• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Influences that led to change within the system of nations in the period 1815-1914.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Influences that led to change within the system of nations in the period 1815-1914. Kevin L. Boyd Norwich University Abstract The world faced drastic changes during the period of 1815-1914 with many nations entering the industrial revolution, fighting the first modern wars, and revolutionized agricultural practices taking hold. The period that I am looking at in this paper began with the Congress of Vienna from September of 1814 until June of 1815, where the nations allied against France dictated their terms and in doing so changed the way diplomacy was conducted. This period saw the era of Pax Britannica, which was the expansion of the British Empire into all corners of the globe. Several modern European nation-states unified into the modern nations of Germany, Italy, and Austro-Hungary. Democratization took hold in most continental European nations, and vast majorities of the population began to migrate to cities leading to nation-states becoming more urbanized. The United States of America fought a terrible civil war that affected Europe both in trade and in ideals. And finally this period ends with the clouds of war gathering over Europe for a conflict unlike any the world has ever seen before. I will look at the resulting changes, whether they could have been sustained, and the consequences of the changes. Keywords: Industrial Revolution, Congress of Vienna, diplomacy, democratization Influences that led to change within the system of nations in the period 1815-1914. ...read more.

Middle

674). The only regional power that did not participate in the Congresses of Europe was the Ottoman Empire most likely because they were seen as outsiders and they were not necessarily excluded but chose not to participate. I believe that this has a lasting effect to this day as the modern nation of Turkey that has resulted from the fall of the Ottoman Empire is still struggling to get included into European politics and the European Union (Migdalovitz, 2010, p. 26). However the British Empire, which was also outside of continental Europe did participate and in fact utilized the congresses to further their own interests with Pax Britannica. The term Pax Britannica is Latin for "The British Peace" and is used to define the timeframe that we are studying (1815-1914) which was a period of relative peace in Europe, the term 'relative' being key here. Britain controlled most of the key maritime trade routes and was the ruler of the seas without any significant naval challenger during this time. The term also applies to the spread of British imperialism after Napoleon's defeat in the Battle of Waterloo (Pugh, 1999, p. 83). While there was no major outbreak of hostilities for Britain until the Crimean War in 1854, there were several conflicts notably in Canada in 1837 during the Patriot War Rebellion (Greer, 1996), 1838 saw the beginning of the First Afghan War (Waller, 1993) ...read more.

Conclusion

Conclusion The foreign policy of the many states in the world from the period between 1815 and 1914, resulted in Pax Britannica for Britain but not necessarily for the remainder of the world. While continental Europe was constantly beset by wars and revolutions, and the US fought a devastating civil war, most of the world was colonized by the western European nations or fought to get out from under a colonial yoke during this time. The policy of colonizing anyone and everyone was a failure in diplomacy, and actually of humanity or common decency, and if this policy remained today we would continue to see wide-spread revolution. While the world had its' bloodiest century in the 20th century, I believe that it would have been much bloodier had we still had the same worldview that led nations to colonize. Colonization was a world-view that developed due to racism, social-darwinism, and a lack of diplomacy. The diplomacy during this period was instituted to keep monarchies in power, and nationalism as well as the common people down, and therefore was doomed to fail. People became more educated as a result of the industrial revolution, and therefore more aware of who they were and their place in the world. They wanted more for themselves, and a greater say in their governance. Therefore diplomacy as did the rest of the world changed at a rapid pace during the 19th and 20th centuries. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1800-1899 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1800-1899 essays

  1. What was the significance of the Paris Commune of 1871?

    Thirdly it is important to note that while public opinion and meetings were reprised during the majority of the Second Empire, the Liberalization of the late 1860's opened the floodgates of public frustration. Napoleon III sought to gradually liberalize France by permitting cultural discussions but steering the working class away from political solutions (Schafer p.20).

  2. Book Review The Scramble For Africa, M.E Chamberlain.

    . . psychologically the two cultures had moved very far apart, the more so because of the great stress nineteenth century Europeans were prone to put on technological advance.

  1. "Discuss the aims of the Congress of Vienna and the Consequences it had on ...

    They also wanted to see the return of the monarchy in France. France got the return of the monarchy and was not several punished. They also got back some colonies such as Guadeloupe from Sweden, and the isle of bourdon from Britain.

  2. Colonial Australia: History of convicts

    The courts didn't have a better system then. It should be noted here that at that point in time five shillings or fifty cents was the line between the Judge's verdict to hang a convicted felon or their transportations. Crimes of violence were hanging offences. Most convicts were petty thieves.

  1. Comparing economic change in Britain and China from 1760 to 1914

    Secondly, since the high commodity tax 'depressed domestic purchasing power' and reduced sellers profit, businessmen was forced to export their commodities to foreign markets. (ibid) this phenomenon boosted the international trade and stimulated the economy to a deep extent.

  2. The Development of the Telegraph and its Social Impact

    The fact that the telegrams could be sent on a timely basis was significant. As can be seen in Figure 1, there was steady growth in the number of telegrams from 1867 through about 1893, when the telephone began to be used more.

  1. It didnt happen here. Why didnt socialism prosper in the USA in the period ...

    While of course in reality this was often not the case, (for example the Jim Crow Laws 1876>) [19], in terms of democratic freedom and the potential for social and economic mobility, a 19th century working class American was in a better position than his European counterparts.

  2. Why did Britain industrialise earlier than Germany?

    The result was the development of the first forms of mechanised agriculture with mechanisation being a key factor for the initiation for the agricultural revolution. New machines such as Jethro Tull?s seed drill, (1701) a tool that dispersed seeds across a field and Andrew Meikle?s threshing machine of 1786 made large numbers of manual farm labourers redundant.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work