• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the English Invasion of Irelandan accident, unforeseen and unplanned?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐To what extent was the English Invasion ?an accident, unforeseen and unplanned?? ________________ When regarding the English invasion of Ireland, characterised by the Richard Fitz Gilbert?s initial invasion in 1169, followed by King Henry II?s arrival in Ireland in 1171, one could argue that it was ?an accident, unforeseen and unplanned?. Indeed, evidence questions that this was even an invasion, but that the Normans were auxiliary forces to Diarmait Mac Murchada in 1169, whose aims consisted of restoring the deposed monarch to the kingship of Leinster.[1] In addition, Henry?s aim in 1171 was merely to consolidate power over Norman held territory in Ireland as his subject Fitz Gilbert, or Strongbow, was sowing the seeds for a kingdom to rival England.[2] However, although it could be argued that the invasion was not foreseen and planned by Henry?s courts initially, the motives, plans and actions of other parties involved would influence his decision in eventually claiming territories in Ireland. Therefore, it is evident that the invasion was not the product of a grand plan, which was purposeful and foreseen, but was formulated through the plans and motives of different parties and the reactions of the Norman king to them. In regards to the invasion itself, a comparison must be drawn between it and the previous invasion of England of 1066, as under the leadership of William the Conqueror which was purposeful, foreseen, planned and executed on a large scale. ...read more.

Middle

His cultivation of good relations between Leinster and England is testament to this and although he may not have realised the sheer importance of this in his earlier kingship, he surely realised this when he was overthrown in 1169. This is displayed with how he directly sailed to Bristol to make use of his relations with Fitz Harding, who had the power to grant him an audience with Henry.[21] One would, therefore, conclude that his campaign to win back his crown was purposeful, foreseen and planned. Diarmait?s monarchic restoration to Leinster may have been planned and would set the piece for an Anglo-Norman takeover, but it would be Strongbow who would catalyse events for this takeover. Any argument for an actual Anglo-Norman invasion laid in the fact that he would aid Diarmait?s campaign of expansion throughout Ireland with his own forces.[22] The Annals of Ulster support this fact by stating that this was ?the beginning of the woes of Ireland?. Regardless, it would be his actions that would push the hand of the Norman King to consolidate his feudal lordship over Anglo-Norman territories in Ireland. These series of actions were started with his alliance with Diarmait which was to see him married to Diarmait?s daughter, and to become heir apparent to the throne of Leinster.[23] This alliance not only saw Diarmait with a powerful ally with access to Jewish moneylenders,[24] testament to his planned campaign, but set Strongbow in a seat of Irish power with the margin to expand it. ...read more.

Conclusion

[16] James Lydon, The Lordship of Ireland in the Middle Ages, p. 32 [17] F. X. Martin, ?Dairmait Mac Murchada and the coming of the Anglo-Normans?, A new history of Ireland II: Medieval Ireland, Art Cosgrove (ed.), 1993, p. 48 [18] F. X. Martin, ?Dairmait Mac Murchada and the coming of the Anglo-Normans?, A new history of Ireland II: Medieval Ireland, Art Cosgrove (ed.), 1993, p. 49 [19] F. X. Martin, ?Dairmait Mac Murchada and the coming of the Anglo-Normans?, A new history of Ireland II: Medieval Ireland, Art Cosgrove (ed.), 1993, p. 48 [20] Edited in Jean Leclerq, Recueil d?etudes sur Saint Bernard et ses ecrit (3 vols, Rome, 1962-9), ii, 313-12 [21] James Lydon, The Lordship of Ireland in the Middle Ages, p. 32 [22] Ibid, p. 38 [23] Flanagan, Irish Society, ch.3 (80-111) [24] James Lydon, The Lordship of Ireland in the Middle Ages, p. 34 [25] F. X. Martin, ?Dairmait Mac Murchada and the coming of the Anglo-Normans?, A new history of Ireland II: Medieval Ireland, Art Cosgrove (ed.), 1993, p. 74 [26] James Lydon, The Lordship of Ireland in the Middle Ages, pp. 38-39 [27] F. X. Martin, ?Dairmait Mac Murchada and the coming of the Anglo-Normans?, A new history of Ireland II: Medieval Ireland, Art Cosgrove (ed.), 1993, p. 80 [28] Ibid, p. 56 [29] Sheehy, Pontificia Hibernica, I, pp. 19-23 [30] James Lydon, The Lordship of Ireland in the Middle Ages, p. 40 [31] James Lydon, The Lordship of Ireland in the Middle Ages, p. 39 [32] Ibid, p. 42 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Medieval History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Medieval History essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    If sodomy/homosexuality was 'unmentionable' in the Middle Ages, how can we write its history?

    5 star(s)

    Contemporary writers also offered their own interpretation of sodomy, again equally diverse and different. Chaucer in his Parsons Tale defined sodomy as having intercourse in such a way that "child may not be conceived."14 Through the twelfth centuries in line with the Church attitudes hardened Alain of Lille's work The

  2. Marked by a teacher

    T o what extent does the Demographic Transition Model provide a reliable and accurate ...

    4 star(s)

    The Black Death of 1348 was one of the most violent checks to demographic growth, due to the first explosion and the relentless cycles that followed. It was only until the sixteenth century that the population of Europe returned to that of 1340, due to expansion through a strong rallying.

  1. A Critical Analysis of the Sack of Limoges (1370) according to Jean Froissart

    Another issue that modern scholars now disagree with is the length of time that the siege is said to have lasted. Within Froissart we are told that the miners dug there tunnel for around a month and during this time there were no skirmishes or assaults allowed by the Black Prince.

  2. England Under Henry VIII

    The two armies came up with one another when the Scottish King had also crossed the river Till, and was encamped upon the Hill of Flodden. Along the plain below it, the English, when the hour of battle came, advanced.

  1. What impelled the English to fight the Hundred Years War?

    to gain wealth, a French tract even states that the English were through plunder and robbery, for example a French tract states that the English were 'living by robbery at the expense of their... neighbours'_. This is reinforced by John Bromyard when he states that the Englishmen's 'desire for gain'_ makes them 'more inclined towards the devil than to God'.

  2. How important was royal patronage in the establishment and development of Portuguese overseas empire ...

    input of the Portuguese crown of ships, men and supplies the impetus truly came from the actions of the individual viceroys of India who were autonomous in their actions in name only of the kings of Portugal. So in the context of establishment and development of Portuguese empire in India the crowns actions were minimal.

  1. Place-Name Evidence for the Coexistence of Viking Settlers and other Groups in Derbyshire

    the Old West Scandinavian name Melmor, which is a form of the Old Irish name Maelmuire, meaning 'servant of Mary'. According to Cameron, this place-name is further evidence of the settlement of travelers from the north-west of England who accompanied the Vikings.

  2. How seriously did people take claim that kings ruled with Gods blessing?

    society alone without the existence of the nobility; undermining his scared rule.[18] Analysing that the peasant classes did not seriously take claim that kings ruled with God?s blessing is somewhat difficult because of the lack of sources available. Nonetheless a solitary source is from Hilton and Fagan on their analysis of the peasants? revolt in which took place in 1381.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work