• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the arguments for and against life after death?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline the arguments for and against life after death? Questions of life after death have intrigued the dawn of mankind for millennia. This is one of the fundamental questions that none of us escapes. At some point in every person's life, they must come to grips with a universal principle - all living things inevitably will die. Even in the brilliant and celebratory moment of our conception, we are already cloaked in the mantle of bodily death, and we know it. Although much in life has changed over the centuries, when it comes to death and what happens after, we are little different than our ancestors. Although modern medicine keeps many of us alive longer, death inevitably holds away. Then like previous generations, we find ourselves face to face with that which we cannot control or understand. Most people do believe that there is some type of existence after the physical body is gone, and one good explanation for this is that there is no compelling reason not to believe it. What would be the point of going through this sometimes very hard life if we were just going to be reduced to dust after all is said and done? Whatever we believe about death (and what happens after death), its inescapable nature is not in debate. But knowing that death is a universal requirement does not end our predicament - it only pushes our need to understand what life is all about, what its purpose is. Life after death has been generally categorised 2 ways dualism and monism. Dualism is believed mainly in religions such as Islam. ...read more.

Middle

It decide which past lives to pull into this one, it decides the lessons and karmic events it will work on, it can make an agreement with another soul(s) to join together in this coming life to resolve personal karma. All these issues are defined in a Master Plan (like a blue print) for this coming life. In the Hindu and Buddhist tradition the view is held that we have lived many lives before and that, on death, we will be reborn again. The conditions of our present lives are believed to be a direct consequence of our previous lives. Arguments for dualism Dualism has received a lot of attention in the past and Descartes has not been the only philosopher who has written on dualism. Great names such as Plato, Aristotle and Aquinas have all put forward their ideas on the subject each one differing slightly. Plato believed that the soul belonged to a level of reality that was higher of that of the body. He stated that the soul was immortal and this derived from his theory of ideas, which he called forms. For every existence there is a perfect idea/form: For every man there is an ideal man for every dog there is an ideal dog. A major argument in support for Dualism is the Argument from Religion. This argument comes from the ideas of ones religious belifs, which usually have a strong emphasis on the immortality of the soul. Another popular argument in support of Dualism is known as the, "arguments from Irreducibility", this argument simply supports the idea that thee is no physical explanation for things. ...read more.

Conclusion

The, "replica theory", states that if you were to die now, and were then recreated with the same memories and physical body in a different place on, Australia perhaps, rather than Britain you would not long doubt that it was the same you, even when you flew back to the UK to attend your own funeral. Similarly, if God were to re-create you in heaven after my death, as "a psycho-physical", being, (I.e. one with both a mind and body) This thesis has been one of the most intensely discussed theories of life after death put forward in our time. One criticism to resurrection, which was raised in the time of the church fathers and is still raised today, is , "what if a Christian dies at sea and his body is eaten by various sea creatures, who then scatter to the seven seas? How can God possibly resurrect that Christian? What the father typically did in response to this objection was to appeal to the divine nature. No human being would be able to locate and reconstitute the relevant atoms of the Christians body, but an all knowing and all powerful God could. Gods only problem is to locate, collect, and reassemble them, the church fathers were surly right. Such a being could do that. Arguments for monism These arguments will centre on physcalism. We as humans are just physical entities. We begin as a genetically programmed, monocular organisation of molecules. Development leads to behaviour controlling. Monism is the view that there is only one kind of, "stuff". This gives us two possibilities 1) All stuff is a physical stuff a position knows as physicalism. 2) All stuff is a mental stuff a position known as idealism. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3/5

Aside from the fact that this essay stops abruptly just as it introduces monism, the standard is generally not bad.

To its credit, the essay covers a lot of diverse points drawing from a variety of thinkers and presents these, for the most part, accurately. The essay would be improved by including a clear structure. When writing under a title like "Outline the arguments for and against life after death" there is less need for a clear conclusion or argument, but there is still merit in setting out clearly what one is going to say, and trying to have something to say about the arguments in general, rather than just presenting a scattering of different views.

As it stands, the essay focuses exclusively on the division between monistic and dualistic ideas of life after death. This would be fine were the distinction clearly explained (just with some simple definitions at the beginning) and were it clear why this related to the task at hand. Instead, the essay seems like an essay on monism versus dualism, rather than an essay about arguments for life after death.

Though the essay title asks only for an 'outline' of the arguments for and against, the best marks will only be gained if some awareness is shown of the merits or demerits, of the arguments discussed. Also, as noted, the opening section which simply waxes lyrical about life and death can definitely be removed without subtracting anything important from the essay.

Marked by teacher David Moss 31/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. God Of Small Things - Significance of the title.

    Neither Ammu nor Velutha have no future, they both belong to lower classes, they are not respected in the society class they live in. Velutha is a Paravan. Chacko, seeking to put Ammu down, mistakenly uses the term for a whole social class instead of for an individual by saying "spoken like a bourgeoisie.

  2. Waiting for Godot - Meaningless of Life

    All these actions are routine, meaningless and unconscious. It is suggested that our daily life is just repetitive, every day is the same, they are doing the same things, that is why life is meaningless. Vladimir and Estragon are actually trapped and tied, because "there is nothing force them to stay but there's no incentive to make them go."

  1. "Pilgrimage is just an excuse for a holiday!"

    Where the pilgrimage is placed is vital to the overall effect. The holy place is very important to the particular person as it holds historical tales and landmarks within them, this is a strong reason as some monuments bear great emphasis on happenings told in the religion's holy book.

  2. Plato and Descartes. In the works we studied by Plato (Apology, The Idea of ...

    Plato believes the way to obtain knowledge is not based upon understanding a thing, but by understanding the idea of the thing. Plato perceives that knowledge is what is certain and opinion is what is questionable. This is where we can see a connection between Plato and Descartes.

  1. In this paper, I am going to compare and contrast Hume's empiricism to Descartes' ...

    the operations of nature; where similar objects are constantly conjoined together, and the mind is determined by custom to infer the one form the appearance of the other "(Hume, 55) We infer that the sun will rise tomorrow because we have observed that it has been rising for the past billion years.

  2. Discuss Forster's presentation of religion in "A Passage to India".

    This is exemplified by the narrator's description of each culture's different responses to poetry: "They listened delighted, for they took the public view of poetry, not the private which obtains in England. It never bored them to hear words, words: they breathed them with the cool night air, never stopping to analyse..."

  1. What is the strongest objection to utilitarianism? How persuasive is this objection?

    Furthermore, the theory suggests that it is acceptable for some individuals to feel pain and sacrifice their happiness for the majority wellbeing, which many would see as incoherent, as it then leads to difficult questions of who should be the ones to suffer and why.

  2. Essay on MLK's Letter from Birmingham Jail for Philosophy Class

    He first refers to eighth century prophets who left their villages to speak God's word. He also speaks of Paul, and how he carried the Gospel to all of the Greco-Roman world. By using these analogies, King is strengthening his case by establishing similarities between it and previous, acceptable cases of moral acts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work