• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the United States responsible for the collapse of the Grand Alliance at the end of the Second World War?

Extracts from this document...


Academic Research Task - To what extent was the United States responsible for the collapse of the Grand Alliance at the end of the Second World War? The Grand Alliance was the term given to the co-operative mutual assistance relationship between the western powers, especially the United States and Britain, and the Soviet Union, which was formed to engineer the defeat of Nazi Germany in the Second World War. For the duration of the conflict, relations between these nations were fairly good: the Americans supplied billions of dollars' worth of war material to the USSR under the Lend-Lease arrangement (though with little enthusiasm: the first shipments did not arrive until late 19421), the Allies made attempts to co-ordinate their military activity, and all were agreed on the common understanding that defeating Hitler's Germany was essential for world peace and international security. Propaganda photographs of American and Soviet troops exchanging handshakes over the ruins of a defeated Third Reich gave every impression that the era of antipathy and hatred between nations was over, and that a new order of peace and prosperity would be built on the back of a crushed swastika.2 In reality however, by the end of the war the alliance was falling apart. Even before Germany had been defeated, major chasms were opening between the allied powers, and after the war concluded these divisions only widened. The exact date by which the alliance had totally collapsed can be disputed, but it would be uncontroversial to assert that this date can fall no later than the end of the Berlin blockade in May 1949. All semblances of co-operation disappeared, and the world was plunged into a four decade-long confrontation of nuclear proportions, the Cold War. It has been argued that the actions of the United States were primarily responsible for the alliance's collapse, that the foreign economic policy of America after 1945 represented an attempt to expand its influence into the already-agreed-upon Soviet bloc in Eastern Europe, or certainly nothing less ambitious ...read more.


that.* With respect to Poland especially, Stalin had already shown his contempt for national democracy movements by allowing the Wehrmacht to crush the Warsaw uprising in August-October 1944, and had a pro-Soviet puppet government ready and waiting to take over from the German authorities.18 Previous Soviet treatment of Finland and the Baltic states gave every indication needed of how Stalin would react to attempts made at installing democracy in other countries. Nevertheless, the Yalta communiqu� produced from the conference was an unequivocal assertion of the right of east European states to free elections. Section V pledged all of the allied powers, including the Soviet Union, to "the earliest possible establishment through free elections of Governments responsive to the will of the people", and asserted "the right of all people to choose the form of government under which they will live".19 It does not need to be repeated that Stalin never had any intentions of carrying out the requirements of this passage. Immediately after the war the leaders of national communist parties, many of whom had spent the pre-war and wartime years in exile in Moscow and had long been subdued under Stalin's whip, began their gradual accumulation of power. Invariably, the communists would contest a free-ish election under the auspices of the Red Army, win a minority of the vote (as little as 17% in Hungary and never more than 38%, in Czechoslovakia), and then agree to take part in a coalition government. Under pressure from Stalin, their rivals would agree to give communists control of ministries of justice and of the interior, which would then be used to "disappear" political opponents. In Poland the Soviet puppets' methods were less subtle: a massive campaign of violence and intimidation preceded the first postwar elections in 1947, and the communists claimed 80% of the vote.20 Despite assertions by some historians that western leaders "handed over" Eastern Europe to the Soviets at Yalta, short of a full-scale war with the USSR there was little if anything Roosevelt and Churchill could have done to prevent Stalin from turning eastern European countries into satellite states. ...read more.


