• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Philosopher comparison chart

Extracts from this document...


THINKER Burke Marx MLK Malcolm X De Gouges WollstoneCraft Mill CLASSIFICATION Conservative Socialist Radical Radical Liberal Liberal Liberal HISTORICAL TIME PERIOD 18th century 19th century 20th century 20th century 18th century 18th century 19th century HISTORICAL CONTEXT -French Revolution -End of enlightenment - Books: "reflections on the revolution in Fr" -England -Industrial Revolution -Rise of factories -Decline of agrarian economy -Class divisions between owners of factories (bourgeoisie) and wage earners (proletariat) -American civil rights movement -letter from Birmingham jail - reasons for why this happened in 1950s: 1. migration of blacks country --> city 2. WWII against racism 3. TV showed the reality of the situation Same as MLK Besides his work is called -The ballet or the bullet - her book: Declaration the Rights of Women and Citizens -reasons for why it happened now: -Spirit of the age econ dev. Indust rev. (rise of factories) no sexual division of labor -right after fr. ...read more.


-christ notion of universal love -non-violent resistance -all Christians, black and white are capable of universal love - -separatist (races have to be separate) -emphasizes that blacks can do civil rights movement themselves -All humans, whether men or women are rational -Reject ideas of previous thinkers that women are weak by nature (intellectually) -there is an inequality physically, but not mentally -All humans, whether men or women are rational -Reject ideas of previous thinkers that women are weak by nature (intellectually) -there is an inequality physically, but not mentally -idea of women being mentally weak comes from socialization, not from actual truth -ppl have natural rights -discusses issue of authenticity -all human beings are rational but we are also fallible (386) PURPOSE OF STATE -keep order -restrain and suppress individual passion because people are irrational -basis of government not based on abstract ideas, metaphysical rights but on experience of past (353) ...read more.


women -both sexes can rule -to have legitimacy, the govt must include the people -popular sovereignty--> the people decide who should rule--> monarchs, nobles + clergy are agents of tyranny -mill supports limited democracy with safeguards that prevent the majority from infringing on nights of minority (379-380) INDIVIDUAL VS. COMMUNITY -people do not have natural rights --> do not exist -natural rights are abstract ideas made by intellectuals -people cannot choose gov. -community over individual -community has a sense of history -community: favors the happiness and equality of the community over individual wealth and happiness -individual rights of women and men should be the same -women educated -individual rights of women--> some rights as men -women educated -community--> everyone should have free education where both sexes have education together -support for individual rights -harm principle --> the community can only infringe upon the individuals rights if the individual causes physical or economic harm -sanctity of the individual-no one can tell the individual what to do-but you can argue and persuade him ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. Universalism of Human Rights

    and the actual law of a state is deeply founded and highly influential on the given culture. An example of this is Islamic law that allows for the right hand to be chopped off a thief, which is a human rights violation.

  2. Women in Plato's Republic - The Women of an Ideal State

    Philosophy and Public Affairs. (1997) Online. 14 October 2004. <http://www.jstor.org.proxy.lib.uwo.ca> pg. 345 10 Plato. Republic (Grube/Reeve Translation). Indianapolis, United States of America: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 1992. (454d) 11 Nettleship, Richard Lewis. Lectures on the Republic of Plato. London, England: Macmillan, 1901. pg 34 12 Plato.

  1. Camus and Sartre: Principle vs. Pragmatism in Revolutionary Action

    and - using very deliberate language - referred to Jeanson as his "collaborator" asserting that Jeanson "[made] a travesty of the book he [set] out to criticize;" Camus' reaction, exhibited his belief that "the collaborator" was more interested in defending communism than in sincerely considering the his ideas (Camus qtd.

  2. So why History of Ideas?

    The philosophical version of a 'grind school'. As I consider the 'accuracy' of these theories, I'm quite glad that eventually philosophers concerned only with our surroundings went out of fashion, as who knows what they might have come up with next (everything is made of marble, perhaps?).

  1. The Role of Women in the Church.

    Woman was made from man (1 Cor 11:8) This argument is used to defend the principle of male headship with an order of headship running God -> Christ -> Man -> woman. See further discussion under the N.T. verse. 2)

  2. Existentialism - a philosophical movement that developed during the 19th and 20th centuries

    In other words, first you exist, and then the individual emerges as life decisions are made. Freedom of choice, through which each human being creates their own nature, is one of the basic themes. Because individuals are free to choose their own path, existentialists have argued that they must accept the risk and responsibility of their actions.

  1. Essay on MLK's Letter from Birmingham Jail for Philosophy Class

    King references Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, who lived to a higher moral law and refused to compromise to lower standards, even if the consequences included death. They were endangered because of their unwavering faith and adherence to the truth, much like King.

  2. Egalitarianism accentuates inequality

    I would argue that any form of egalitarianism is an excuse for laziness and irresponsibility. It wants to convince people that they are not responsible for their outcomes, that if anything goes wrong in their lives it is somebody else?s fault.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work