• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Influence of Repentance on the Self and Society. In his essay Of Repentance Montaigne argues that all people are born with a certain nature, some lean toward good and others toward evil, but we cannot change who we are. Therefore, if we

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To Repent, or Not to Repent-That is the Question: The Influence of Repentance on the Self and Society Repentance and regret are commonly thought to have the same meaning, but for Michael de Montaigne they are entirely different; repentance is the denial of one's natural, everyday actions and regret is wishing to undo them. In his essay "Of Repentance" Montaigne argues that all people are born with a certain nature, some lean toward good and others toward evil, but we cannot change who we are. Therefore, if we reason and act within our nature, then there is nothing to repent of. Moreover, repentance is not necessary because we should not be held to our actions and words of the past, because our public nature is constantly changing (Montaigne, 79) along with your inner nature (45-6). Montaigne's concept of a public versus private persona, one that he does not condone, and where one is showing the world a different person than one is at home, is a dangerous proposition for community and personal life because it excuses a beguiling lifestyle. If one listens to Montaigne and strays away from this, than one can live an overall better life. His point is valid, but if one does not listen, this life can lead to mistrust by others, losing the self, committing crimes, and sadness. In addition, religious repentance to a priest holds similar characteristics to personal, self-guided repentance where one determines if one's actions are acceptable. ...read more.

Middle

He even writes in his will to have his heirs continue his deeds (84). With this story comes the question of motivation. Are the man's childhood crimes forgotten because of his seemingly benevolent endeavors as an adult? According to Montaigne his motives are in the wrong. He is only looking to make up for his past actions, implying his good deeds supersede his earlier destructive actions. Moreover, despite this man's sadness for what he did it does not change his actions and there is no need to repent with them. Montaigne would agree with this statement because the man was acting on what he thought was right at the time, but he does not discuss how the man should neither regret his actions, simply learn from them. Additionally, regret promotes self-loathing, another concept he fails to discuss, which does not advance one's thinking. When one regrets actions of the past there is no room to learn from them. One must recognize that each and every decision is rooted in the heart and therefore one must refrain from feeling sorrow and anger. Montaigne continues to boast that he never found fault in himself because his actions were out of his control, but happened by luck (87). Thus, circumstances beyond our control dictate the decisions we make and because luck and chance are constantly changing, we are not able to repent because what is right may change in the future (87). ...read more.

Conclusion

He is alleviating all responsibility from himself by blaming his actions on luck, an obvious threat to community and personal life. Furthermore people are not impartial and generally do not like to think of themselves as in the wrong; there is always a justification for any action. Overall, Montaigne's model of the self is somewhat unsuited for today's society. If people were constantly looking past their actions without contemplation, there would never be human and societal growth. The beauty of humankind is that we have the capability to analyze our actions and understand the motives and reasoning behind them. If people were not judging others on, then no one would think to reassess him or herself. Social judgment, or questioning others is therefore important, but too much judgment and pressure only leads to one losing one's true self. It is essential, as Montaigne says, to remain true to the self and follow suit in all aspects of life, but if who you are is extremely detrimental to others, than a degree of acknowledgment is necessary. Even though at one point in someone's life they committed crimes and hurt others, it does not mean they should continue in the same manner. Therefore, a certain amount if repentance in necessary to understand one's actions. The result is an improved personal and community life. If one can learn from the past and remain true to the self in all his or her actions, then one has accomplished the goal that so many strive for; a goal that can be accomplished on a bigger scale if societal pressures were not weighing so heavily on the individual. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. Nonmoral Nature

    Equally important for the reader is the understanding and creating of one's own ideas on the area under discussion. Logic through critical thinking is what in fact makes the difference between an effective essay and a vain one. The way Gould uses the words and his sources helps the audience to make its own judgment on the subject.

  2. Famine purposes a great problem to humanity. Singer explains how famine in east Bengal ...

    Therefore, one should not criticize any person for not donating out of his or her will. I believe, donations should not come through the means of making one feel guilty of their spending, instead it should come from their care and unforced will.

  1. Ever since the beginning of human existence, humans have lived as individuals, solely concerned ...

    understand the origin of the government and also to understand that it has emerged in order to protect people's interests and the interest of the common good. As the concept of government was at its worst and started to loose its real essence, the Islamic religion was introduced by the Muslim Prophet Mohamed (PBUH)

  2. Human Nature

    On the one hand Confucius says that virtue is inborn in every human being and all he needs to do is call it out, "Is benevolence so far away? I wish for benevolence, and benevolence is attained" (Baird & Heimbeck, 314), which essentially means that he believes that human nature is intrinsically good.

  1. Where is the Common Good in Machiavellis Prince?

    an attempt to avoid war, as this way you are not escaping war, but simply postponing it to your own disadvantage.'15 Russell sums up Machiavelli's thoughts on this as follows: 'There are certain political goods, of which three are specially important: national independence, security, and a well-ordered constitution.

  2. Education provides a mechanism by which people are produced as docile subjects: the presence ...

    On this basis then, perhaps creating docile bodies is a necessity for any society that wishes to develop or retain a strong economic status. The emergence of Capitalism around the time of the 18th century could be argued as the reason for the unprecedented level of surveillance of the individual amongst society.

  1. Theories of life after death do not provide a solution for the problem of ...

    Both of them are used to give solutions for the problem of moral evil. Hell, is the place of eternal punishment for those whose earthly lives where morally wrong, there is no escape from hell. Believers, in God, especially those who believe is the God of classical theism, hell, can be the solution for the problem of evil.

  2. The Influence of Philosophy in the Roman Empire - A.W.

    Their system left room for many deities, each of which embodied a portion of the divine spirit. The Stoic did not look upon death as the end of all.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work