• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why is Joseph Stalin significant in history?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why is Joseph Stalin significant in history? Joseph Stalin was one of key figures in 20th century history. He transformed Russia during his time in power. In this essay, I will be discussing the life and influence of Joseph Stalin upon the Soviet Union and the world. Stalin has a long life and a long political career too. He was dictator (or comrade) of Soviet Russia from 1929 right up until his death in 1953. Stalin is a household name fifty years after his death, even though he didn't start wars like Hitler did or make such bold moves. As far as world history goes, he didn't do that much, but he transformed Russia from a minor rural country into a great and powerful industrial nation. Joseph Stalin was born in 1879 in what is now the republic of Georgia. His real name is not Stalin, he changed his name to Stalin, which means 'man of steel' in 1910. ...read more.

Middle

In the revolution of November 1917, Stalin was not seen as a great revolutionary, but more of a 'grey blur'. (Microsoft Encarta 1995) After Lenin's death in 1924, a trio of communists comprising Stalin, Zinovyev and Kamenev lead the country. However, Stalin ousted these 'rivals' by clever manipulation and by his 50th birthday in 1929, Stalin was the sole dictator in communist Russia. One of Stalin's first schemes when he came to power was the controversial collectivization program where, in an attempt to increase agricultural production, millions of peasants were uprooted and moved cross-country. Stalin's name will also live in infamy for the execution of millions of his 'enemies'. Political opposition, people who he saw as a threat and others who didn't agree with 'Stalinism' either vanished or were sent to labour camps in the far reaches of the USSR. ...read more.

Conclusion

The USSR had a 'temporary' wartime alliance with Britain and the US when fighting Germany, but when Hitler had been defeated, the alliance turned sour. The establishment of communism in virtually all eastern European countries coined the phrase 'Iron Curtain' and made the west suspicious of Stalin's aims. Stalin's view towards the western powers had always been slightly frosty, and postwar east-west relations deteriorated rapidly, in many people's view, due to Stalin's aggressive and hostile foreign policy. He was suspicious of many of the western states, especially the US and the UK. He saw capitalism as evil and aggressive. Stalin played his part in the increasing of tensions in Europe between capitalist west and communist east. His blockade of Berlin in 1948 proved he was a serious leader to deal with and the US and USSR were on the brink of war. 'His single-minded determination to prevent yet another devastating assault on the USSR from the West had much to do with the growth of the cold war' (Microsoft Encarta 1995) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1950-1999 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1950-1999 essays

  1. U.S. - Soviet relations.

    As Kennan perceived it, the Soviet personality was neurotic, conspiratorial, and untrustworthy. Such impressions were only reinforced when Stalin suddenly announced a nonaggression treaty with Hitler in August 1939, and later that year invaded the small, neutral state of Finland.

  2. Why was "vice" and sexual scandal a public worry in 1950s London

    Chris Waters has highlighted the fact that tabloid journalists investigating "vice" were portrayed as heroic crusaders, who would 'root out "moral rot" '.8 In the 1950s London became an arena for the victimisation of the male homosexual, and there was widespread support for its continuation.

  1. Marred by violence, ravaged by terrorism: A brief history of (in)security in ...

    It is also worth noting that a proper national census program has not been undertaken in over eighty years5 and that much of the Palestinian refugee population that played a significant role in the country's civil war, has arguably been one of the biggest victims of the country's constitution- a

  2. Fidel Castro led the overthrow of the Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista in 1959 to ...

    considered a Soviet attack, and the United States would retaliate in full measure against both countries. After thirteen tense days, the Soviets agreed to withdraw their weapons and Kennedy pledged that the United States would not seek to overthrow the Cuban government.

  1. Global and National developings resulting from the Cold War.

    On June 17th, 1954, the CIA sent a task force to invade Guatemala and overthrow its powerful Communist Party. The team of 450 men was successful and the Party was effectively destroyed. The CIA and the United States realized that it could destroy Communism close to home by force.

  2. Do Great Men change the course of history? Discuss with reference to either Lenin ...

    The change which occurred in these years, preceding and immediately following Lenin's death, proved decisive for the whole subsequent course of world history. The failure of the western revolution destroyed the strategy, which had hitherto underpinned the practice of the Bolsheviks.

  1. A history to overcome

    Even the people who do own their own property, it is most likely in remote desert areas of the country. Some Indigenous communities do not own their own land; and in some cases overcrowding can occur. This is just one of the factors that can lead to health problems.

  2. Critical Review: A History of Postwar

    a "hero of the mightiest war ever fought and could afford to be set in his ways."5 While Pethybridge suggests that if Khrushchev wanted to hold onto his newfound power he had to embrace de-Stalinization other historians argue that Khrushchev wanted to make these changes in order to begin the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work