2-3, Abacus (2008). 3 McCauley, Martin (1995), Origins of the Cold War, revised 3rd edition (2008), pp. 89-91, 148-9, Pearson Education. 4 McCullough, David (1992), Truman, p. 565, Simon & Schuster Paperbacks. 5 Isaacs and Downing, p. 69. 6 Schlesinger, Arthur J., Jr. (1967), 'Origins of the Cold War', Foreign Affairs (46), October 1st, 1967; reproduced in McCauley, pp. 118-9. 7 Speech given by General Marshall on June 5th 1947 to Harvard University, announcing the European Recovery Programme. Department of State Bulletin, XVI, June 15th 1947, p. 1160; reproduced in McCauley, pp. 148-9. Also available online at: http://www.oecd.org/document/10/0,3746,en_2649_201185_1876938_1_1_1_1,00.html, retrieved August 28th, 2011. 8 Speech given by Andrei Vyshinsky to the UN, September 18th, 1947. United Nations, General Assembly, Official Records, Plenary Meetings, September 18th, 1947, pp. 86-8; reproduced in McCauley, pp. 150-1. Also available online at: http://slantchev.ucsd.edu/courses/nss/documents/vyshinsky-criticism-of-truman-doctrine.html, retrieved August 28th, 2011. 9 Williams, William Appleman (1962), The Tragedy of American Diplomacy, rev. ed., Delta Books, New York; reproduced in McCauley, p. 120. 10 McCullough, p. 508. 11 Isaacs and Downing, pp. 64-8. 12 Brown, Colin and Mooney, Peter J. (1976), Cold War to D�tente: 1945-85, second edition (1981), pp. 13-5, Heinemann Educational. McCauley, pp. 78-9. 13 Williams, reproduced in McCauley, p. 119. 14 Isaacs and Downing, p. 39. 15 Brogan, Hugh (1985), The Penguin History of the USA, p. 570, 2nd ed. (1999), Penguin (2001). 16 McCullough, pp. 442-3 17 Service, p. 508. 18 ibid, pp. 471-2. 19 Yalta conference communiqu�, February 1945. Full text accessible at: http://www.h-net.org/~hst203/documents/YALTA.html 20 Isaacs and Downing, pp. 28-30. 21 Black, Conrad (2003), Franklin Delano Roosevelt: Champion of Freedom, p. 1079, PublicAffairs (Perseus Books Group). 22 McCauley, p. 78. 23 Brown and Mooney, pp. 13-5. McCauley, pp. 78-9. 24 James F. Byrnes, US Secretary of State, described Soviet actions in the case of Iran as imperialist on March 27th, 1946, quoted in McCauley, p. 79. 25 Brown and Mooney, pp. 13-4. 26 Isaacs and Downing, pp. 71-91. 27 Service, p. 510. 28 ibid, p. 501 ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 Max Christopher Henry Norman 16 Hertford Drive, CH45 7PX, UK (+44) 151 637 2193 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1950-1999 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1950-1999 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    A look at the Origin, Stigma/Discrimination and Government Involvement with AIDS in the United ...

    4 star(s)

    Homosexuals, heroin users, hemophiliacs and Haitians (the Four H's) were seen as infected outcast of society. Since the beginning of the AIDS pandemic, homosexuals have been associated with this disease. The AIDS virus was nicknamed "Gay Related Immune Deficiency", "the gay plague", or "gay cancer" after the outbreak begun.7 Homosexual men were singled out for this disease because the

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Did Britain become a Classless Society after 1945?

    4 star(s)

    gain an education and career prospects which had previously been the privilege of the middle and upper classes. These educational reforms also affected the upper classes as attempts were made to reform the public schools where "a watered down scheme would have seen Eton and the rest obliged to take

  1. To what extent were ideological differences the cause of the Cold War from 1941 ...

    George F. Kennan, Deputy Chief of Mission in the US Embassy in Moscow, analysed and summarised the growing hostility between the USSR and the USA; "There can be no possible middle ground or compromise between the two...The two systems cannot even exist in the same world."

  2. Free essay

    The Fall of Communism in Poland. The Catholic Church Solidarity and its ...

    still exists within Socialist states around the world, Lanford states: " In an effort to maintain support and stifle dissent, the communist regime maintained rigid control over the information people could obtain." Kemp-Welch, Poland under communism: A cold war history (2008)

  1. Explain the origins of the Cold War.

    By January of 1949, Harry Truman called for an even broader pact, which eventually would involve the United States, Canada and ten European nations. The North Atlantic Treaty was eventually signed April 4, 1949. NATO was created with the sole aim of protecting Europe from Soviet aggression.

  2. In what ways, and to what extent, did Eisenhower's foreign policy demonstrate the limits ...

    power's realised this, it was this realisation which would lead Kennedy back into the arms race in the 1960s. To conclude, Eisenhower's foreign policy acted to display to foreign powers, and to those within the USA, America's internal weaknesses and limitations of power.

  1. Why did the USSR collapse?

    So, citizens of colonies don't accept participation in elections into authorities of all empire and don't participate in management of empire. It is difficult to imagine that the Hindu or the Australian became the prime minister, or at least simply minister, in the government of Great Britain.

  2. Why were those who believed in genuinely democratic market socialism unable to prevent the ...

    Reformers faced the dangerous process of making fundamental alterations to ideologies and structures that had resisted major change for more than twenty years. Gorbachev began democratising party ideology by striving to rehabilitate previously taboo notions of individual enterprise, self-betterment and competing interests within society, while gradually phasing 'communism' out of the lexicon of his public speeches.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work