• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In 1990 his article Making Ethical Decisions, that appeared in his book American Business Values, Cavanagh speaks about utilitarianism and how it is the action that produces the greatest net good for all those who are affected by the action.

Free essay example:

                                                                                                                                                            Hudson, Pg.

                “Making Ethical Decisions”, By Gerald F. Cavanagh

        Cavanagh is a director of graduate programs in the University of Detroit’s College of Business Administration. He has degrees in engineering, philosophy, theology, and management. In 1990 his article “Making Ethical Decisions”, that appeared in his book American Business Values, Cavanagh speaks about utilitarianism and how it is the action that produces the greatest net good for all those who are affected by the action. Cavanagh goes on to speak about individual rights, giving examples such as the U.S. Bill of Rights and the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. He speaks about justice and how justice requires every human being to be guided by fairness, equity, and impartiality. I believe Cavanagh wants to inform business readers his opinions on making ethical judgments, since utilitarianism is the one business people feel closest to. For me this was an article that lacked information and examples of utilitarianism, individual rights, and justice. I believe he used pathos appeals for his readers, however, he lacked at presenting information and helping the reader understand the statement.  

        Utilitarianism originated from an ethical principle under Jeremy Bentham, who theorized an action is right if it produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Cavanaugh (2004) informs readers that utilitarianism is rarely possible to measure the costs and benefits. I found that utilitarianism is measured by hedons (which is positive), and dolors (which is negative). Hedons and dolors can be defined by pleasure, happiness, ideals, and preferences. You must calculate how many people will be affected, negatively (dolors) as well as positively (hedons). You then choose the action that produces the greatest overall amount of utility and subtract hedons from dolors or vice versa (Lawrence M. Hinman, 2010, p. 19). Cavanagh writes on how an individual should think before they do something. The challenge in utilitarianism is failing to completely know the outcome. It is understandable that one could not predict the future, but could only hold a probable guess. Cavanagh keeps his readers attention by writing metaphors or phrases the audience can connect to, for example, “The Golden Rule”, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” (Cavanagh, 2008, p. 236). With Individuals having to make choices on utilitarianism, they are protected by individual rights.  

        Cavanagh gives examples of Individual Rights, such as the U.S. Bill of Rights and the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Cavanagh failed at giving examples of what the U.S. Bill of Rights and the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights provides for individuals. Cavanagh speaks about how we have the freedom of conscience and freedom of speech, although, with every right there is a corresponding duty. With rights we have legal rights and consequences. With these consequences, Cavanagh failed to give supporting evidence or examples of what an individual can expect if one does something wrong. Cavanagh gave few examples of individual rights, one being, individuals getting paid for work corresponds to them doing their part and going into work. Cavanagh goes to the extreme writing people have the right not to be lied to or deceived (while this in my opinion is true), but occurs everyday to everyone. Cavanagh wants readers to understand that every action or decision we make is either justifiable or unjustifiable.

        Individuals throughout society have their own distinctive explanation of justice. Cavanagh writes that justice requires all persons to be guided by fairness, equity, and impartiality.  The standards of justice are more important than the utilitarian consideration of consequences. He speaks how justice is largely based on the moral rights of individuals, and is not as often in conflict with individual rights as are utilitarian norms. Cavanagh used pathos when he compared justice to the apartheid treatment of blacks in South Africa. However, he failed to explain what happened during the apartheid treatment of blacks in South Africa. When I think of justice I think of the criminal justice one faces when they commit a crime. There are always laws that can be broken and consequences that must follow.

        In Cavanagh’s article he is giving his opinion on utilitarianism, individual rights, justice, and how those should help individuals make decisions.

My understanding of the article is that people make decisions everyday that could have been different if thought through ethically. The details of the decisions will always be different from one person, and one group, to the next. An ethical decision should be made to promote the moral good of a group, and ideally all of humanity, without intentional or foreseeable harm to any other individuals or groups in the process. I believe Cavanagh is credible in writing an article such as this. I trust what Cavanagh states in his article, and even though there were a few statements I didn’t understand, he was still able to connect to me as a reader.

Cavanagh, G. (2008). Making ethical decisions. In L. Behrens & L. Rosen (Eds.),

        Writing and reading across the curriculum: (pp. 235-237). New York:

        Pearson Longman.

Utilitarianism. (2010). Lawrence M. Hinman.

        Retrieved July 11, 2010, from

http://ethics.sandiego.edu

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

(?)
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related University Degree Historical and Philosophical studies Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. 'Hospitality is generosity, unconditional love in action, rooted in Jesus' words and examples

    The rich man refused to share with his brother Lazarus (as we are all brothers in the eyes of God) and consequently, this act of inhospitality is duly rewarded. 'The rich man is condemned because Lazarus lives and dies in the absence of hospitality that could have saved him'(Paez, p.5).

  2. The Motives of Foreign Aid: Ethical or Rewarding?

    countries after World War II, with France being the first country to borrow from the International Monetary Fund in 1947. Now an organization with 187 countries, the International Monetary Fund is still a key component in securing global financial stability and the reduction of poverty.

  1. Examples of how fallacies can be used in argumentative writing.

    is clearly unacceptable. The information the arguer has given might feel relevant and might even get the audience to consider the conclusion-but the information isn't logically relevant, and so the argument is fallacious. Here's another example: "It's wrong to tax corporations-think of all the money they give to charity, and of the costs they already pay to run their businesses!"

  2. Knowing what ethics is and what makes up the study of ethics centers around ...

    Any flaw in our ethics will reduce our ability to be successful in our endeavors. If we are not ethical, we will meet many problems in our life. Since Ethic is part of judgment of a person and an organization, we should be ethical.

  1. Critically compare Act Utilitarianism with Rule Utilitarianism.

    He comments: "Our entanglements with people close to us erode simple self-interest. Husbands, wives, lovers, parents, children and friends all blur the boundaries of selfish concern (Glover 1990: 194)". This seems to run alongside the idea of following set rules as put forward by rule-utilitarianism, which would also not be creating utility.

  2. Where is the Common Good in Machiavellis Prince?

    D C Heath & Company, Boston, 1960 Hampsher-Monk, I. A History of Modern Political Thought. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, Oxford & Carlton, 1992 Machiavelli, N. The Discourses (5th edn.). Penguin Classics, London, 2003 Machiavelli, N. The Prince (trans. Constantine, P.) (2nd edn.). Vintage Classics, London, 2009 Morgenthau, H. (January 1945)

  1. Camus and Sartre: Principle vs. Pragmatism in Revolutionary Action

    In 1948 Sartre sought a break between the Capitalist elements in France and the PCF by helping to establish the Revolutionary Democratic Movement political party (Rassemblement d�mocratique r�volutionnaire or RDR). For his part, Camus took a less systemic approach through supporting autonomous trade unions and defending the politically oppressed.

  2. Universalism of Human Rights

    This allows for a state to approach human rights in their own way. For example, the right to a fair trial13 does not mean that all trials have to be carried out in the same way by the same system.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work