• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was Khrushchev removed from power in 1964?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why was Khrushchev removed from power in 1964? In 1964, Khrushchev was forced out of parliament by his colleagues. This happened because he lost the confidence of powerful interests in Communism. In my opinion, I think this happened due to 5 reasons. I will explain my theory below. Firstly, and arguably most importantly, the Cuban missile crisis. In 1962, Fidel Castro was the leader of Cuba. Nikita Khrushchev agreed to buy the sugar from Cuba; in fact this was the same sugar America was refusing to buy. But, this was in return for a big favour; Russia could base their nuclear missiles on Cuban soil. Castro agreed. Khrushchev was picking a blatant fight with Kennedy, just for the purpose of winning. He wanted Russia to have a diplomatic success. He thought he could win it because Kennedy was "inexperienced" and "young". Also Kennedy was proven to be inept. This was proven in the "Bay of Pigs" affair in 1961. In the Bay of Pigs affair, the left-wing Castro took over all of the sugar plantations, which irritated the Americans. ...read more.

Middle

In his power struggle, he took the side of the hard-line Stalinists, in favour of traditional heavy industries. This made him popular among colleagues. However, when he had complete control of Russia, he changed his views and took the side of "cotton-dress industrialisation", this meant more emphasis on consumer goods. There was an overthrowing attempt but it fell through. Khrushchev was very devious but he got his own way and there was more emphasis on consumer goods in industry. His main reform was in 1958 when he introduced 105 regional economic councils "the sovnarkhozy". Every sovnarkhoz had to manage the affairs of its region. The sovnarkhozy was just something for Khrushchev to use to hide behind the "metal-eaters". The sovnarkhoz was discarded after Khrushchev's downfall. There were low wages in industry, no overtime but there was no unemployment. This led to over manning in factories. Fourthly, and again most importantly, the Virgin Lands project. When Khrushchev took over, Russia was finding it hard to feed itself, due to a large population increase. ...read more.

Conclusion

Lastly, Was Khrushchev's personality and style to blame for his downfall? Below, I will make a table of his personality positives and negatives. + - Energetic Dynamic Gregarious Good humoured Uncouth Hot tempered Impulsive Foul mouthed Undignified Embarrassing As you can see, the negatives weigh out the positives, his colleagues got particularly tired of him by 1964. I will demonstrate a couple of examples of Khrushchev's behaviour. In 1962, Khrushchev was invited to an art exhibition by Bilyutin. He went into the gallery and inspected the paintings, while inspecting he swore unpleasantly about the work he was looking at and he said, "a donkey could do better with its tail" and "it looks like horse manure". In 1960, Khrushchev attended the UN general assembly in New York. When Prime Minister Macmillan of the UK was speaking, Khrushchev did not agree with him and he took his shoe off and banged it on the table in front of all the leaders. This was very degrading for Russia. All of these reasons played a part in the downfall of Nikita Khrushchev. His colleagues forced him into retirement. He left as leader of the Communist party in late 1964. ?? ?? ?? ?? Lee Bettis 10n Dr White ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1950-1999 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1950-1999 essays

  1. U.S. - Soviet relations.

    The Atlantic Charter represented the embodiment of Roosevelt's quest for moral justification of American involvement. Presented to the world after the president and Prime Minister Churchill met off the coast of Newfoundland in the summer of 1941, the Charter set forth the common goals that would guide America over the next few years.

  2. Communism in China

    The communist party abandoned the Second Five Year plan a year early, in 1962, after these disastrous results were realized. Mao used the Chinese media, which the communist party controlled, to try to put much of the blame on others, though his career was permanently tarnished.

  1. How Successful was Soviet Foreign Policy under Khrushchev and Brezhnev

    The invasion of Afghanistan was a success for Brezhnev in terms of retaining the communist rule in Eastern Europe; however, in relations to associations with the West it only served to confirm the opinion of anti-détente campaigners in the West that the Soviet Union was still only interested in the world expansion of communism.

  2. Explain the success and failures of Mao in China

    As a consequence to the Red Guards behaviour China was on the verge on another civil war, in the meanwhile Mao had returned to power, but at the cost of 704 suicides and 534 deaths, therefore in this respect a failure of Mao.

  1. Does Deterrence work?

    Whilst Walzer does not deny that the threat of destroying millions of people - inevitably innocents and civilians in a nuclear war - violates common morality, he argues that under the conditions of the cold war which he describes as a "supreme emergency", the west is justified in issuing such a threat.

  2. Fidel Castro led the overthrow of the Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista in 1959 to ...

    In the early 1960s he formed the Federation of Cuban Women (FMC), appointing his brothers wife as leader, with the goal of promoting equality among sexes and changing women's traditional roles. Castro had different motives for endorsing these rights. In his valiant military effort to defend Cuba against the United

  1. Cuban missile crisis.

    There was no equivalent to EX-COMM in the Soviet Union. Instead, Khrushchev had to handle most of the decisions by himself. He spent many long hours in deliberation over what action to take about the United States' threat. At first, he thought that Kennedy would give in, so Khrushchev maintained a tough line.

  2. The Cuban Missile Crisis was the closest the world has every come to nuclear ...

    On October 5, Director of Central Intelligence John McCone predicted that there was a possibility that the Soviet military buildup "would end up with an established offensive capability in Cuba including MRBMs" (US Government website). Special Assistant for National Security Affairs McGeorge Bundy disagreed, stating that the Soviet Union wouldn't make such an audacious challenge.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work