• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Reasons for and against the view that morality is independent of religion.

Extracts from this document...


Reasons for and against the view that morality is independent of religion Cupitt's starting point for ethics today begins with what he considers to be the cultural condition of our time and that is the rejection of the old 'realist' notion of God. * With the advent of non-realism notions of absolute truths have been rejected to be replaced by a solely human understanding of the world and God. * In terms of ethics this means there is no longer any God giving us a moral code and as such no moral absolutes independent of human experience. * Morality is now decided by humans with the context of different human communities. Cupitt argues that the traditional Christian view of God is repressive. Such a God has set out 'in the heavens' what is considered to be right and wrong behaviour in the world. For Cupitt, an objective God implies submission (or lack of freedom). Cupitt believes society has now embraced non-realism as such he believes it is no longer bound to follow realist forms of religious belief and ethics. ...read more.


Socrates asked. "Do gods love holiness and morality because they are holy, or is morality holy because the gods love it?" Put simply: if an existing god says something is good because he sees that something objectively is good, then the goodness of that thing is intrinsic in that thing; the good is independent of the god. In other words, if the god recognises that murder is wrong, then the wrongful act of killing is wrong even if the god doesn't see that. Morality or immorality in any action is not dependent on the god; god's will is determined by what he sees, not the other way round. God no more invented morality than Newton invented gravity. Imagine you're God. Make a world where circles have corners and two and two make five. If there are laws of physics that put finite conditions on God, then maybe there are moral restraints and restrictions on his alleged omnipotence and supposedly infinite power. Christian moralists can't accept this. It says that there are things that God simply cannot do. ...read more.


Philosophers call this natural process the "Social Contract". Selfish immorality is taking without giving back to the contract. Morality in society depends on equality in the contract - democratic public access. This can be achieved only through human rights education and legal procedural reform. We mustn't judge human action from pulpits or confessionals but through the courtroom, public votes and a non-secret media society. The best moralists are human rights activists. Many people do not yet get involved in social interaction and having a very poor part of the social contract. Many are blinkered by religions into thinking that their misery is a punishment from a god who will give everyone his final judgement after the last trump. Such believers forget to judge for themselves; they have no sense of government by the people for the people; they are governed by blind dogma. Their sense of morality is what someone else tells them to do. But morality isn't not killing, it's knowing why you shouldn't kill, and that requires real personal wisdom. Top of the school education syllabus agenda shouldn't be RE but social interaction skills. Morality can survive: for that to happen, we as humanists and humanitarians need to relearn how to negotiate the social contract. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. 'Dr. Faustus is a morality play without a moral.' Discuss.Let us first deal with ...

    It is clear that Faustus' damnation is due to his own faults and the persuasions of other characters. Although there are warnings and morals given throughout the play, it is questionable as to whether or not the audience would adhere to them as the play is very much concerned with

  2. Outline the view that there are no rights and wrongs in sexual ethics:To what ...

    Here, we can see the key to the biblical understanding of marriage. The sexual union between a man and a woman in marriage is not just physical and biological, but emotional, psychological, spiritual and social. Our whole beings are united in marriage and sexual intercourse is not just a physical response to a physical desire.

  1. Consider in depth the different forms of religious language and evaluate how far they ...

    For example, the statement 'There's an apple tree in my garden' can be empirically proved by going into my garden and seeing that there is an apple tree. On the other hand, the statement 'God exists' could only be proven (or verified)

  2. Post-Atheism: from Apophatic Theology to "Minimal Religion"

    Now God is beyond all that exists. In order to approach Him it is necessary to deny all that is inferior to Him, that is to say, all that which is. (...) Proceeding by negations one ascends from the inferior degrees of being to the highest, by progressively setting aside

  1. Outline the reasons why it may be claimed that religion and morality are linked. ...

    Conscience is a tool for observing the law of God in the human heart. He says that conscience is the voice of God speaking to us, which we must seek within ourselves. It is the most God-like behaviour, and it brings us closer to God.

  2. Is God necessary for morality?

    Charity, for example, is morally proper because God endorses it, and murder is wrong because God condemns it. But, where does God get these moral values? If they come from a still-higher power, he cannot be morality's supernatural source. If they do originate with him, what if he commanded otherwise?

  1. Examine the reasons for the view that morality is based upon religion.

    Secondly, Aquinas believed that there is a singular ultimate rule of natural law of which god is the basis; it is possible for humans through reasoning and deduction to discover what this ultimate rule is. Finally, he believed that successive extra moral rules could be conceived from this one ultimate

  2. Religion and Morality

    So, morality is dependent upon religion. William of Occam: "God cannot be obligated to any act. With Him a thing becomes right solely because he wants it so." Christians who accept DCT look to scripture to provide our moral standards - the Decalogue (10 commandments)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work