• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Criminal Justice Act 1993 (CJA) and the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FMA) does not sufficiently regulate insider dealing infringements in the UK."Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction Insider dealing is carried out where someone with confidential information about company shares, with the knowledge that the information would affect the price of the shares, deals in the shares with a view to making profit or avoiding a loss before the information is being made public.[1] Insider dealing practise is not a fresh topic. There are many suggestions, particularly in the UK, that the history of this practise is as old as the Stock Exchange itself.[2] Rider and Ashe argue that: '... [t]he main convincing justification for controlling insider dealing is that it has a perceived, adverse impact on confidence ... it will alienate investors and potential investors, with adverse consequences for society as a whole.' [3] By recognising 'society as a whole' as the victim, insider dealing is therefore not as what some has argued - a victimless crime. It is essential to guarantee the successful working of the stock exchange, and since insider dealing destroys the public confidence over its fairness, insider dealing is thus made illegal.[4] Until 1980, there had been no statutory legislation governing insider dealing in the UK. One of the reasons for this was due to the verdict in Percival v Wright[5] that a director's fiduciary duties are owed only to the company and not to individual member. UK insider dealing legislations are now contained in Part V of the Criminal Justice Act 1993 (CJA 1993) and in section 118 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA). As Professor Rider asserts, "in the real world a law which is not enforceable is of doubtful value"[6], this thesis therefore examine the major features of both the insider dealing legislation, with particular emphasis on the principal changes that it introduces and any potential flaws that it may contain in regulating insider dealing infringements in the UK. The effectiveness of CJA 1993 in regulating insider dealing infringements Part V of the legislation contains the essential elements for regulating the offence of insider dealing and the sanction is a criminal one. ...read more.

Middle

This would mean that criminal prosecutions would only be used in extremely serious case while other instances would be deal under the civil provisions, effectively avoiding the higher burden of proving beyond reasonable doubt the offence.[31] As mentioned earlier, criminal sanction under CJA 1993 may only attach to an individual. It was a major weakness of the legislation that it did not apply to corporations. The Market Abuse regime under FSMA filled up the loophole by making the offence of insider dealing applicable to most legal entities, including corporations and natural persons.[32] In addition, the FSMA market abuse and insider dealing provisions also have wider scope as compared to the previous legislation in CJA1993 as it apply not only to authorised persons, but also unauthorised persons who be involved in certain prescribed markets. As well as this, the insider dealing provisions under CJA 1993 are directed to corporate securities and derivatives on such securities only. FSMA again provides an apparent proof that its insider dealing provisions cover a wider range of actions as its provisions apply also to markets in commodity derivatives and financial futures which are of the same level of significance as that of corporate securities.[33] In general under the English law, an insider dealing infringements can only be punished if the dealing took place in the UK or when the insider engaged on the deal on a UK-regulated market or if the person dealing in the price-affected securities relies on a professional intermediary on a regulated UK market or is himself a professional intermediary. The coming into force of FSMA provides better regulation of insider dealing infringement as its provisions is extended to dealings occurred extraterritorial, making it an offence an insider dealing which takes place in a foreign jurisdiction but which might have an effect on UK markets. [34] A number of cases have come up after the promulgation of the FSMA and the most prominent among them is Hutchings and Smith.[35] Mr. ...read more.

