• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Would you agree that the future of the Bourbon monarchy was doomed from the start? Discuss this with reference to the events of 1814-15?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Would you agree that the future of the Bourbon monarchy was doomed from the start? Discuss this with reference to the events of 1814-15? It is not fair to say that the future of the Bourbon monarchy was doomed from the start, because even though there were immediate drawbacks of association with an unpopular peace, this was more than balanced by the fact that France possessed economic and social potential. The good economy was demonstrated by the fact that much of Europe had suffered dislocation and devastation at the hands of warring armies, but only France had escaped lightly with only a few temporary difficulties. Also land was productive and populated by skillful peasantry and the industries could meet the demands of the country. Socially many of the tensions that had led to revolution in 1789 had been removed, due to the peasants been free and owning most of their land and so apposing any revolutionary activity, the bourgeoisie were no longer prevented from gaining social and political distinction and so would give support to any regime that would maintain the status quo and finally the church had more influence over the people therefore could teach people that existing social and political role was important. ...read more.

Middle

These men were fairly wealthy and drew their income from ownership of land. Support would have to be gained by these people if the restoration was to be a success because they would lead the masses in supporting it. Louis however spoilt the support he gained from the population initially, due to the various mistakes he made and this questioned whether the Bourbon Monarchy would be likely to exist in the future. These mistakes consisted of changing the flag of France, re-introducing elements of the pre-revolutionary court ceremonial, which raised suspicions about what was likely to follow, reconstituting the Household Guard which made up several thousand aristocratic officers, meaning that the �migr�s would gain power in the near future and also constructed a preamble to the Charter of 1814. In this he declared that he had been put there by the Divine Right of Kings and not because of the people. Due to these mistakes he found himself fleeing to the safety of a foreign land and the protection of armies in Britain and Prussia. The departure of Louis XVIII had led to Napoleons return. ...read more.

Conclusion

The execution of Marshal Ney in December 1815 turned him into a martyr for the liberals. Even though the White Terror had not made the Restoration impossible it certainly ensured that a cohort of politically ambitious men were kept permanently alienated and excluded from public life. This was the situation Louis had hoped to avoid. The allies were proved right in saying that it will have been difficult for Louis XVIII to re-establish himself. In conclusion it can be seen that to a certain extent it is not entirely fair to assume that the future of the Bourbon Monarchy was doomed from the start. This was because despite the events that occurred during 1814-15 the economic and social aspects of France outweighed these. It is certain that the election of Louis XVIII was not a very good idea because even though he did make some changes, these did not pacify the people and due to his bad personality he was not well respected as a leader. This will have led to people questioning the future of the Bourbon Monarchy, but it will not have been definitely said that it was doomed for failure. ?? ?? ?? ?? Rebecca Johnson Miss Garvie October 2004 History Essay ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1600-1699 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1600-1699 essays

  1. Why was there a revolution in France ?

    The storming of the Bastille was caused, it can be argued, by the popular fear of counter-revolution. The King, Louis XVI, had ordered troops to advance on Paris and this alarmed the population en masse because they thought that the Royal forces would come to put down the fledgling National Assembly.

  2. Role of Women in New France

    her husband.27 This hierarchical treatment was deemed necessary and was used with European women as well. European women were given many new freedoms as they continued to participate in the development of New France. However, they were always second. In 1725, the King of France reminded the women of his

  1. Why did the constitutional monarchy fail?

    A mob of Parisians sacked the kings placed and killed the guards. Louis escaped, but the legislative assembly gave into the Parisians and voted for the king's power and declared him a prisoner. France was known to be called a republic.

  2. Assess the reasons that contributed to the downfall of the French Monarchy in August ...

    The radical revolutionaries were so influential amongst the public in France that they would have been easily able to provide Louis and Marie Antionette as scapegoats for the loss.

  1. "The Japanese invasion of 1937 was a more significant turning point in Chinese History ...

    This meant that nothing really changed because in practical terms the same rule continued. This is why it is possible to argue that the Japanese Invasion was a more significant turning point, because it changed the rule of China completely and the CCP was able to take control and rule a more united China.

  2. Why was Richelieu's foreign policy so politically divisive from 1624-42?

    not a victory for either Richelieu or his critics in the early years of his ministry. The d�vots gained ground in terms of a closer relationship with Catholic Spain; however, Richelieu's true intentions were made clear by his expulsion of papal troops in 1624.

  1. Knowing About Louis XIV:The Historian's Task.

    It is by attempting to measure Louis' conviction to this ideological conflict that we may find some understanding about Louis the man. It was determined early in Louis' reign that the idea of impressing upon foreign courts the notion of Louis as a superior and indeed supreme monarch was a

  2. To what extent do you agree with the view expressed in the extract on ...

    Though the New Model Army were to be the "mainspring of the Revolution", perhaps it is questionable whether or not the King or Parliament had an impact. Charles and Parliament were both unwilling to compromise a peace settlement.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work