• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Napoleon - Son of the Revolution ?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Son of the Revolution ? Fraser McBain I have chosen to answer essay question 3 on page 121. There are many different views on Napoleon. He is said to be the son of the Revolution, a just man who upheld the Revolution's policies and maintained its ideals. He is also accused of being a traitor, who betrayed the Revolution and returned France to the oppressive way of life that the people suffered under the "Ancien Regime". I think that Napoleon is best described as being a bridge between the old and the new. He succeeded in blending new ideals as well as old traditions, and brought together the best of both worlds. Napoleon had a very metamorphic relationship with the Revolution. In the beginning of his military career he claimed to be the "son of the Revolution". He swore to be a patriot and a passionate supporter of all that the Revolutionary Republic stood for. ...read more.

Middle

He reassured the people that this new constitution was based upon true principles of representative government and on the sacred rights of property, liberty and equality. He swore these powers would be strong and ever lasting. This reform shows that he did not exactly support and safeguard the revolution, but he reformed France. Throughout his whole career he was the prince of liberties. In 1816, he declared himself to be the protagonist of the Revolution, charging the French people to respect liberty, and above all equality. He deemed it possible to restrain liberty in extreme cases, but he is quoted as having said, "Heaven forbid that we ever infringe on equality". In this respect, Napoleon truly was the son of the Revolution. Yet he countered his revolutionary actions with seemingly monarchist or royalist actions. In 1804 he crowned himself emporer, thus reestablishing the oppressive system of governing that had lead to the revolution. ...read more.

Conclusion

These bodies made up a council, and it was this council all major, central and local government officials and initiated all legislation. In creating his new system of governement, Napoleon assured his control over French politics, as it appeared to be democratic as the Revolution's Republic had been, yet power was not evenly or justly separate, and certain bodies such as the tribunate were created merely for the purpose of democratic appearance. In conclusion to the question "As heir to the Revolution, did Napoleon safeguard its gains for France?", I would have to say, that Napoleon was neither a true son of the Revolution or a traitor who plunged France back into darkness and oppression. He can be accurately defined as a great military leader who merely combined old and new ways of living and thinking in order to form the most suitable governing body that he could, for love of his country. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Medieval History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Medieval History essays

  1. medieval women-wealth or love?

    Love often did not develop throughout some marriages, however sometimes some sort of friendship or close bond was formed. Marriages were frequently arranged so that both families involved would benefit. Marriages would be arranged to bring prestige or wealth to the family.

  2. To what extent did a new concept of

    It was Petrarch who virtually rediscovered which was virtually unknown in the West. The Medieval Church had endorsed Scholasticism, which became the dominant philosophical tradition of Western Christendom during the medieval era. The rise of Humanism ended the Church's monopoly on learning.

  1. The search for the sublime life.

    It is easy to see why knights were often elevated to a nearly Christ-like position, and even today every man wants to be a knight and every woman wants a knight on a white horse. Our views of chivalry and Because life in the noble court was hardly heroic or

  2. Industrial and Agricultural Revolution.

    After this happens the entire social structure is changed and the community can often end up worse than it was before the revolution began. Plato defined a revolution as; Any attempt by subordinate groups through the use of violence to bring about; 1) A change of government or its policy.

  1. The Jewish-conspiracy theory of the Bolshevik revolution.

    While pointing out that Zionism and Bolshevism are competing for the soul of the Jewish people, Churchill (in 1920) was preoccupied with the role of the Jew in the Bolshevik Revolution and the existence of a worldwide Jewish conspiracy. Another well-known author in the 1920s, Henry Wickham Steed describes in the second volume of his Through 30 Years 1892-1922 (p.

  2. English Property Rights vs. French Peasant Farming & Productivity

    The enclosure movement in England, especially the post 1750 Parliamentary Enclosure movement allowed now redundant rural labour to move into urban areas to power the industrial revolution. The agricultural revolution was a prerequisite for the industrial revolution. Traditionally it has been argued that France's failure to match England's agricultural productivity,

  1. What is the relationship between Revolutions and International Relations?

    and focus on the reasons why previously stable forms of social order break down, broadly identifying the international dimension of each case. Finally, the third school Halliday talks about is derived from macro-historical and structural concepts allowing a much greater recognition of the role of the international system and its factors as causes of Revolution.

  2. "The Taipings Uprising was a rebellion rather than a revolution" - Do you agree ...

    There were strict rules regarding the mode of living of the army. The members of the army were loyal, cooperative to the leaders and fought to their best. There were also good strategies and plans for the Taipings. They attack the Southern part of China where it was the weakest

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work