• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Philosopher comparison chart

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

THINKER Burke Marx MLK Malcolm X De Gouges WollstoneCraft Mill CLASSIFICATION Conservative Socialist Radical Radical Liberal Liberal Liberal HISTORICAL TIME PERIOD 18th century 19th century 20th century 20th century 18th century 18th century 19th century HISTORICAL CONTEXT -French Revolution -End of enlightenment - Books: "reflections on the revolution in Fr" -England -Industrial Revolution -Rise of factories -Decline of agrarian economy -Class divisions between owners of factories (bourgeoisie) and wage earners (proletariat) -American civil rights movement -letter from Birmingham jail - reasons for why this happened in 1950s: 1. migration of blacks country --> city 2. WWII against racism 3. TV showed the reality of the situation Same as MLK Besides his work is called -The ballet or the bullet - her book: Declaration the Rights of Women and Citizens -reasons for why it happened now: -Spirit of the age econ dev. Indust rev. (rise of factories) no sexual division of labor -right after fr. ...read more.

Middle

-christ notion of universal love -non-violent resistance -all Christians, black and white are capable of universal love - -separatist (races have to be separate) -emphasizes that blacks can do civil rights movement themselves -All humans, whether men or women are rational -Reject ideas of previous thinkers that women are weak by nature (intellectually) -there is an inequality physically, but not mentally -All humans, whether men or women are rational -Reject ideas of previous thinkers that women are weak by nature (intellectually) -there is an inequality physically, but not mentally -idea of women being mentally weak comes from socialization, not from actual truth -ppl have natural rights -discusses issue of authenticity -all human beings are rational but we are also fallible (386) PURPOSE OF STATE -keep order -restrain and suppress individual passion because people are irrational -basis of government not based on abstract ideas, metaphysical rights but on experience of past (353) ...read more.

Conclusion

women -both sexes can rule -to have legitimacy, the govt must include the people -popular sovereignty--> the people decide who should rule--> monarchs, nobles + clergy are agents of tyranny -mill supports limited democracy with safeguards that prevent the majority from infringing on nights of minority (379-380) INDIVIDUAL VS. COMMUNITY -people do not have natural rights --> do not exist -natural rights are abstract ideas made by intellectuals -people cannot choose gov. -community over individual -community has a sense of history -community: favors the happiness and equality of the community over individual wealth and happiness -individual rights of women and men should be the same -women educated -individual rights of women--> some rights as men -women educated -community--> everyone should have free education where both sexes have education together -support for individual rights -harm principle --> the community can only infringe upon the individuals rights if the individual causes physical or economic harm -sanctity of the individual-no one can tell the individual what to do-but you can argue and persuade him ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. Descartes' classification of thoughts.

    Even if Descartes grants that external objects cause these adventitious ideas, there is no reason to believe that the idea he has perfectly resembles or corresponds to the external object. For example, Descartes has two quite different ideas of the sun.

  2. Philosophy - Panpsychism vs Emergentism

    James initially introduces the idea of giving a word to each of twelve men from a single sentence, and have them stand together, while letting each continue thinking of his word. James postulates that this would not give rise to any sort of consciousness; however, given there were one hundred

  1. Looking at the Babylon's Society during Hummurabi's regime by analyzing the Code of Hammurabi.

    If it kill a slave of the owner, then he shall pay slave for slave to the owner of the house. 232. If it ruin goods, he shall make compensation for all that has been ruined, and inasmuch as he did not construct properly this house which he built

  2. Camus and Sartre: Principle vs. Pragmatism in Revolutionary Action

    Sartre believed that human freedom existed as "a project that lights our way and gives its meaning" to our historically situated existence; he thought Camus' absolute moralism operated outside of this structure and represented and estrangement to the realities of existential life (65).

  1. Plato's Republic vs. Locke's 'A letter concerning toleration'

    Achilles, as it turns out, becomes the ideal disobedient subject, fueled by anger. By changing the outlook on death and how people talk and write about it, therefore, Socrates aims to limit the spiritedness in the good city. (Plato, 411 a-c).

  2. Universalism of Human Rights

    These institutions are meant to be seen as bodies moving towards universalism but instead they are considered as western institutions that are imposing their views on the rest of the world. But, as the world is still in the process of globalisation, then the shift towards universalism isn't complete.

  1. Religion and Resistance in the Nazi Regime

    In a speech to the Gauleiters at Nuremberg on September 12, 1938, Hitler's deputy fuehrer Rudolf Hess promised that the government would stay out of church affairs. The purpose of the speech was to make the government seem benign so as to gain support for National Socialism from potential silent

  2. Has anyone proved to your satisfaction that induction is rational or that it is ...

    arguments are based on the supposition of that resemblance' (Section IV, Part II). The problem of the validity or rationality of judgements about future events arises because such judgements are 'neither reports of experience nor logical consequences of it' (Nelson Goodman; The New Riddle of Induction 1955).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work