Why is Joseph Stalin significant in history?

Do not show me this again

Are you in the right place?

Jump to History and see how teachers think you should prepare in:

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

Why is Joseph Stalin significant in history? Joseph Stalin was one of key figures in 20th century history. He transformed Russia during his time in power. In this essay, I will be discussing the life and influence of Joseph Stalin upon the Soviet Union and the world. Stalin has a long life and a long political career too. He was dictator (or comrade) of Soviet Russia from 1929 right up until his death in 1953. Stalin is a household name fifty years after his death, even though he didn't start wars like Hitler did or make such bold moves. As far as world history goes, he didn't do that much, but he transformed Russia from a minor rural country into a great and powerful industrial nation. Joseph Stalin was born in 1879 in what is now the republic of Georgia. His real name is not Stalin, he changed his name to Stalin, which means 'man of steel' in 1910.

Middle

In the revolution of November 1917, Stalin was not seen as a great revolutionary, but more of a 'grey blur'. (Microsoft Encarta 1995) After Lenin's death in 1924, a trio of communists comprising Stalin, Zinovyev and Kamenev lead the country. However, Stalin ousted these 'rivals' by clever manipulation and by his 50th birthday in 1929, Stalin was the sole dictator in communist Russia. One of Stalin's first schemes when he came to power was the controversial collectivization program where, in an attempt to increase agricultural production, millions of peasants were uprooted and moved cross-country. Stalin's name will also live in infamy for the execution of millions of his 'enemies'. Political opposition, people who he saw as a threat and others who didn't agree with 'Stalinism' either vanished or were sent to labour camps in the far reaches of the USSR.

Conclusion

The USSR had a 'temporary' wartime alliance with Britain and the US when fighting Germany, but when Hitler had been defeated, the alliance turned sour. The establishment of communism in virtually all eastern European countries coined the phrase 'Iron Curtain' and made the west suspicious of Stalin's aims. Stalin's view towards the western powers had always been slightly frosty, and postwar east-west relations deteriorated rapidly, in many people's view, due to Stalin's aggressive and hostile foreign policy. He was suspicious of many of the western states, especially the US and the UK. He saw capitalism as evil and aggressive. Stalin played his part in the increasing of tensions in Europe between capitalist west and communist east. His blockade of Berlin in 1948 proved he was a serious leader to deal with and the US and USSR were on the brink of war. 'His single-minded determination to prevent yet another devastating assault on the USSR from the West had much to do with the growth of the cold war' (Microsoft Encarta 1995)

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1950-1999 essays

  1. Fidel Castro led the overthrow of the Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista in 1959 to ...

    militiamen to leave the trenches, and return to their homes and work places. Castro accepted the president's words, and stated that the Cubans would too begin a new. The willingness of Castro to accept, respect, and trust the newly elected presidents words is quite impressive.

  2. U.S. - Soviet relations.

    As Kennan perceived it, the Soviet personality was neurotic, conspiratorial, and untrustworthy. Such impressions were only reinforced when Stalin suddenly announced a nonaggression treaty with Hitler in August 1939, and later that year invaded the small, neutral state of Finland.

  1. Konrad Adeneur. Adenauer understood that rearmament was an essential step in his policy ...

    NATO and the organisation for European Economic co-operation. When Charles de Gaulle came to power in June 1958, Adenauer under the advice of Hans Globke went to Paris to meet De Gaulle. Adenauer and de Gaulle first meet in Colombey on the fourteenth of September 1948.

  2. Does Deterrence work?

    This defence of deterrence has a number of problems. Firstly, it assumes that the destruction of millions of individuals, including those on both sides is more preferable than to live under a foreign rule or being able to pass the right to be free to descendants, this appears to be a case of "better dead than red".

  1. Tsarist rule in the years 1857-1917 and communist rule from the death of Lenin ...

    Evidently, the Tsarist regime displays central control, however the early 20th century showed that the Tsarist regime had less autocracy than there had been. Russia under Stalin however was a one party dictatorship controlled by Stalin, who had no legal right to the power that he possessed.

  2. A history to overcome

    Recently the United Nations rated the quality of life of Aboriginal the second worst on the planet only ahead of natives from a few provinces in China (Aboriginal Health). This is obviously a major issue in the Indigenous culture. According to a study in 2004, sixty five percent of Indigenous Australians will obtain at least one long term health condition.

  1. Global and National developings resulting from the Cold War.

    NATO was a treaty whose intent was to solidify the allies to the West and separate the nations to the East. It was a return to the system of allies that destroyed Europe in World War One. The Warsaw Pact was less significant, however, because its member nations were already puppet states of Russia and their alliance was assumed.

  2. Examine the role of Fidel Castro in East/West relations.

    (Blasier 102) Another author describes the relationship between Castro and the Cuban communists as being "not very good" (Lundestad 94), so, for the time being, there was no impetus on the part of the Soviets to pursue a strong relationship with the island nation .

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.

Do not show me this again

Are you in the right place?

Jump to History and see how teachers think you should prepare in: