into their hands

    'All Power to the Soviets!' convinced many workers, peasants and soldiers that Bolshevism was the only way to achieve the direct self-rule of the people they so wanted. Lenin thus declared class war, exacerbating the political polarization of the country between the common people and the privileged elite.

  2. “The French Revolution was simply a product of Enlightenment thought.” How accurate is this ...

    have the benefit of two centuries of revisionist scholarship to rely upon. Barruel especially was clearly writing to close to the actual event to gain any accurate perspective or grasp on the event. Clearly the period of time that has passed since the Revolution has enable historians to remove themselves personally from the events to gain a more objective viewpoint.

  1. Was the industrial Revolution a good thing?

    A variety of shows were on including singers, comedians, magicians and acrobats. The audience had great fun at the music halls and often joined in with the songs. One of the best-loved music hall singers was Marie Lloyd. Lots of musicians and singers were discovered through the music halls.

  2. American revolution

    designs of Administration against our Liberties, as we have never before allowed ourselves to entertain"9 However, the situation in the American colonies became particularly intense when the British Parliament passed the Coercive Acts in response to the Boston Tea Party.

  1. Why did Imperial Russia succumb to Revolution in 1917?

    Imperial Russia's experimentation with, as Alan Wood argues, quasi-constitutional", politics between 1905-1917, led to the formation of the State Duma and the State Council. Both were designed to install a semblance of democracy to decision making, however, the Duma was controlled entirely by the Tsar.

  2. It is true that Comrade Mao Tse-tung made gross mistakes during the 'Cultural Revolution', ...

    pass through the Marxian-defined "stages" of history in the most rapid possible fashion; The latter notion was to find its most extreme expression in Mao's celebration of the alleged Chinese virtues of being "poor and blank."( Meisner 2001) Meisner pointed that Perhaps the most distinguishing feature of the post-revolutionary Mao

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work