• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Chartism Fail?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Chartism fail? The question why Chartism failed and why it was so quickly has never been answered to a satisfactory level. If Chartism was a reaction to hunger and to the disorganisation of traditional industries then the good economic climate which followed the Great Exhibition of 1851, the increase in stability of Britain's industries in this period and the organisation in which new industrial workforce was allowed to develop is enough to say why Chartism declined and died. The 'hunger Chartism' was the rational movement moved into the organisation of consumer cooperatives, new model trade unions, reading-rooms, mechanics' institutes, local government, friendly societies and other organisations which skilled workers developed at the end of the nineteenth century. This implies to some extent a betrayal by the skilled and frequently employed of the ambitions of the less fortunate associate. This could mean that the idea of 'a conscious move by the employing class to divide the skilled workers from the rest'. The Chartist period shows a conflict between the 'hegemonic middle class and the traditional culture of the British working class'. This conflict is only seen by the end of Chartism and by the inclusion of articulate members of the working class into the traditions and values of the middle class. (Thompson p. 330) In the 1860s when parliamentary reform was looked at again under the leadership of the Reform League many of the old Chartist leaders e.g. ...read more.

Middle

However, we also have to look at why Chartism failed, is it because of the leadership, the flawed leader being Feargus O'Connor. Chartists aimed for one man one vote but this was not achieved until after the Second World War and their vision of Parliament who would be responsible to the whole people, was never achieved. Working men were carefully admitted into the electoral system between 1867 and 1919, but as more people were admitted the rules changed. The power of the non-parliamentary elements of government, civil service, the judiciary and other advisory organisations, were only accessible to those who had been educated within a system where the working class people were excluded. The first working men to enter Parliament went through the cordon sanitaire of Liberalism. These men were 'safe' men who showed reliability by cooperation with the Liberals in local politics or industrial negotiations. 'The Chartists' aim of a free, universal system of education, controlled by the communities in which children lived, also died with Chartism'. The post-Chartist years were regarded by a series of Factory Acts with educational provisions, similar by an increase in a network of 'provided' schools, offered by rival religious bodied which were supported by government grants in the 1870 Act after this school attendance became compulsory. The Chartists aim of an education system moved further away in the post-Chartist period and finally disappeared. ...read more.

Conclusion

Julian Harney and other leaders in the movement in East London believed themselves to be apostles of 'that great philosopher and redeemer of mankind, the Immortal Thomas Paine' they established the East London Democratic Association in 1837 and broadcasted its objective ' the achievement of a democratic and republican England-a natural society based on the principles of liberty, equality and fraternity'. The hungry people of the industrial North and Midlands attached more importance to the social and economic consequences which were a result from gaining the franchise than to manhood suffrage itself. The aspirations were too sectional and often too formulated to be seen as an economic programme of the whole movement supplementary to the Charter. Therefore, everyone agrees that the achievement of the Six Points was a crucial first step. (Mather, p. 26-27) Chartism failed in its purpose on effecting an immediate transition to democracy they contributed to the slow evolution of the British constitution in a democratic direction. The Chartists campaign had encouraged a portion of the middle class in taking up franchise reform to win over the working class support in order to win against Toryism and aristocratic privilege. The Complete Suffrage movement of 1842 and the New Reform movement of 1848 were both linked to the Chartists. The Chartists learnt slowly that constitutional change could be brought about if they cooperated with the middle class radicals; the movement played a part in building up the pressure which produced the 1867 Reform Act. (Mather, p. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1800-1899 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1800-1899 essays

  1. US History. The Womens Rights Movement Through the Civil War.

    She then wrote in her diary, " It does my heart good to see them."11. 9 Flexner, Century of Struggle, The Woman's Rights Movement in the United States, 85. 10Dubois, Feminism and Suffrage, The Emergence of an Independent Women's Movement in America, 49.

  2. Liberal Divisions and the 1870 Education Act

    has been most wanted, state help has been least given, and that where it was desirable that state power should be most felt it was not felt at all.'2 Thus the system had failed to meet its objectives, and the defects present in the existing scheme largely influenced the form of the Education Act.

  1. What interpretations can be made as to the extent of brigandage and also the ...

    In such an intense climate of social inequality where the peasant has no share in the same land he helps sustain, the Brigand lifestyle actually becomes an appealing option. The historian David Hilton Wheeler provides various examples of the apparent correlation between harsh poverty and the emergence of rebellious groups.

  2. 'The Republican Party of 1860 bore little resemblance to the Republican Party of 1900'. ...

    7 The late 1890s represented a time of great strife for African-Americans with the prominence of lynching in the South and the passage of the Jim Crow laws which legalised segregation. 'In the 1890s an average of 187 lynchings occurred every year, mostly in the South'.8 By 1900, it seemed

  1. Biography of Thomas Wentworth

    Investigations into the Yorkshire cloth industry were aimed at regulating worker wages, though also cut into the capitalists' profits. His enforcement of the 1601 Poor Law ensured work and provisions for the poor, though at the same time made him unpopular with the gentry as it drained their coffers and

  2. Did the lives and status of women change as a result of the ...

    Similarly, for haymaking in 1770, a woman earned 6d per day whilst her male counterpart would earn 1s. 2d. This appears to correspond with the idea of patriarchy, and that women were inferior in status. We shall see whether this changed when exploring the impact of industrialisation.

  1. The Myth and Purpose of Modernity

    direct opposite of the African depictions which would later be made by various colonial projects. This fact is important because as A. Adu Boahen notes, "the African rulers were initially regarded as the equals of their European counterparts," which means that their subsequent inferior depictions were either how European officials

  2. It didnt happen here. Why didnt socialism prosper in the USA in the period ...

    Dangerous working conditions were common; according to the Bureau of Labour Statistics [58] America had a national death rate of 61 workers per 100,000 in 1913 [59]. Basic public regulations regarding housing, food production, sanitation and health were either unenforced or non-existent after the civil war, as were working regulations and checks on corporate power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work