• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the Third Republic survive the Boulangist movement and the Dreyfus Affair?

Extracts from this document...


Why did the Third Republic survive the Boulangist movement and the Dreyfus Affair? The Third Republic was confronted by many crises up to 1914, but the two most serious, and the two most responsible for the division of opinion in the country, were those in which General Boulanger and Captain Dreyfus became the respective symbols of opposition to, or support for the Republic. The Boulanger crisis revealed the danger permanently lurking beneath the surface of French political life, of the ability of a charismatic leader to rally around himself all those bearing resentment toward the regime. The Dreyfus Affair showed the Republicans, and eventually the Socialists, that the union of the former constituents of the ancien regime; the army, the Church and the aristocracy, now imperiled the political life of the Republic. Despite this apparent instability, neither General Boulanger in 1887, who seemed briefly the heir to the Bonapartist tradition, nor the Conservatives who used the Dreyfus Affair as an opportunity to attack the Republican constitution, were able to bring about the collapse of the political system. These two major crises were symptomatic of the many problems facing the Third Republic. Externally there was the problem of the relative decline of France in the hierarchy of nations, especially with regard to Germany. Internally, there was the problem of the rise of the working class and the appearance of the masses on the political scene. Underlying both problems were the deficiencies in the economic system and the social problems to which they gave rise. If the Third Republic was to survive, it would have to address all these major social and political issues. ...read more.


The Dreyfus Affair would mark the main stage in this reversal of party positions with regards to national unity, and the army would thus present the Republic with its second great challenge. The pre-conditions for the Affair were laid down in 1891, when Germany extended the Triple Alliance to include Austria-Hungary and Italy; it was an alliance which seemed particularly hostile to France. In addition, the insoluble problem of Alsace-Lorraine excluded any possibility of rapprochement with Germany. It was therefore inevitable that in such a period of insecurity and doubt, the position of the French army would attract a great deal of public attention. The nation needed to know if the army was loyal to the Republic, if it was becoming the embodiment of certain religious opinion and if it represented an independent power within the state. Was the army the saviour of the nation or the destroyer of democratic principles? It was against this background of self consciousness that the Dreyfus affair assumed such crucial importance. The case of Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish officer on the general staff wrongly accused of spying, became a major political affair which divided French society into two bands of passionate partisans. Those who believed him to be innocent declared that the military authorities, who had accused and judged him, had stopped at nothing to conceal their duplicity and incompetence. They had, as the Dreyfusards pointed out, forged and suppressed evidence and conspired to prevent justice in the interest of what appeared to be an anti-Semitic, anti-Republican officer corps. To the opponents of Dreyfus, the army seemed the defender of the security and greatness of France, and as such, the military as an institution was above criticism. ...read more.


The most successful politicians of the Third Republic were those who manipulated the parliamentary machine in such a way as to further the interests of the rural areas and quiet country towns. It was for this reason that throughout the two major crises, the regime was never seriously in danger. While those on the right called for strong government, they were not able to overthrow a system which seemed to satisfy the desire of Frenchmen to be free of Government interference. In fact few Frenchmen wanted a strong government as most were content with verbal criticism, while supporting economic policies which did not touch their pockets. The Dreyfus Affair marked the beginning of a period of government in which the Radical Socialist party introduced measures of mild social reform, while not interfering with the economic interests of their electors. The power of moderate opinion in the French provinces was also built into the constitution, and it is perhaps a measure of the satisfaction felt with the system of the Third Republic, that demands for further reform of the Senate after 1882 were slow to come and never very important. Neither the Boulangists nor the anti-Dreyfusards were thus able to overcome the vested interests which the Third Republic had created for itself. The crisis of 1914 was to reveal the underlying national unity of France, as patriotism overcame all doubts on the right about democracy, and all doubts of the left about bourgeois society. The Dreyfus Affair and Boulanger crisis had revealed just how deep and widespread the support for the Republican constitution was, and it would not be until the 1930's that the system was once again seriously challenged. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1800-1899 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1800-1899 essays

  1. Assess the interpretations of French historians and Pieter Geyl on Napoleon.

    Frank A. Kafker and James M. Laux. Gainesville, FL: Krieger Publishing Company, 1989. A valuable source, which thoroughly assessed the interpretations of the different periods during his era. Soboul gives a background information on the historians and evaluates Napoleons personal characteristics and charisma.

  2. What problems faced Bismarck in Germany in the period 1871-1890, and how successful was ...

    However the passing of the May Laws did not stop the Roman Catholic religion from taking route and if anything Bismarck and Falk had only encouraged them. The Prussian state reacted by imprisoning priests and bishops. Further state pressures were applied through the Prussian Landtag law of March 1874 which

  1. To What Extent Was Bismarck Responsible For The Unification Of Germany In1871

    Austria knew that war was inevitable so began to mobilize its forces. Austria's army was far less organized so they had to mobilize before Prussia to be on level terms. This once again made Prussia out to be the innocent party while Austria was the aggressor.

  2. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for the unification of Germany?

    To complete the unification process Bismarck needed to fight the French. This was simply because the French would never accept a powerful united Germany on their doorstep. When Napoleon asked for Luxembourg, which he had been promised if he stayed neutral, Bismarck refused to give it to him.

  1. Account for the union of Italy

    tension from the governing elites wanting a say in the run of their country. This sense of nationalism although restricted to their own provinces shows a development in the unions cause. One can not really ignore the influence from the radicals such as Mazzini who started such programmes as the

  2. 'It has been claimed that Britains financial institutions were too oriented towards overseas investment ...

    term credits,partly because of the centralization mentioned above and partly because of the conservatism. Michael Collins1 looked at the records of Lloyd's and what he found out,was that in a local level, there was still a continuous existence of this permanent overdraft throughout the late Victorian period.

  1. It didnt happen here. Why didnt socialism prosper in the USA in the period ...

    [52] as ?The Gilded Age? [53] also brought with it problems, highlighted by the increasing disparity between the top and the bottom of society, with 10% of the population controlling 90% of the wealth. By the end of the 18th century, a small class of ?super-rich? had been created in America, who owned corporations outright or through trusts.

  2. The Impeachment of Andrew Johnson and the Reconstruction

    Under the presidential theory the President was the only person in charge of reconstruction. This theory caused a bitter struggle between the executive and the legislative branches of government. The ?state suicide? theory was the opposite of the presidential theory in the sense that instead of the President having control over reconstruction, Congress had control over it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work