Conclusion

1968) [26] ibid. [27] ibid. [28] s 118 FSMA 2000. [29] Albelooshi, op. cit., p. 165. [30] K Alexander, Insider Dealing and Market Abuse: The Financial Services and Market Act 2000, ESRC Centre for Business Research, Cambridge University, 2001, p.3. [31] FSA Handbook on Enforcement, ENF 15.7.2(5) [32] Alexander, op. cit., p.8. [33] Albelooshi, op. cit., p. 168. [34] Alexander, op. cit., p.20. [35] FSA Enforcement action, February 28, 2005 [36] S 118 FSMA 2000. [37] M Filby, 'The enforcement of insider dealing under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000', Company Lawyer, vol. 24, no. 41, 2003, p.334. [38] A Haynes, 'Market Abuse', Compliance Officer Bulletin, vol.75, 2010, p.3. [39] s 384, FSMA 2000. [40] s 381, FSMA 2000. [41] Haynes, loc. cit. [42] B Rider, 'The Control of Insider Dealing - smoke and mirrors!', Journal of Financial Crime, vol.7, no.3, 2000, p. 246. [43] Alexander, op. cit., p.14. [44] ENF 15.7.2(4) [45] Filby, op cit., p.338. [46] Filby, op cit., p.336. [47] s 6 and sch 1, FSMA 2000. [48] TJM, 'Should Insider Dealing and Market Abuse Remain?', [49] V Sharma, 'Prohibition on Insider Trading: A Toothless Law', Law School Research Paper No. 996, 2009, p.43. [50] Filby, op. cit., p.335. [51] Filby, op. cit., p.334. [52] Filby, op. cit, p. 337. [53] Filby, op. cit., p. 338. [54] C Band, 'Trustee and Insider Dealing: Part 2', Private Client Business, vol. 6, 2000, p.363. [55] P Johnstone and R Jones, Investigations and Enforcement, Butterworths & Company, UK, 2001, p36. [56] A Alcock, The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000: A Guide to the New Law, Jordans Ltd, UK, 2000, p. 170. [57] Haynes, op. cit, p.1. [58] G Wilson and S Wilson, 'Market misconduct, the Financial Services Authority and creating a system of "city grasses": blowing the whistle on whistle-blowing', Company Lawyer, vol. 31, no.3, 2010, pp.67-80. [59] M Filby, 'Part VIII Financial Services and Markets Act: filling insider dealing's regulatory gaps', Company Lawyer, vol.15, no.12, p.363. [60] s 402 (1) FSMA 2000 [61] C Conceicao, 'The FSA's approach to taking action against market abuse', Company Lawyer, vol.28, no.2, 2007, p.44. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Commercial Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Commercial Law essays

  1. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY & ITS IMPACT ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

    company.21 Due to directors being constrained to make decisions which further the corporations interest, that being profitability, they are precluded from making decisions which are primarily motivated by human moral values such as those relating to environmental concerns.22 It has even been stated that '[b]usiness corporations are legally recognised collective

  2. Critical Evaluation of The Companies Act 2006 and its comparison to The Companies Act ...

    A poll vote ensures that all members' investments within the company are represented proportionately. Part 13 of the Companies Act 2006 makes two important changes; it no longer requires for companies to hold Annual General Meetings and it introduces new and simpler procedures for decisions to be made by written resolution by private companies.

  1. Limited liability

    law should be seen as a means of assistance of the conduct of commerce so as to achieve economic benefit for the society, has drawn the attention for the need of regulation of limited liability companies38. Indeed, as it has been showed from the previous analysis, the limited liability institution,

  2. The World Trade Organization and Its Critics

    However the General Council can focus on administering and implementing several trade agreements and trade rules, negotiating concerns of food safety laws, product standards, telecommunications, finance and intellectual properties. Additionally they can explore alternatives such as organising forums for trade negotiations, adjudicating trade disputes, monitoring national trade policies, providing technical assistance to developing countries and cooperating with other international organisations.

  1. Company law - case study on setting up a business.

    The charge is placed against the company's assets at the time. With a floating charge the company can freely dispose of its assets and any new assets which are acquired are made available to the debenture holder. B.3 (a) The administration of a company is dealt with by the company secretary.

  2. Introduction to Commercial Law. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of resolving a civil ...

    Parties may come out of the courtroom feeling they may not have had a fair trial because of this. Arbitration Arbitration is a formal process for the resolution of disputes where the hearing is in private in front of a nominated third party (the arbitrator, arbiters or arbitral tribunal)

  1. In the current financial crisis, the directors of stricken UK financial institutions run as ...

    Directors also have a duty under s.174 CA 2006 to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence. The appointment of directors is made in accordance with the articles of association, for publicly listed companies it is regulation 19 of the model articles.

  2. Free essay

    Legal Environment - Popeye v Spinach Tankers Ltd. The appellant claimed damages under the ...

    should be applied when making decisions about whether the prosecution against Steven is appropriate or not. 'The Full Code Test' is applied, and split into two stages; the 'evidential' stage and the 'public interest' test. When proceeding through the evidential stage, the CPS must make sure there is a 'realistic

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work