• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Not an age of reason, but a revolt against rationalism. (Peter Gay) Discuss this characterisation of the Enlightenment.

Extracts from this document...


Not an age of reason, but a revolt against rationalism. (Peter Gay) Discuss this characterisation of the Enlightenment. There is a carving by Giovanni Lapi that depicts Justice rejecting the death penalty1, this is a simple characterisation of the Enlightenment, taking one of its many aspects and displaying it in a plain form. The Enlightenment, which can, for argument's sake, be given the epoch of 1750-1800, is the movement that helped to change the outlook humans have on the world. Peter Gay asserts that the movement was spurned from the dissatisfaction contemporaries had with the previous period of intellectual thought: rationalism. The quest here is to discover what the Enlightenment was, and whether or not it was a movement bent on the rejection of rationalism. Benedictus Spinoza is a prime example of a rationalist, writing most of his works in the 1660s and 1670s. His book Ethics, Demonstrated in the Fashion of Geometry was so titled because he lay out his argument in the form of a mathematical proof, typical of the Rationalists. Rationalism was essentially an attempt to clarify the confusion that was brewing over the question of Christianity, and this was attempted via pure thought. ...read more.


The Enlightenment certainly was not purely and ideological and spiritual movement, it was the first intellectual movement to capture the imagination of society as a whole. "Indeed it may be helpful to see the Enlightenment as precisely that point in European history when... the secular intelligentsia emerged a relatively independent social force."3 The most important point in Porter's statement, is that these people were a 'social force', this meant they were influencing society through their teachings, writings and ideas. The phrase Enlightened Absolutism was coined not by eighteenth century scholars, but by modern historians who decided that the domestic reforms required after the wars in Europe coincided conveniently with the plethora of absolute rulers at the time. The Enlightenment saw the concept of patrimonial and legal despotism as the most desirable form of rule as it was the most reasonable. The idea of and Enlightened despot or absolutist is somewhat flawed, in as much as it is very difficult to find a ruler who both deemed himself to be part of the Enlightenment and believed in the fundamentals of the movement, such as faith in science. ...read more.


The fact remains that the age with which the Enlightenment is associated, that is 1750-1800, was without doubt an age of reason. From Bayle to Berkely, the enlightened individuals were putting their faith in science and their senses to discover answers about the world. Rationalists had done the same, but put their faith in their mind and thoughts instead of senses. Both groups were striving away from the irrationality of the Church, searching for a feasible explanation for human existence, which the Church could not provide. It took millions of years for man to discover reason, for it to take a further fifty or one hundred to discover a different kind of reason, does not amount to revolt. It is my belief that for the Enlightenment to reach its conclusions, the existence of Rationalism was necessary to inspire further thought. Similarly, it is my belief that the Christianity's existence was paramount to the emergence of Rationalist thought. None of these things are a revolt against the other, but an augmentation of their ideas. The revolt against rationalism cannot replace the age of reason, for they are one and the same thing. For mankind to be at the intellectual point we are in the twenty-first century, it was necessary for the Enlightenists to be reasonable in their search for an alternative path to rationalism. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Buddhism section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Buddhism essays

  1. Summarise and discuss the origin and development of Mahayana Buddhism.

    Buddhahood, and this is what is referred to as Nirvana.18 This self existent body, or emptiness in reality is all that exists. All the other levels of the Buddhas nature are used as aids to assistance humanity gain this awareness of emptiness.

  2. What were the main characteristics of the Enlightenment?

    Considering its liberal content many of the Enlightenment thinkers tried to develop it and forward it to people belonging in the Third Estate (people without power), hence to understand how far they were exploited by the clergy and the authority.

  1. Choderlos de Laclos: Les Liaisons Dangereuses - In what ways may "Les Liaisons Dangereuses" ...

    the spectrum with Valmont blaspheming that he shall carry away his intended victim (Presidente de Tourvel) "from her God". It is to possible to explain the libertine actions of the Marquise and the Vicomte by suggesting that it is a lack of these morals and traditional values that spurred them on to so ruthlessly pursue their goals.

  2. The Enlightenment was an intellectual movement in the Western world

    for humanity, instead of a violent disorder of an unstable environment among the human race. Hobbes thought of himself as a scientist. He wanted to make a scientific model of politics like the model of the Universe created by the Italian astronomer Galileo.

  1. What is meant by the phrase 'The normative content of modernity'? Is it a ...

    This issue which Rousseau confronted most of his life is summed up in the first sentence of his most famous work, The Social Contract: "Man is born free but everywhere in chains." (Rousseau (1762), 1973: 165). At the foundation of his thought on government and authority is the idea

  2. The Philosophy of Zen and Shin Buddhism

    Higher Learnings and other practices, such as chanting and meditation, making these teachings and practices more understandable and easier for ordinary people (de Bary, 334). Shin has nothing to do with believing in a deity or God for salvation or blindly following a creed, teaching or guru.

  1. Nagarjuna was a great contributor to the Mahayana tradition.

    What Zen proffers is to go beyond intellect and see the solution through direct experience. If one foregoes intellect and the dualist way of reasoning through direct experience, it is realized that the unceasing struggle between the infinite and finite never existed.

  2. Religion is both a problemwhere its structures of dominance have oppressed women, as ...

    Considering the teachings of Christianity, now more rights and privileges have been given to women. Compared to women in other religions, Christianity has given more liberty and freedom to the women. Thus, women in Christianity lead a liberal life and are able to practice their freedom.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work