• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Italian policies of Frederick Barbarossa

Extracts from this document...


The Italian policies of Frederick Barbarossa, German king and Holy Roman Emperor had a huge impact on medieval Germany during the 12th century. The question of ecclesiastical versus secular power broke out during the emperor's reign at a time when Germany was considered to be the strongest monarchy, having authority in Italy and the rest of the Roman Empire. The time was right at Frederick Barbarossa's accession in 1152 to restore imperial authority in Italy which had been in demise since the Investiture contest. However this goal threw the Holy Roman emperor into a conflict with the papacy, an obstacle that would prove too hard to overcome in order to achieve all that which the emperor thought was denied to him. However the Papacy also paid a price for holding Frederick in opposition. The Italian policies were far too extent and were finished incomplete. The emperor's Italian policies at which he aimed to retrieve from the papacy what he thought he was entitled to, were controversial but innovative. Frederick aimed, with the help of Chancellor Rainald of Dassel to reconstruct the Holy Roman Empire to return it to the glory days of Rome and exercise the authority that the Ottonian emperors had done.1This battle for land was in essence a ...read more.


This proved to wreck many of Frederick's ambitions and gain support for the papacy.9 Alexander III gained the support of France and the Anglo-Norman Kingdom, while in Denmark and Poland the remaining allies of the imperial pope were exiled.10 A year later Alexander was able to establish the city of Alessandria with the help of the League. The city of Alessandria was to the emperor a symbol of papal achievement, and although efforts for settlement with the pope continued, the presence of the Lombard League was something the emperor could not allow during peace. The Italian policy again prevailed with the fifth campaign in 1174 against Alessandria. The emperor again faced defeat and was able to make peace in Montebello with the League, but the Italian policy once again got in the way when Frederick could not accept the inclusion of Alexander III in the peace. Frederick's stubbornness in following his Italian policies (even in opposition to the papacy) however was weakened and a small success was granted to Alexander. The battle of Legnano in 1176 resulted in a near complete destruction of the imperial supremacy in Italy and convinced the emperor to reconcile with the pope.11 Negotiations at Anagni achieved a "far reaching settlement" 12 between emperor and pope. ...read more.


It had "radically altered the place of the papacy in the church"16 and left the Holy Roman emperor's successors with many claims unanswered. The hard line of Alexander III had not been continued and the emperor was left for sometime unopposed. The Lombard communes can be recognised as the real reason the papacy emerged successful 17 but still the papacy had the future to deal with, a future that found them surrounded by the Holy Roman Emperor's authority. Both the emperor and the Papacy paid the price of conflict, but the Papacy was successful enough to immobilise the Italian Policy of Frederick Barbarossa. 1 M, Pacaut Frederick Barbarossa (London, 1970), p.52 2 P, Munz Frederick Barbarossa (London, 1969) p.121 3 Ibid p.119 4 C. W. Hollister, Medieval Europe; A Short History, Edition Eight (New York, 1998) p.236 5 G, Barraclough Medieval Germany 911-1250 Volume One (Oxford,, 1948) p.226 6 Hollister, p227 7 Ibid p.236 8 Barraclough, Medieval Germany 911-1250 p.226 9 Ibid p.226 10 Ibid p.228 11 Ibid p.227 12 Ibid p.229 13 Barraclough, Medieval Germany 911-1250 p. 229 14 C, Morris, The Papal Monarchy; The western Church from 1050-1250 (Oxford,1989) p.198 15 Barraclough, Medieval Germany 911-1250 p. 230 16 G, Barraclough The Medieval Papacy (New York, 1968) p.112 17 Ibid p.107 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Ancient History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

**** A well written piece that discusses the benefits and drawbacks of the free market over the centrally planned economy. Many main points are touched on without going into the necessary depth. A more methodical approach to the debate might have been more revealing.

Marked by teacher Dennis Salter 04/04/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Ancient History essays

  1. Genghis Khan's most significant contribution to the Mongol empire was the creation of a ...

    It was said that the Yassa worked so well that if a carload of gold was left unsupervised overnight it would not be touched. Another significance of Yasa was the loyalty, obedience, honesty and discipline it brought to the army, which greatly contributed in their victories.

  2. Hercules and Theseus, the two great hero's of the Greek Mythology.

    At a very young age both characters became heroes by killing monsters and doing good to mankind. Theseus's "...idea was to become a great hero as quickly as possible..." On his way to Athens he killed many bandits and he also killed the Minotaur.

  1. Does Akbar deserve the title 'Great'?

    This is a really great thing. Most rulers would give preference to those of the same religion as him and treat people of different religions, very unfairly. Akbar did not do that. This shows, how great he was. Akbar wanted the Mughal Empire to grow.

  2. What are the advantages and disadvantages for reconstructing the history of the Roman Empire?

    attributes of leaders who didn't make much of a mark otherwise such as the one made by Lucius Metellus to his father Quintus Metellus as described by pliny.7.43-44 this is a good reflection of the historical social status that the Romans held so high and shows in context the public displays important role in their lives .

  1. Discern the Aims of Alexander the Great

    Most historians of this school of thought underpin Alexander's competitive nature as his main driving force to conquering Asia. Hammond states that "Alexander himself believed that he must compete with Phillip, Cyrus the Great and Heracles and surpass them all"4.

  2. The League of Nations was a great force for peace in the 1920’s. Discuss

    On 29 August he demanded compensation from Greece and execute the murderers however the Greek government had no idea who they were.

  1. Advising that the empire should not be extended beyond its present frontiers.' (Tacitus)With ...

    Great Rebellion which was a great and bloody revolt in Pannonia and Dalmatia which Tiberius finally crushed in AD 7-8 in Pannonia, and in AD 9 in Dalmatia.

  2. How did the design of the Colosseum give form to its public function and ...

    92), and goes on to describe the re-enactment of a mythical mating between the goddess Pasiphae and a bull. Seneca describes how the crowd was offered "sheer butchery.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work