• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What were the Reasons for the Successes Achieved by the First Crusade?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐What were the Reasons for the Successes Achieved by the First Crusade? In 1092 Pope Urban II appealed the Council of Clermont to call a Crusade.[1] Despite there being an existence of four reports of this appeal, there is no doubt that it led to the First Crusade of 1095 on the Muslim world which was now in a state of disunity.[2] The Seljuk leader, Malik Shah, had controlled swathes of Asia Minor and Syria and was a binding force of the Muslim world, but with his death in 1092, his lands fractured into separate emirates. This splintered Muslim world, which was to suffer the impact of the Frankish invasion, was amplified by a year of death among its hierarchy in 1094. This left Asia Minor, Syria and Palestine bereft of any major leaders to lead a unified Muslim force against the Franks, as the remaining rulers struggled to fill the power vacuum.[3] Although Muslim disunity was a predominant factor for the successes of the First Crusade, it was not the sole factor, as the Franks faced stiff opposition in the forms of hunger, disease and battle, regardless. Therefore, one could argue that Muslim disunity gave the Franks a foothold to manipulate religious fervour, military expertise and a united cause to succeed in executing the First Crusade. ...read more.


The fact that they were aided by the Byzantines suggests that part of their success in the crusade was due to the aid of their Greek counterparts. When they crossed over to Muslim lands Emperor Alexius II even provided them with the Byzantine generals, Manuel Boutoumites and Tatikios, whose knowledge of the lands were important in the eventual capture of the city in 1097.[12] Therefore, one can see how the Frankish battlefield tactics and the fact they had consistently outnumbered their enemies had helped them to overcome Muslim armies and to accomplish the success of the First Crusade. Religious fervour was also important in Frankish military successes. One can see that with the siege of Antioch the winter saw starvation on a massive scale, yet despite this, the Franks had captured and held the city.[13] This resilience, which religious fervour had created, was emphasised with the discovery of Holy Lance, through the holy visions of Peter Bartholomew.[14] Regardless of whether or not the lance and visions were real, It gave the Franks the religious fervour to sally forth and fight Kerbogha, resulting in a Frankish triumph. Moreover, with the death of the Papal legate, Adhemar of Le Puy in 1098, the binding force, between the crusading leaders, whose concerns involved ...read more.


Coupled with the ineffectiveness of the Franks? battlefield tactics, survival of the Franks was placed under tremendous pressure, indicating that these factors were needed in the survival of the Frankish states. Overall, one can see how it was Muslim disunity which the Franks exploited in order to gain success in the First Crusade. With Muslim politics in disarray, The Franks were able to take advantage of secondary factors in the form of religious fervour, a united front of initially 60,000 and unorthodox and successful battle tactics to overcome hunger, disease and Muslim warlords of the area. However, when faced with a united Muslim world characterised by the reigns of Nur ed-Din and Saladin, one can see that the Franks suffered greatly. Indeed, there is a breakdown of the secondary causes of the success of the First Crusade demonstrated with the loss of religious fervour and unity and the adaption of the Muslim world to the Frankish battle tactics. This theory is emphasised when the fragmentation of the Muslim world caused by Saladin?s death in 1193, allowed the German Crusade to successfully take Beirut and Sidon in 1197.[20] Hence, Frankish success was epitomised through Muslim disunity in the First Crusade, but not only that, it became a theme throughout the crusading period in Outremer. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Medieval History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Medieval History essays

  1. Who were the winners from the interdict dispute of 1206-1214, and who were the ...

    England had become a Papal state and would receive support from the Church when it was arguably at its most powerful. By accepting the conditions set out in the Treaty of 1213, John lost support from his barons, this led to Magna Carta being signed.

  2. Were the Crusades a shameful episode in the history of the west?

    and killing any peasants and livestock in their path until the richest and most populous part of the Byzantine Empire became little more than a desert.5 The most worrying event for Christendom was the capture of Jerusalem by the Seljuk Turks in the early 1070s.6 Many of the Christian population

  1. How far must we consider the Norman Conquest as a Military victory

    When deciphering whether the Norman Conquest was purely based on their military might, the most obvious place to start is with their arrival in England on the 28th September 1066 and the ensuing battle of Hastings that followed. Considered by most to be the turning point in English history, Hastings

  2. To what extent did commerce flourish in this period?

    This was because of the Pax Romana: a decree that protected both trade and manufacture. With the loss of this safeguard it became dangerous to travel any distance with valuable articles. The once peaceful Roman Empire had become a melee of warring Germanic tribes who each sought supremacy over the

  1. Why was it so hard to resolve the Great Schism?

    The French academic and cardinal, Pierre d'Ailly, set the terms in which the issue would be most widely debated among the clergy and universities in his 1381 tract 'Utrum indoctus in jure divino posset juste praeesse in Ecclesiae regno'.6 In it, three basic models were proposed for resolving the schism:

  2. causes of third world debt

    The three countries, "Brazil ($116 billion), Mexico ($97 billion), and Argentina ($61 billion) had the most troublesome numbers" (Rogoff 1991). What the least developed countries owed to industrialized nations was staggering. Most of the creditors were privately owned commercial banks.

  1. The History and Importance of Chinese Literature.

    It also tried to generate inspiration through the monkey?s tireless efforts for the accomplishment of his dream of getting to India. What is notable in his literature is that it is connected to Chinese life and tradition and every word symbolizes a piece of history from the Chinese dynasties (McDougall, Bonnie, 2003).

  2. To what extent was the English Invasion of Irelandan accident, unforeseen and unplanned?

    Having established that Henry was forced to react to the growing power of Strongbow, one should note that Henry was also under pressure from the Catholic Church. The idea of an Irish invasion at the council at Winchester was supported by the clergy present.[28] Likewise, Pope Adrian IV had commanded

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work