To what extent are Napoleon's reforms during the Consulate (1799 - 1804) explained by his need to secure himself in power?

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

:://History To what extent are Napoleon's reforms during the Consulate (1799 - 1804) explained by his need to secure himself in power? Napoleon, having seen many governments come and go, was weary of the problems involved in governing a country. Napoleon realizing the failures of past governments, wanted his to be a secure and lasting government. He wanted to unite all power in the country at one centralized base. These are the ideals that flow through his reforms under the consulate. His reforms are aimed at gathering all power to him, the main areas of reform were; the constitution, religion, the legal system, the judicial system and the economy. All of these reforms, in one form or another, were means to gathering and centralizing power around him. After the coup of Brumaire, there was confrontation between Sieyes, the original mastermind behind the coup, and Napoleon. There were differences in opinion and ideals between the two men on how the country should be run. Napoleon utilized Sieyes to his own end and forced through his changes to the constitution. The constitution of the year VIII was composed mainly of Napoleons ideals; it was a great success for him.

Middle

The pope had much to gain in the sense that any influence in France is better than none, by signing the concordat the pope gained some influence in France. This again was a way of gaining support from the people, making the people think that he is doing what is best for the country when in reality he is choosing the best course of action that suits him and his administration. By legalising Catholicism in the country, his popularity among the people rose. Napoleon realised the advantages of this, he could use the church as a method of control amongst the people. He could distribute his message to the whole of France via the churches, considering most of the country was catholic and attended church regularly. Considered one of Napoleons greatest legacies amongst the people of France was The Civil Code. It was drawn up during 1800 but took another three years to actually introduce. It was an attempt to unify the legal structure of the whole country. As it stood when Napoleon came to power, laws varied from town to town, this was quite the opposite to Napoleon's idea of centralization. The code made sure that all the people of France had equality in the eyes of the law, religious freedom and a separation of the state and church.

Conclusion

He wanted the secondary school system to have a strict National Curriculum and have an Authoritarian system, to teach the pupils what he wanted. He wanted them to be loyal to his regime; he also wanted to prepare them for administrative jobs in the government and as soldiers in the army. In 1802 he introduced the Lycees, which was mainly for the sons of the middle class of society, quite the way away from the roots of the revolution. The state appointed the teachers; this meant that Napoleon had control over who teaches and what is to be taught in schools. A ministry to control education across France was also introduced by Napoleon, the Imperial University, albeit the name it was not a university. The school system was under the direct control of Napoleon, he had great influence over the future citizens of France, he could tailor them to accept his regime and breed loyalty among the young. Overall Napoleons reforms were aimed at increasing power but as a side-effect of this he also managed to aid the French people. He pursued any action necessary to make sure that he and his administration gained support. Often at times he intentionally or unintentionally also aided the French people through his reforms, the civil code is an example of this. ?? ?? ?? ??

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1800-1899 essays

  1. Assess the interpretations of French historians and Pieter Geyl on Napoleon.

    Playing on the nation's hopes, Louis Napoleon transformed the Second Republic into the Second Empire. Historians, suspicious of Louis Napoleon, began to reexamine their interpretations of the elder Napoleon11, taking a much less forgiving view of his failure to bring political liberty.

  2. Did Disraeli achieve his aims in his social reforms 1874-80?

    This is emphasised by the recollections of Cross, Disraeli's Home Secretary, who recalled 'from all his speeches, I had quite expected that his was full of legislative schemes, but that did not prove to be the case; on the contrary, he had to entirely rely on the various suggestions of his ministers...

  1. Assess the social reforms of Disraeli's Second Ministry, 1874-80.

    dismissed unfairly whereas the employer could sue the employee if he/she had broke the contract. This was popular amongst Trade Unions as it brought further equality to the workplace. The last Act of 1875 was the Conspiracy and Protection of Property Act.

  2. To what extent can Napoleon be seen as "heir to the revolution" in his ...

    There was also a double shift in French trade under Napoleon, with it moving away from the Atlantic and towards continental Europe; and with it increasing its trading goods in cotton, coal, and iron instead of previously being centered on coffee, sugar, and tobacco.

  1. Balance of Power or Hegemony: An Investigation of Paul W. Schroeder's Thesis

    machinery for soldiers, poor leadership, and logistical (such as a poor transportation system) and financial limitations. Succinctly, her ability to act in international affairs was blocked by several inherent obstacles that primarily came from within and not from the other powers.

  2. Did Kaiser Wilhelm II at any time exercise real power?

    Kaiser Wilhelm proposed a meeting with the striking workers to discuss wages, working hours and conditions whilst Bismarck was pressing for a set of anti-socialist laws to be passed by the Reichstag. After stating that the army should be sent in to crush the uprising, Wilhelm replied that he "wasn't

  1. Why did it take so long to defeat France in the Revolutionary and Napoleonic ...

    west having the price of disarray in the east which was later exploited by Russia. The economic power of all other European nations is another important factor in analysing why Napoleon was not conclusively defeated until 1812-14. E.E. Kraehe suggests that by 1809 Austria was 30% weaker economically than in

  2. Why were Marx's expectations of a proletarian revolution in western Europe never realised?

    The relative affluence of skilled labour made it less interested in talk of revolution and the overthrow of the capitalist system. This led to divisions within the labour force, and therefore reduced the likelihood of a solidaristic working class consciousness.

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.