The Irish In Britain, 1845-1914 - Famine immigrants
Between the years 1845 and 1914, did the Irish in Britain constitute an outcast group or did they develop an accommodation with mainland society?____________________________________________________________________ As a result of the 1845 Irish Famine, many of the surviving Irish population were forced to immigrate to countries such as American, Canada and Britain. The situation that British settlers found themselves in is a matter still disputed between historians today, with the idea that the Irish were an outcast group aligned with the prospect that they managed to develop an accommodation in mainland society considerably well. The investigation of the prospect does require an insight into various aspects of Irish life from the employment issues, social conditions, political activity, religious concerns, the violence and disorder in the country and the position of both the Irish immigrants that arrived before 1845 and settlers in other countries such as America as a form of contrast. Given that first-hand sources from the Irish perspective at the time are very scarce, personal accounts from later dates are very valuable in gaining information on how the Irish settled. The Dictionary definition of ‘outcast’ is ‘a person who is rejected or cast out, as from home or society’, while ‘society’ it self is defined as ‘an organized group of persons associated together for religious, benevolent, cultural, scientific, political, patriotic, or other purposes.’ The definitions imply that a group that develops an accommodation with mainland society therefore, is a group characterized by sharing similar ideologies in the areas of religion and politics, as well as having ‘benevolent’ reasons, which suggests the group help and respect other members of their society. Before 1845, there was already a growing immigration rate from Ireland to Britain, due to reasons such as the search for better employment. The initial response of the British to this was a fairly negative one and the Irish were widely regarded as a burden to their otherwise prosperous economy and society. By 1845 and with the outbreak of the potato famine, the mass immigration of thousands more Irish citizens made the situation become far more intense and this background factor was what made the circumstances for the Irish in Britain different to the circumstances for those who settled in America. Though not all of the Irish were poor, the ‘largest and most visible group of emigrants’ were ‘Poor Irish Catholics’[1] which initially created immediate problems in Britain, but problems which potentially could be beaten in hope of creating and developing an accommodation in mainland society. Employment in Britain, or at least good quality employment, was very difficult to find for the Irish settlers, the majority of whom were ‘largely illiterate and unskilled’[2] and despite having made their living vastly from working on the land back in Ireland, they were now challenged by the highly developed Britain, as ‘subsistence agriculture in Ireland did not provide them with skills for commercial agriculture in Britain’.[3] As Ireland was nowhere near as industrialized as Britain, Irish workers would have problems adjusting, which inevitably was a cause for divisions between the English and the Irish. The Irish were perceived as being un-skilled immigrants who were pilfering jobs away from the British. This view can be accounted for by a page 2
Terence Dudleyvariety of factors, from anger at the unemployment rates and subsequently English workers taking their anger out on the immigrants in a hostile range, to the media messages and misinformation, with newspapers often pointing the finger at the Irish and the contributing to the general stereotype of Irish being ungrateful, unqualified and under educated, which became a commonplace label and would produce further problems with employment issues for Irish settlers. Nevertheless, regardless of where these divisions arose from, much of the evidence suggests that the Irish could be regarded as an ‘outcast’ group with regards to employment. First hand ...
This is a preview of the whole essay
Terence Dudleyvariety of factors, from anger at the unemployment rates and subsequently English workers taking their anger out on the immigrants in a hostile range, to the media messages and misinformation, with newspapers often pointing the finger at the Irish and the contributing to the general stereotype of Irish being ungrateful, unqualified and under educated, which became a commonplace label and would produce further problems with employment issues for Irish settlers. Nevertheless, regardless of where these divisions arose from, much of the evidence suggests that the Irish could be regarded as an ‘outcast’ group with regards to employment. First hand accounts published at the time are very sparse, but we can look at later date publications when Irish writers started to become more prominent in order to gain some first-hand views on employment from the period. J. B. Priestley’s ‘English Journey’ captures the conditions of the mass immigration, and tells how Irish Roman Catholics were ‘encouraged… to settle in [Liverpool]… probably to supply cheap labour’.