What insights into late Victorian gender and social relations can be gleaned from a study of the press coverage of the 'Jack the Ripper' murders?

Authors Avatar

05183723

What insights into late Victorian gender and social relations can be gleaned from a study of the press coverage of the ‘Jack the Ripper’ murders?

This essay will look at how the press coverage of the ‘Jack the Ripper’ murders strengthened the idea of the East End as a dangerous place and therefore raised the sense of a division existing between those in the East End of London and those who lived in respectable areas. It will examine how the rise of the press in the nineteenth-century enabled those who were at the helm of society to be able to impact on the thoughts of the nation as a whole. It will also look at how women were treated in this period and will examine why many women were effectively ‘forced’ into prostitution in the East End due to the prevailing social conditions endemic in this area. It will be shown that although there was a rise in the late nineteenth-century of social explorers and of social missionaries, little was done to make safer an area of the metropolis highlighted by these ‘explorers’ as dangerous and in need of reconstruction. Changes in physical infrastructure such as lighting, housing and sewerage systems were as important to effecting change in these area as were the moral crusades of people such as William Booth, the Salvation army founder and evangelist, who advocated that change could be brought about ‘only by Christian compassion, abolition of the poor law system, the establishment of self help communities…a return to village life…and assisted emigration overseas.’ It can also be shown that the rapid growth of the newspaper industry in the late 19th century affected the way in which specific social groups were perceived by people of the time. The publication of certain letters by the press, purporting to be from Jack the Ripper, enhanced the notion that women who did not adhere to strict moral codes were at risk of being a victim of ‘The Fiend of Whitechapel’. However, these options were not always available to the women of the East End due to social conditions of the time.

1880s London was a city of two parts. With a population in excess of four million, it was the largest city in the world, but in many ways it can be looked at as having been two separate cities divided by class and social conditions as well as by geographic definitions. The West End in 1880s London was a thriving capitalist machine at the very heart of what was considered, at least by the British, to be the greatest empire in the world. It was seen as being the epitome of all that was good, honest and decent in society, at least by those that lived there and inhabited the environs of the elite circles and the ‘standard’ middle-classes. The East End, with a population of one million people, was seen by these same groups as everything that was wrong with society, dark and dirty with slums and rookeries, of foul stench and mean streets, of vice and prostitution and the dangerous underworld of a largely unknown social jungle. A number of social ‘adventurers’ made the journey from the ‘enlightened’ west to trek through the dark East End jungle, ‘armed with nothing more than a map, notebook and Bible’ to catalogue the inhabitants of these dark and dangerous areas, in an attempt to understand what made the people of the East End the underbelly of society and in some cases to ‘convert’ them back to moral and spiritual ways. This view of the divisions in Victorian society is borne out by Walkowitz‘s statement, that ‘In the last decades of the nineteenth century, journalistic exposes highlighted this geographic segregation, impressing on Londoners the perception that they lived in a city of contrasts, a class and geographically divided metropolis of hovels and palaces.’ These social exposes by people such as Henry Mayhew (London labour and the London poor) and W T Stead (The maiden tribute of modern Babylon) did much to highlight the conditions that people lived in. Although Mayhew did not put forth any salient proposals as to how these people should be made better off, the work of W T Stead and the Pall Mall Gazette in orchestrating the moral and political panics of the period, did help to initiate a public outcry over the conditions of slum housing after excerpts were published from ‘Outcast London’ in 1883.

Join now!

One of the more notorious areas of the East End was that of Whitechapel. It was well known as an area of high immigration for Jewish refugees of European Pogrom’s and from the 1850s Irish immigrants after the great potato famine. Whitechapel was synonymous with crowded, squalid housing conditions and a haunt for those engaged in prostitution and crime. In the autumn of 1888, this notoriety for violence and danger was greatly enhanced by the ‘Whitechapel murders’ and by the emergence of the first known serial killer (a term not used at the time) who was given the name of ...

This is a preview of the whole essay