In the minds of Roman Catholics living in the North America, regardless of abortion being legalized, it is still viewed as a sin

Authors Avatar by selvatha (student)

                

ST. # 998170214

                                                                Selvathayabaran ,Tharrny

CHRISTIANITY, THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO GLOBALIZATION

PROFESSOR DAVID PERLEY

                                        November 25th 2011

In the globalized world today, Roman Catholics in North America are having a difficult time in finding a balance between the region where they reside and their own beliefs. The contestation over the reasons in which a woman maybe permitted to terminate a pregnancy has not lent itself into having a straightforward resolution. Religious opinions on the subject have further played an essential role. Regardless of religious adherence, abortion in the United States has been made legal in the earlier months of pregnancy, and with restrictions in later months based on privacy of rights. In the minds of Roman Catholics living in the North America, regardless of abortion being legalized, it is still viewed as a sin, because “from the moment of conception the embryo is a living person”  (Wassmar 3). Therefore killing a foetus, is considered murder in their view, and murder is a sin in accordance with the Ten Commandments. This religious viewpoint is present due to the internal religious artefact, the bible. According to Peter Beyer “ Religiousness might be broadly present in the consciousness of individuals, but it would have a great deal of difficulty having an real social effect”  (Beyer 98). In relation to this statement, in a secularized world not everyone accepts the bible. So to create an all-universal policy on the position of pro-life is problematic, this attempt by a subsystem (Beyer 98) to interfere causes tensions in other function systems. These systems include both the political and legal systems of Canada and the United States of America.

The United States has been noted for having a sophisticated judicial system.  In such a system, the view on abortion is as follows  “a woman, with her doctor, could choose abortion in earlier months of pregnancy without legal restriction, and with restrictions in later months, based on the right to privacy” (Roy 343).  This legal precedent was defined in the case of Roe v. Wade, where a single pregnant woman, Roe wanted to abort her child, but was unable to do so due to the laws imposed in Texas. Roe felt as if her lawful rights were being taken away from her so Roe decided to challenge the constitution due to this injustice. However, a married couple (Wade) with no children attacked the laws and argued against Roe because they believed that she did not have the right to expel the child. The Wades argument was based on the following quote:  “the future possibilities of contraceptive failure, pregnancy, unpreparedness for parenthood, and impairment of the wife's health.” The legalization of abortion occurred because of the existing rights women had to life and liberty.  This right is found in the fourteenth amendment, in the US constitution.   The constitution states the following

Join now!

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

In evaluating the fourteenth amendment in the American Constitution it can clearly be distinguished that persons cannot be deprived ...

This is a preview of the whole essay