[4] The majority of Irish, being ‘largely illiterate and unskilled’[5] were paid very poor wages and had no option but to live their lives in most destitute of conditions. Despite the negativity of the employment system for the Irish settlers however, Swift argues that it was not a case that could be generalized for all of the immigrants, and that by 1850, ‘there was a small middle-class world of professional men, doctors, lawyers, [etc]’[6]. Furthermore, Dublin newspaper ‘The Nation’ argued in 1872 that the economic position of the Irish depended ‘less on the structure of the Irish community’ and more on ‘the economic infrastructure of the area where they worked’[7]. Both arguments suggest that there was a small Irish middle class developing and that often, the employment regarding Irish immigrants depended less on them being of an Irish background and more on where they went in search of work, suggesting that the Irish were not so much an outcast group, as part of a nation in which a majority were struggling for work. This is clearly evident from the growth of Chartism in the mid 19th century, showing a widespread discontent, but the Irish being an equal part of this struggle rather than even victims of it is debateable. With employment levels being generally poor, it is no surprise that the Irish were also victim of underprivileged social conditions, which serves the point even more that the Irish were outcast and simply pushed aside from the rest of the population upon their arrival. J. B. Priestley describes memories of ‘slum streets, dirty little pubs, and the Irish’[8], reminiscing thoughts that it would literally take a miracle ‘before they will be properly cleaned up’[9]. Similarly, Anthony Burgess, in his novel ‘Little Wilson and the Big God’ of 1987, remembers ‘an ugly world with ram-shackle houses and foul back alleys, not a tree or a flower to be seen’[10]. The Irish were seemingly thrown aside to the lowliest of slums that Industrialization had created, with little thought or regard from the English. Geroid O’Tauthaigh provides an outlook of the Irish living conditions, depicting ‘open sewers and cesspools… their living conditions were generally the very worst’[11], and Thomas Carlyle in the pre-page 3 Terence Dudleyfamine period, 1839, tells of ‘crowds of miserable Irish darken[ing] all our towns’[12]. The situation of Irish immigrants before the famine evidently created social divisions, 1845 being a major catalyst and providing an estimated 300,000 more immigrants, only making matters a lot worse. In Liverpool, statistics show 5239 Irish deaths from a single fever in a single year, 1847[13], and provides evidence for ‘desperate need for extra space’ and ‘need for extra doctors and nurses’[14] The conditions were arguably arising from a mixture of factors. Irish immigrants were evidently neglected and outcast socially before 1845, and the mass immigration resulting from the famine created even more disregard with the Irish being perceived as ‘ignorant, dirty and primitive’[15] by the English. As well as this apparent ignorance for the Irish welfare however, the sheer number of immigrants alone made providing stable social conditions near impossible, regardless of whether or not people wanted to provide the help. Divisions between the Irish and the English can also be measured through the violence and abuse surrounding the years preceding the outbreak of the First World War. As well as the stereotypes of being un-skilled and ungrateful, a major typecast introduced upon the Irish was the idea that they were violent and heavily associated with crime. Again, these factors were worsened by media coverage, which often gave one side stories, and were worsened even more so by the police, a topic on which numerous historians, notably Graham Davies, agree that ‘the Irish scene was deliberately picked on to provoke scenes of disorder’[16]. Again the Irish were seemingly being cast aside in this sense and made to look like outcasts, a literal different type of person to the average ‘non-violent’ English man. Violence was the result of many different causes in itself, from social reasons, poverty, religion and more, but it is in itself worth considering as a point when looking at whether the Irish developed an accommodation in mainland society, as it provides evidence that the Irish ultimately, before the 20th century at least, were not properly taken seriously as equal citizens. For instance, the Murphy Riots of 1862, which had both religious and social connotations, in which ‘local protestant leaders’ who were ‘facing a 10% wage cut’, began taking up ‘anti-catholic feeling[s] and attacked the Irish’[17]. Despite the Irish being in a similar position of sharing the pain of poverty, immigrant discrimination served as a barrier for these efforts to be truly worked together. As Donald MacRaild argues, ‘the violence of the Irish was at least partly the result of the treatment they themselves received’[18], yet the stereotype applied only to the Irish and again, in this respect, they became socially outcast as opposed to a part of the mainland society. These Anti-Catholics feelings were obviously a major contribution to what arguably created an outcast group of the Irish. Donald MacRaild explains that ‘Few cities in the world had a more virulently anti-Catholic flavour than Liverpool’[19], and when considered that ‘the number of Irish entering the [Liverpool] port exceeded page 4 Terence Dudleythose going… anywhere else’[20], it is not surprising that the Catholics were subject to much exile within Britain. The persecution of Catholics contributed to some of the ‘most serious clashes’[21] between the English and Irish according to Roger Swift, evident again from the Murphy Riots, as well as Stockport, 1852, Oldham, 1861 and London, 1862[22], which demonstrate much religious-based upheaval all within 20 years following the start of the mass immigration in 1845. In this respect then, there is no way that the majority Protestant based Irish population can be considered as accommodated into the mainland society. On the other hand, some historians such as David Fitzpatrick argue that ‘it often mattered little whether an Irish immigrant was… a Protestant or a Catholic’, but even if this much is true, Fitzpatrick still argues that they ‘tended to be lumped together as ignorant, dirty and primitive’[23], so the group are still undeniably being outcast from mainland society even if their religion is overlooked. Politically, the Irish struggled to be part of mainland society and share political ideologies with the English, as often, political groups and ideologies would be based around discriminating against them. Leading politicians such as Tory leader Benjamin Disraeli would speak out, claiming the Irish to be a ‘wild, reckless, indolent, uncertain and superstitious race’ who ‘have no sympathy with the English character’[24] which