Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was Khrushchev removed from power in 1964?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why was Khrushchev removed from power in 1964? In 1964, Khrushchev was forced out of parliament by his colleagues. This happened because he lost the confidence of powerful interests in Communism. In my opinion, I think this happened due to 5 reasons. I will explain my theory below. Firstly, and arguably most importantly, the Cuban missile crisis. In 1962, Fidel Castro was the leader of Cuba. Nikita Khrushchev agreed to buy the sugar from Cuba; in fact this was the same sugar America was refusing to buy. But, this was in return for a big favour; Russia could base their nuclear missiles on Cuban soil. Castro agreed. Khrushchev was picking a blatant fight with Kennedy, just for the purpose of winning. He wanted Russia to have a diplomatic success. He thought he could win it because Kennedy was "inexperienced" and "young". Also Kennedy was proven to be inept. This was proven in the "Bay of Pigs" affair in 1961. In the Bay of Pigs affair, the left-wing Castro took over all of the sugar plantations, which irritated the Americans. ...read more.

Middle

In his power struggle, he took the side of the hard-line Stalinists, in favour of traditional heavy industries. This made him popular among colleagues. However, when he had complete control of Russia, he changed his views and took the side of "cotton-dress industrialisation", this meant more emphasis on consumer goods. There was an overthrowing attempt but it fell through. Khrushchev was very devious but he got his own way and there was more emphasis on consumer goods in industry. His main reform was in 1958 when he introduced 105 regional economic councils "the sovnarkhozy". Every sovnarkhoz had to manage the affairs of its region. The sovnarkhozy was just something for Khrushchev to use to hide behind the "metal-eaters". The sovnarkhoz was discarded after Khrushchev's downfall. There were low wages in industry, no overtime but there was no unemployment. This led to over manning in factories. Fourthly, and again most importantly, the Virgin Lands project. When Khrushchev took over, Russia was finding it hard to feed itself, due to a large population increase. ...read more.

Conclusion

Lastly, Was Khrushchev's personality and style to blame for his downfall? Below, I will make a table of his personality positives and negatives. + - Energetic Dynamic Gregarious Good humoured Uncouth Hot tempered Impulsive Foul mouthed Undignified Embarrassing As you can see, the negatives weigh out the positives, his colleagues got particularly tired of him by 1964. I will demonstrate a couple of examples of Khrushchev's behaviour. In 1962, Khrushchev was invited to an art exhibition by Bilyutin. He went into the gallery and inspected the paintings, while inspecting he swore unpleasantly about the work he was looking at and he said, "a donkey could do better with its tail" and "it looks like horse manure". In 1960, Khrushchev attended the UN general assembly in New York. When Prime Minister Macmillan of the UK was speaking, Khrushchev did not agree with him and he took his shoe off and banged it on the table in front of all the leaders. This was very degrading for Russia. All of these reasons played a part in the downfall of Nikita Khrushchev. His colleagues forced him into retirement. He left as leader of the Communist party in late 1964. ?? ?? ?? ?? Lee Bettis 10n Dr White ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1950-1999 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1950-1999 essays

  1. U.S. - Soviet relations.

    The Atlantic Charter represented the embodiment of Roosevelt's quest for moral justification of American involvement. Presented to the world after the president and Prime Minister Churchill met off the coast of Newfoundland in the summer of 1941, the Charter set forth the common goals that would guide America over the next few years.

  2. The Cuban Missile Crisis was the closest the world has every come to nuclear ...

    (Schelsinger 803). Edwin Martin, Llewellyn Thompson, and Conrad Meeker wanted the United States to act within the parameters of international law. Meeker was the Acting Legal Adviser at that time and Martin was the Assistant Secretary for Latin America. Thompson stressed the importance of law in Russia, and the significance

  1. Communism in China

    Under this program the small agricultural collectives were merged into far larger people's communes. All private food production was banned. Livestock and farm implements were brought under collective ownership. Many peasants were ordered to undertake massive infrastructure projects like digging canals or building dams.

  2. How can we best explain the failure of Kennedy administration in the Bay of ...

    The Eisenhower administration made many flaws, still enjoying in the victory of Guatemala in 1954. I would say truly that No one in the executive realized that they were leading Cuba in the opposite direction. Kennedy was right to be critical of the administration in his famous debates with Nixon during the 1960 presidential campaign.

  1. Fidel Castro led the overthrow of the Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista in 1959 to ...

    While the UN, under pressure from the United States, holds an economic strain of an embargo over Cuba, justified by Castro's violation of human rights. Castro advocates for human rights that aid his economic, political, and social policies, not on the basis that every human being deserves basic rights.

  2. Does Deterrence work?

    and the Horn of Africa (1970-90). Internal conflicts include Cuba (1959-90), Iraq (1958-78) and Libya (1969-80). Michael Walzer argues from a consequentialist point if view that deterrence is right. His theory maintains that, since human well-being is the basis of judging an action, moral judgements will be based on the prospect of bringing about a greater good or lesser evil.

  1. Cuban missile crisis.

    But he occasionally showed a good-natured humor and the simple tastes of his peasant background. Khrushchev also greatly changed Soviet foreign policy. He wanted to avoid war with the Western nations and, at the same time, increase economic competition between Communist and non-Communist countries.

  2. "Nuclear weapons cause more problems than they offer solutions." Discuss.

    These statements ended the era of the implicit threat which had been evident to the world since Hiroshima, and fulfils Hedley Bulls' first criteria for deterrence. There are a number of consequences to the threat of deterrence. In relation to the cold war, some argue that it escalated the arms

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work