• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Reasons for and against the view that morality is independent of religion.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Reasons for and against the view that morality is independent of religion Cupitt's starting point for ethics today begins with what he considers to be the cultural condition of our time and that is the rejection of the old 'realist' notion of God. * With the advent of non-realism notions of absolute truths have been rejected to be replaced by a solely human understanding of the world and God. * In terms of ethics this means there is no longer any God giving us a moral code and as such no moral absolutes independent of human experience. * Morality is now decided by humans with the context of different human communities. Cupitt argues that the traditional Christian view of God is repressive. Such a God has set out 'in the heavens' what is considered to be right and wrong behaviour in the world. For Cupitt, an objective God implies submission (or lack of freedom). Cupitt believes society has now embraced non-realism as such he believes it is no longer bound to follow realist forms of religious belief and ethics. ...read more.

Middle

Socrates asked. "Do gods love holiness and morality because they are holy, or is morality holy because the gods love it?" Put simply: if an existing god says something is good because he sees that something objectively is good, then the goodness of that thing is intrinsic in that thing; the good is independent of the god. In other words, if the god recognises that murder is wrong, then the wrongful act of killing is wrong even if the god doesn't see that. Morality or immorality in any action is not dependent on the god; god's will is determined by what he sees, not the other way round. God no more invented morality than Newton invented gravity. Imagine you're God. Make a world where circles have corners and two and two make five. If there are laws of physics that put finite conditions on God, then maybe there are moral restraints and restrictions on his alleged omnipotence and supposedly infinite power. Christian moralists can't accept this. It says that there are things that God simply cannot do. ...read more.

Conclusion

Philosophers call this natural process the "Social Contract". Selfish immorality is taking without giving back to the contract. Morality in society depends on equality in the contract - democratic public access. This can be achieved only through human rights education and legal procedural reform. We mustn't judge human action from pulpits or confessionals but through the courtroom, public votes and a non-secret media society. The best moralists are human rights activists. Many people do not yet get involved in social interaction and having a very poor part of the social contract. Many are blinkered by religions into thinking that their misery is a punishment from a god who will give everyone his final judgement after the last trump. Such believers forget to judge for themselves; they have no sense of government by the people for the people; they are governed by blind dogma. Their sense of morality is what someone else tells them to do. But morality isn't not killing, it's knowing why you shouldn't kill, and that requires real personal wisdom. Top of the school education syllabus agenda shouldn't be RE but social interaction skills. Morality can survive: for that to happen, we as humanists and humanitarians need to relearn how to negotiate the social contract. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. 'Dr. Faustus is a morality play without a moral.' Discuss.Let us first deal with ...

    Faustus' final soliloquy makes it clear that the play is more concerned with one man's tragedy than offering a moral to the masses, O Faustus Now hast thou but one bare hour to live And then thou must be damned perpetually.

  2. Outline the view that there are no rights and wrongs in sexual ethics:To what ...

    Here, we can see the key to the biblical understanding of marriage. The sexual union between a man and a woman in marriage is not just physical and biological, but emotional, psychological, spiritual and social. Our whole beings are united in marriage and sexual intercourse is not just a physical response to a physical desire.

  1. Consider in depth the different forms of religious language and evaluate how far they ...

    We can describe 'literal' things (things inside our world) but not non-literal beings such as God. Ayer would therefore agree with the claim tat all talk about religion is meaningless as it cannot be verified empirically (by the senses). The falsification principle was developed by Flew. He postulated that God suffers 'death by a thousand qualifications'.

  2. Outline the reasons why it may be claimed that religion and morality are linked. ...

    Newman says that to follow the conscience is to follow a divine law, as it is a messenger from God. Kant argued that there was only one undisputed fact in the universe. This fact was that a moral law existed, and that without God, it would be meaningless.

  1. Looking at the Babylon's Society during Hummurabi's regime by analyzing the Code of Hammurabi.

    Unlike herdsman, "Shepard's" only flock is sheep (S57). "Artizan" is professional craftsman (S274). "Potter" makes pottery for holding things (S274). "Tailor" makes clothing and dress (S274). "Rope-maker" makes rope necessary for ship-running etc. (S274). "Mason" supplies house-builder the building raw materials (S274). "Warehouse-Operator" provides safe custody storage of goods and properties (S120).

  2. Is God necessary for morality?

    avoiding hell) - it could be argued that such a person is not a good person and should be sent to hell. Do human beings really need such threats in order for them to control their private behavior? Today, when moral arguments are made, the appeal is rarely to God's power to punish.

  1. The Two-Part Morality of Machiavellian Politics

    prince to be-to achieve greatness and power, with no thought for the welfare of the state. From this understanding, Cassirer criticizes Machiavelli's theory, because he believes that Machiavelli "is apt to forget that the political game is not played with chessmen, but with real men, with human beings of flesh and blood" (Adams 158).

  2. Post-Atheism: from Apophatic Theology to "Minimal Religion"

    Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagite provoked discussions between the Orthodox and the Monophysites in Constantinople in 533 AD, during which the head of the Orthodox rejected their authenticity." Later, however, these works became part of the canon of Orthodox patristic literature. It is also a fact that the ideas of negative theology played

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work