again, created stereotypes of the Irish being ungrateful and out to deprive the English of their welfare. More extreme than this, the 1870’s saw ‘popular movements such as ‘Orangeism’ playing ‘an important grass-roots role in Liverpool Toryism’[25]. Orangeism provided the radical view that Roman Catholicism is a threat to the establishment and in adapting this ideology to the very prominent Tory party, many would pick up on the same beliefs and the already outstanding division between the Irish and English would cultivate. The comparison of these situations to Irish immigrants elsewhere provides a real contrast. Irish settlers in America in fact ‘enjoyed greater freedom of operation’ with regard to political affairs, and were ‘able to elicit greater sympathy for Ireland’s cause among the wider community’[26]. The worrying contrast between Irish immigrants in America and in Britian not only applies to political objectors, but also the ‘Irish community in America was wealthier than its counterparts in Great Britain’ in general, and moreover, they ‘often enjoyed more rapid upward social mobility than proved feasible in Great Britain’[27]. Irish settlers in America were not without problems of their own by any means, but still arguably constituted more of an accommodation with mainland society than the British immigrants did in the 19th century. Despite the political discrimination against the Irish, political principles did serve as somewhat of a way forward for the Irish in creating some form of unity and matching some of the prerequisites of being a part of the society, such as fighting for a shared political viewpoint. In the 1880’s and 1890’s, ‘Irish immigrants played a prominent role in the unionisation of unskilled workers’[28], and also, the Irish played page 5 Terence Dudleya very considerably role in the Chartist movement which pressurized the government for various points of the people’s charter and gained much from showing the government the general level of power and ambition the working classes could possess. This form of political shared principles suggests somewhat of an accommodation in mainland society, though again, evidence from the Murphy Riots suggests that even when political ideology was shared, anger was often taken out on the Irish at times. Graham Davies claims that ‘by the end of the century [1890’s], [the Irish immigrants] were beginning to assert themselves as community leaders’[29], rising through the ranks of social and political deprivation to become part of the mainland society. Davies also argues that ‘assimilation through intermarriage with British partners was to have the effect of making the Irish in Britain at least partly British in outlook and identity’[30] though whilst making the Irish more a part of British inland society, this questionably excludes those who did not get married to British partners and suggests the Irish have to relate to British rather than live in the society on their own terms. In conclusion, though the Irish situation did undoubtedly improve towards the start of the First World War in 1914, and despite the fact that Irish customs would inevitably work its way into English culture through the mediums of music, literature, sport and other means, the Irish were typically an outcast group following the mass immigration resulting from the Irish famine. Issues such as religious persecution, through both political and physical means, the vast array of employment concerns for the average refugee, the abysmal social standards of living and in addition, the stereotypes and messages spread throughout Britain that the Irish were not worthy to be part of the society generally had the consequence of the Irish being very much outcast rather than accommodated into mainland society, and even when shared ideologies such as fighting for working class rights created a sense of unity, these reflections were shattered when the Irish began to be blamed and persecuted for these existing conditions. Many sources depict scenes of deprivation, violence and a level of general loathsomeness that was not experienced in other immigrant dwellings such as America, in which settlers were provided with a considerable amount more empathy which enabled for more ease in settling into the society and becoming a part of it rather than being pushed away. Britain however, between 1845 and 1914, despite any of the hopeful signs, would contain the Irish to being no more than an outcast group on the whole.2499 words [1] Swift, R., ‘Irish in Britain, 1815-1914’ page 4 [2] Swift, R., ‘Irish in Britain, 1815-1914’ page 16 [3] Swift, R., ‘Irish in Britain, 1815-1914’ page 15 [4] Priestley, J., ‘English Journey’ page 249 [5] Swift, R., ‘Irish in Britain, 1815-1914’ page 16 [6] Swift, R., ‘Irish in Britain, 1815-1914’ page 17 [7] Swift, R., ‘Irish in Britain, 1815-1914’ page 17 [8] Priestley, J., ‘English Journey’ page 248 [9] Priestley, J., ‘English Journey’ page 249 [10] Burgess, A., ‘Little Wilson and Big God’ [11] Swift, R., ‘Irish in Britain, 1815-1914’ page 20 [12] Swift, R., ‘Irish in Britain, 1815-1914’ page 21 [13] Neal, F., ‘Black ’47: Britain and the Famine Irish’ page 128 [14] Neal, F., ‘Black ’47: Britain and the Famine Irish’ page 132 [15] Swift, R., ‘Irish in Britain, 1815-1914’ page 20 [16] Davies, G., ‘The Irish Diaspora’ page 27 [17] Davies, G., ‘The Irish Diaspora’ page 29 [18] MacRaild, D., ‘The Great Famine and Beyond’ page 51 [19] MacRaild, D., ‘The Great Famine and Beyond’ page 55 [20] Neal, F., ‘Black ’47: Britain and the Famine Irish’ page 90 [21] Swift, R., ‘Irish in Britain, 1815-1914’ page 29 [22] Swift, R., ‘Irish in Britain, 1815-1914’ page 29 [23] Swift, R., ‘Irish in Britain, 1815-1914’ page 20 [24] Swift, R., ‘Irish in Britain, 1815-1914’ page 28 [25] MacRaild, D., ‘The Great Famine and Beyond’ page 55 [26] MacRaild, D., ‘The Great Famine and Beyond’ page 222 [27] MacRaild, D., ‘The Great Famine and Beyond’ page 222 [28] Swift, R., ‘Irish in Britain, 1815-1914’ page 17 [29] Davies, G., ‘The Irish Diaspora’ page 32 [30] Davies, G., ‘The Irish Diaspora’ page 32